H.R. 4417House118th Congress (2023-2025)In Committee

Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression Act

Introduced June 30, 2023

AI-Generated Summary

Updated January 20, 2026 at 9:35 AM UTC

The Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression Act aims to stop state and local governments from adding extra rules that affect how agricultural products are grown or handled when those products are sold across state lines. It gives producers, distributors, consumers and even governments the right to sue if a state or local rule interferes with interstate agricultural trade, and it allows courts to quickly block such rules while a case is decided.

Key Provisions

  • States or localities cannot impose additional pre‑harvest standards on agricultural products that are sold in interstate commerce if the production happens in another state, unless those standards are already required by federal law or the laws of the state where the product is grown.
  • If no standards exist at the federal or producing‑state level, the lack of standards is treated as the applicable standard for the purpose of the prohibition.
  • Anyone affected by a state or local regulation—such as a farmer, shipper, consumer, trade group, or government—may file a lawsuit to have the regulation declared invalid and to seek damages for economic loss.
  • Courts must issue a preliminary injunction to stop enforcement of the challenged regulation unless the state can show it is likely to win at trial and that an injunction would cause it irreparable harm.
  • Lawsuits must be filed within ten years of when the cause of action arose, and may be brought in the appropriate federal district court or another court with jurisdiction.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

June 30, 2023

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

June 30, 2023

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

June 30, 2023

Floor Debate

2 members

What members said about H.R. 4417 on the floor

2 Republicans
Doug LaMalfa
Rep. Doug LaMalfaR-CA-1 · Jul 20, 2023

Mr. Speaker, it used to be California was the land of really good ideas and innovation, but the last 30 or so years it has been a place where a lot of really bad ideas come from and impact the rest…

Nancy Mace
Rep. Nancy MaceR-SC-1 · Sep 12, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I rise to add my voice to those of my colleagues who are coming to the Floor this week to speak about, and to legislate in response to, the growing threat from the Chinese Communist…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued June 30, 2023

I

118th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 4417

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 30, 2023

Mrs. Hinson (for herself, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, Mr. Feenstra, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Alford, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. Flood, Mr. Gosar, and Mrs. Fischbach) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prevent States and local jurisdictions from interfering with the production and distribution of agricultural products in interstate commerce, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression Act.

2.

Prohibition against interference by State and local governments with production of items in other States

(a)

Definition of agricultural products

In this section, the term agricultural products has the meaning given the term in section 207 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1626).

(b)

Prohibition

The government of a State or a unit of local government within a State shall not impose a standard or condition on the preharvest production of any agricultural products sold or offered for sale in interstate commerce if—

(1)

the production occurs in another State; and

(2)

the standard or condition is in addition to the standards and conditions applicable to the production pursuant to—

(A)

Federal law; and

(B)

the laws of the State and unit of local government in which the production occurs.

(c)

Rule of construction

If no standards or conditions are applicable to the production of an agricultural product pursuant to Federal law, or the laws of a State or unit of local government in which the production occurs, that lack of standards and conditions shall be deemed to be the standards and conditions applicable to the production of the agricultural product for purposes of subsection (b)(2).

3.

Federal cause of action to challenge State regulation of interstate commerce

(a)

Definition of agricultural products

In this section, the term agricultural products has the meaning given the term in section 207 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1626).

(b)

Private right of action

A person, including a producer, a transporter, a distributer, a consumer, a laborer, a trade association, the Federal Government, a State government, or a unit of local government, that is affected by a regulation of a State or unit of local government that regulates any aspect of 1 or more agricultural products that are sold in interstate commerce, including any aspect of the method of production, or any means or instrumentality through which 1 or more agricultural products are sold in interstate commerce may bring an action in the appropriate court to invalidate that regulation and seek damages for economic loss resulting from that regulation.

(c)

Preliminary injunction

On a motion of the plaintiff in an action brought under subsection (b), the court shall issue a preliminary injunction to preclude the applicable State or unit of local government from enforcing the regulation at issue until such time as the court enters a final judgment in the case, unless the State or unit of local government proves by clear and convincing evidence that—

(1)

the State or unit of local government is likely to prevail on the merits at trial; and

(2)

the injunction would cause irreparable harm to the State or unit of local government.

(d)

Statute of limitations

No action shall be maintained under this section unless the action is commenced not later than 10 years after the cause of action arose.

(e)

Jurisdiction

A person described in subsection (b) may bring an action under that subsection in—

(1)

the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the person—

(A)

is affected by a regulation described in that subsection; or

(B)

resides, operates, or does business; or

(2)

any other appropriate court otherwise having jurisdiction.