H.R. 8093House118th Congress (2023-2025)In Committee

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act

Introduced April 19, 2024

AI-Generated Summary

Updated January 20, 2026 at 4:06 PM UTC

The Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act amends the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 to let the State Justice Institute award grants to nonprofit groups that can set up State judicial threat intelligence and resource centers. These centers would improve security for state and local judges and court staff through training, threat monitoring, coordination with law‑enforcement, and a shared database. The law also requires annual reporting on threats to judges and court personnel.

Key Provisions

  • Defines “eligible organization” as a national nonprofit with expertise in judicial security, courthouse design, and court operations.
  • Authorizes the State Justice Institute to provide financial and technical awards to eligible organizations to establish and run State judicial threat and intelligence resource centers.
  • Requires centers to provide safety education, physical security assessments, monitor threats, coordinate with federal, state, and local law‑enforcement, develop standardized incident reporting, create a national threat database, and conduct research on best practices.
  • Mandates the State Justice Institute to submit an annual report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on the number, types, and seriousness of threats to state and local judges and court staff.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

April 19, 2024

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

April 19, 2024

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

April 19, 2024

Floor Debate

1 member

What members said about H.R. 8093 on the floor

1 Republican
Pete Sessions
Rep. Pete SessionsR-TX-17 · Sep 20, 2024

Mr. Speaker, today, I rise to honor Judge Julie Kocurek, who is the 390th State District judge in Austin, Texas. In 2015, the judge survived an assassination attempt by a criminal defendant seeking…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued April 19, 2024

I

118th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 8093

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 19, 2024

Ms. Jackson Lee (for herself and Mr. McCaul) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 to authorize the State Justice Institute to provide awards to certain organizations to establish a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act.

2.

Definitions

Section 202 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10701) is amended—

(1)

in paragraph (7), by striking and at the end;

(2)

in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and

(3)

by adding at the end the following:

(9)

eligible organization means a national nonprofit organization that—

(A)

provides technical assistance and training on, and has expertise and national-level experience in, judicial security and safety at the State and local levels;

(B)

has experience in courthouse design and courthouse security design standards;

(C)

has an understanding of State judicial operations and public access to judicial services; and

(D)

has experience working with a wide array of different judges and court systems, including an understanding of the challenges facing trial courts, appellate courts, rural courts, and limited-jurisdiction courts at the State and local levels.

.

3.

Establishment of State judicial threat intelligence and resource center

Section 206(c) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10705(c)) is amended—

(1)

in paragraph (14), by striking and at the end;

(2)

by redesignating paragraph (15) as paragraph (16); and

(3)

by inserting after paragraph (14) the following:

(15)

to provide financial and technical support to eligible organizations to establish, implement, and operate a State judicial threat and intelligence resource center to—

(A)

provide technical assistance and training around judicial security, including—

(i)

providing judicial officer safety education and training for judicial officers, courts, and local law enforcement;

(ii)

creating resources and guides around judicial security; and

(iii)

providing physical security assessments for courts, homes, and other facilities where judicial officers and staff conduct court-related business;

(B)

proactively monitor threats to the safety of State and local judges and court staff;

(C)

coordinate with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies to mitigate threats to the safety of State and local judges and court staff;

(D)

develop standardized incident reporting and threat evaluation practices for State and local courts in coordination with State and local law enforcement and fusion centers;

(E)

develop a national database for reporting, tracking, and sharing information about threats and incidents towards judicial officers and court staff at local and State levels with entities working in the interest of judicial security, including State and local law enforcement and fusion centers; and

(F)

coordinate research to identify, examine, and advance best practices around judicial security.

.

4.

Reports

Not later than 1 year after the date on which a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center is established under paragraph (15) of section 206(c) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984, as added by section 3 of this Act, the State Justice Institute shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives an annual report on the number of threats to State and local judiciary members and court staff, with breakdown of types of threats and level of seriousness.