H.R. 10957House119th Congress (2025-2027)In Committee

PURGE Act

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to study and report on anti-microplastic strategies, and to establish a pilot program to demonstrate and evaluate anti-microplastic strategies.

Also known as Plastics Understanding and Removal through Government Evaluation Act

Sponsored by Nancy MaceRep. Nancy Mace (R-SC)
Introduced November 5, 2026

AI-Generated Summary

Updated November 7, 2026 at 4:21 AM UTC

The Plastics Understanding and Removal through Government Evaluation (PURGE) Act directs the EPA to study anti‑microplastic strategies, report the findings within 180 days, and create a five‑year pilot program to test those strategies. The effort focuses on water‑related environments and involves the EPA, NOAA, USGS, state environmental agencies, and water‑treatment operators.

Key Provisions

  • EPA must conduct a study identifying and analyzing all anti‑microplastic strategies, covering effectiveness, ecotoxicity, cost, recyclability, and operational requirements, and report the results to Congress within 180 days.
  • Within one year, EPA must launch a pilot program that runs for five years, demonstrating and evaluating strategies in at least three regions that include riverine, coastal, and municipal wastewater settings.
  • The pilot must use quantitative success metrics such as verified biodegradation rates, absence of secondary micro‑ or nanoplastics, ecotoxicity thresholds, and preservation of recyclability.
  • Priority is given to strategies that can be deployed in existing water‑treatment or storm‑water infrastructure without major new construction.
  • EPA must coordinate the pilot with NOAA, USGS, and state environmental or natural‑resources agencies, and submit a final report to Congress within one year after the pilot ends.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

November 5, 2026

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

November 5, 2026

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

November 5, 2026

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued November 5, 2026

I

119th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 10957

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

November 5, 2026

Ms. Mace introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to study and report on anti-microplastic strategies, and to establish a pilot program to demonstrate and evaluate anti-microplastic strategies.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Plastics Understanding and Removal through Government Evaluation Act or the PURGE Act.

2.

Study and report on anti-microplastic strategies

(a)

Study

(1)

In general

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall conduct a study on anti-microplastic strategies.

(2)

Elements

The study conducted under paragraph (1) shall—

(A)

identify the different types of anti-microplastic strategies that are available; and

(B)

analyze—

(i)

the effectiveness of each type of anti-microplastic strategy identified under subparagraph (A) to mitigate and remove microplastics and nanoplastics from the environment, based on verified biodegradation using recognized testing standards;

(ii)

the performance of each such type of strategy under different conditions, including industrial composting, landfill, soil, and marine conditions;

(iii)

the ecotoxicity of byproducts resulting from the degradation of plastic using each such type of strategy, based on recognized testing standards;

(iv)

the effect of each such type of strategy on the recyclability of treated materials within existing municipal recycling infrastructure;

(v)

the cost-effectiveness of each such type of strategy; and

(vi)

the operational capabilities and requirements of each such type of strategy, including infrastructure requirements, staffing and training needs, and regulatory or permitting barriers to deployment at wastewater treatment facilities.

(b)

Report

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the results of the study conducted under subsection (a)(1).

3.

Pilot program to demonstrate and evaluate anti-microplastic strategies

(a)

Establishment

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall establish and carry out a pilot program under which the Administrator demonstrates and evaluates anti-microplastic strategies.

(b)

Requirements

(1)

In general

In carrying out the pilot program, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall—

(A)

demonstrate and evaluate anti-microplastic strategies in at least 3 different geographic regions that, to the extent practicable—

(i)

include a range of environmental settings, including riverine, coastal, and municipal wastewater systems; and

(ii)

are in reasonable proximity, as determined by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to a facility managed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or the United States Geological Survey;

(B)

evaluate the effectiveness, cost, and scalability of anti-microplastic strategies;

(C)

prioritize demonstrating and evaluating anti-microplastic strategies that are capable of being deployed at existing water treatment or stormwater infrastructure without requiring substantial new construction; and

(D)

identify situations in which additional research is warranted before broader deployment of a type of anti-microplastic strategy, including situations in which—

(i)

the type of strategy has not been demonstrated at a sufficient scale;

(ii)

the environmental or economic effects of the type of strategy are not adequately understood;

(iii)

data on the type or concentration of microplastics and nanoplastics present in the region in which the type of strategy was deployed are not reasonably available; and

(iv)

the region in which the type of strategy was deployed has characteristics that may limit the applicability of the type of strategy to other locations.

(2)

Establishment of criteria

Before demonstrating or evaluating any anti-microplastic strategy under the pilot program, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall establish quantitative success metrics for the demonstration and evaluation of anti-microplastic strategies under the pilot program, including a minimum percent of verified biodegradation within a defined monitoring period, the absence of secondary microplastic and nanoplastics formation as confirmed through molecular-level testing, ecotoxicity results within thresholds established under recognized testing standards, and preservation of recyclability where applicable.

(c)

Coordination

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall coordinate the demonstration and evaluation of anti-microplastic strategies under the pilot program with—

(1)

the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Geological Survey; and

(2)

State environmental protection or natural resources authorities.

(d)

Duration

The pilot program shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date on which the pilot program was established.

(e)

Report

Not later than 1 year after the date on which the pilot program terminates, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the results of the pilot program.

4.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Anti-microplastic strategy

The term anti-microplastic strategy means—

(A)

downstream removal; or

(B)

source-side materials engineering.

(2)

Downstream removal

The term downstream removal means removing microplastic or nanoplastic from the environment using filtration or capture technology.

(3)

Microplastic

The term microplastic means a plastic particle that is—

(A)

equal to or smaller than 5 millimeters; and

(B)

larger than 1 nanometer.

(4)

Nanoplastic

The term nanoplastic means a plastic particle that is smaller than 1 micrometer.

(5)

Pilot program

The term pilot program means the pilot program established under section 3(a).

(6)

Recognized testing standard

The term recognized testing standard means a test method or protocol developed by an accredited standards development organization, including ASTM International and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, for evaluating the potential biodegradation, ecotoxicity, or recyclability of plastic materials.

(7)

Source-side materials engineering

The term source-side materials engineering means adding chemicals to a plastic resin so the finished product is consumed by microbes or mycelium at the end of life instead of fragmenting into persistent microplastics or nanoplastics.

(8)

Verified biodegradation

The term verified biodegradation means degradation of a material confirmed through molecular-level analytical testing, rather than visual observation or mass-loss measurement alone.