Mr. Speaker, I submit the following regarding the culture of poverty in Cuba under the Castro regime. [From the Jersey Journal, Dec. 31, 2011] Cuba's Culture of Poverty Persists (By Roland A. Alum) The Fidel-&-Raul Castro regime marks 53…
Mr. Speaker, I submit the following regarding the culture of poverty in Cuba under the Castro regime.
[From the Jersey Journal, Dec. 31, 2011]
Cuba's Culture of Poverty Persists
(By Roland A. Alum)
The Fidel-&-Raul Castro regime marks 53 years this Jan. 1.
The brothers unquestionably enjoyed extraordinary popularity
in 1959, but the enthusiasm soon vanished as they turned Cuba
into a financially and spiritually bankrupt Marxist anti-
utopia.
As a result, nearly two million Cubans of all social
backgrounds have fled, many of them settling in Hudson
County.
By the 1950s, Cuba was a regional leader in numerous social
indicators, notwithstanding instability and corruption during
the republican era (1902-1958). But since 1959 the island-
nation has become a backward, closed society beleaguered by
unproductivity and rationing.
Sociologist Tomas Masaryk noted that ``dictators `look
good' until the last minutes''; in Cuba's case, it seems
particularly fine to certain U.S. intellectuals. Comfortably
from abroad, apologists contend that most of the
socioeconomic problems that traditionally afflicted the prior
five and a half decades were eliminated after 1959. Yet,
fact-finding by international social-scientists challenges
this fantasy.
An early, little-known account uncovering some effects of
the Castros' regimentation came from research in Cuba in
1969-'70 by U.S. cultural-anthropologists Oscar Lewis and
Douglas Butterworth. They intended to test Lewis' theory that
a culture of poverty would not exist in a Marxist-oriented
society. They had naively presupposed that the socially
alienating conditions that engender such phenomena could
develop among the poor solely under capitalism.
The Lewis-Butterworth early on-the-ground scrutiny
validates many accounts by respected experts and the much
vilified exiles. There exists a culture of poverty in Cuba,
although it is not necessarily a survivor of the old times,
but seemingly a by-product of the Castros' totalitarian
socialism. There were always poor Cubans, and some version of
the culture of poverty might have existed before; but in my
communications with Butterworth, he reconfirmed another
discovery. The researchers could not
document a case for a pervasive pre-1959 culture of poverty.
The authorities must have suspected the prospective
conclusions because the scholars were abruptly expelled and
their Cuban statistician imprisoned.
Upon the 53rd anniversary, the old Lewis-Butterworth
analysis invites renewed reflection. Apologists customarily
replicate propagandistic cliches by blaming failures on
external factors, such as the ending, two decades ago, of the
multibillion-dollar subsidies from the defunct Soviet Bloc.
The anthropologists' undertaking, however, revealed that
life for average Cubans in the Castros' first decade was
already beset with corruption and time-wasting food lines.
Likewise, Butterworth described how ordinary people were
engaging in what sociobehavioral scientists now call
``everyday forms of resistance.'' Cubans were already
undermining the police-state through black-marketeering,
pilfering and vandalism, as we hear that they continue to do
decades later.
After more than half a century of oppression and poor
quality of life, one hopes for a transition to an open
society with equal opportunities for every Cuban.