Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks on the legislation and to insert extraneous material on H.R. 21. Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr.…
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks on the legislation and to insert extraneous material on H.R. 21.
Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chair, I rise in support of H.R. 21, the Strategic Production Response Act.
Two weeks ago, this body sent a strong message that we must ensure our Nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve will not advance the energy interests of China over the energy security interests of Americans.
This bill today will help ensure this vital American energy asset and American security interests will not be drained away for nonemergency, political purposes. This bill is about restoring America's energy security. It provides a path towards making energy more affordable for Americans who are looking to us to help ease the pain at the pump.
H.R. 21 does this by preserving the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for its vital and central purpose: to provide the oil supplies Americans need during true emergencies--emergencies like supply disruptions that threaten the Nation's economy, or the loss of oil production due to hurricanes and other disasters.
Put simply, under this bill, if an administration chooses to use the reserve for nonemergency political purposes, it will first have to develop a plan that an equal amount would be reinstated from American energy resources.
The SPR should be used as a tool of last resort. This is sensible energy policy. It is also urgent policy. At present, the SPR's ability to protect Americans has been put at risk. More than 250 million barrels of oil, approximately 40 percent of the reserve, has been drawn down in less than 2 years. This is more than all of the former Presidents in history combined. It is all to cover up historically high gas prices in an election year. This is irresponsible.
The Biden administration has undermined our Nation's ability to respond to true energy emergencies by mismanaging our Nation's strategic energy stockpile. At the same time, the administration has taken every action to suppress America's mighty energy production abilities. Unbelievably, the Biden administration has turned to Venezuela and Saudi Arabia to pump more oil instead of working to lift their regulatory restraints on American energy producers.
America's oil production and refining capacity remains 1 million barrels below peak levels during the prior administration. We have the world's most abundant resources and the capacity to produce millions more barrels per day.
America should never be at the mercy of OPEC or Russia. Energy security is economic security and it is national security. It is all connected. It is foundational to everything. We should be unleashing American energy on all fronts.
Don't forget, Mr. Chair, the United States has some of the highest environmental and labor standards in the world. We have been the leader in bringing down carbon emissions. We did this by embracing innovation and our abundant natural resources, not by shutting down entire industries.
Right now, America is suffering through the worst energy crisis in decades, and gas prices are still surging upwards. Now, President Biden's and the Democrats' radical rush-to-green agenda has made life unaffordable for people across the country. It has driven up inflation, it has strained household budgets, and it has weakened our electric grid.
Gas prices have risen to the highest levels in history. Some have been forced to pay more than $6 a gallon. Gas prices are still 40 percent higher today, and diesel prices are up almost $2 a gallon more than when President Biden took office.
It is time to flip the switch. It is time to end the politically motivated abuse of the SPR and focus on American energy and American security. Let's send a strong signal this Congress that we stand for energy security, preserving the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, restoring America's energy dominance, and providing for the prosperity of all Americans.
Mr. Chair, I urge support of H.R. 21, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Johnson), who is a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Walberg), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Arizona (Mrs. Lesko).
Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Pence), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Curtis), the vice chair of the Energy, Climate, and Grid Security Subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to yield 1\1/ 2\ minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Joyce), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
When President Biden was inaugurated in January of 2021, gas prices were $2.33 a gallon. I doubt you can find that anywhere in America today. $2.33 a gallon. They have only gone up since then.
The war on Ukraine did not cause the energy crisis, it just exposed what was going on.
Refining and production is down a million barrels from when President Biden was elected. There has been the shutting down of American energy. It is time to unleash American energy.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Carter), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Dunn), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Weber), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Allen), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Balderson), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Pfluger), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chair, if you bought gas recently, you would be aware gas prices are up 40 cents just in the last couple of weeks. Our reserve is drained. We need to pass this bill.
Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Iowa (Mrs. Miller-Meeks), a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, the administration may have temporarily artificially reduced gas prices. Up until election day, they were selling a million barrels per day out of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. They have now drained the reserve, leaving us vulnerable, and gas prices are on their way up again since Christmas, 40 cents just since Christmas.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Scalise), our majority leader.
Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Obernolte), a leader on the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Duncan), the chairman of the Energy, Climate, and Grid Security Subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Mr. Chairman, may I inquire as to how much time I have remaining?
Mr. Chair, I am pleased to yield 45 seconds to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Malliotakis).
Mr. Chair, I yield 30 seconds to the gentlewoman from Oklahoma (Mrs. Bice).
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Arrington).
Mr. Chair, may I inquire as to how much time is remaining?
Mr. Chair, this is reasonable, commonsense legislation that will strengthen America's energy security, protect our national security, and preserve our strategic energy stockpile for true emergencies. It only addresses the nonemergency sales.
The Biden administration has sold off more than 250 million barrels, a million barrels per day up until the election, and more than 40 percent of our reserve. Put an end to this.
Mr. Chair, I urge support of H.R. 21, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the amendment that would maintain current law.
President Trump imposed a decade-long ban in offshore drilling off the coast of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. Nothing in the underlying bill, H.R. 21, would change that.
To be clear, nothing in H.R. 21 affects any existing statutory or regulatory restrictions that may prohibit offshore oil and gas development. The purpose and scope of the bill is limited. It is to protect the SPR from politically motivated drawdowns and to ensure the American people are protected from true emergencies in energy supply disruptions. It would require the Department of Energy to develop a plan.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to support the amendment and the underlying bill, H.R. 21.
Mr. Chair, I reserve a point of order against the amendment.
Mr. Chair, I do insist on the point of order. The amendment amends the Energy Policy Act of 1992. That statute is not amended by this bill.
Mr. Chair, I withdraw.
Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.
Mr. Chair, this amendment excludes a tract of land in the North Atlantic from being included in the leasing plan. So virtually all offshore oil and gas leasing occurs in the Gulf of Mexico.
Offshore oil and gas exploration accounts for roughly 15 percent of all domestic oil production and 2 percent of domestic natural gas production. By further limiting this potentially vast resource, we are not going to be able to keep up with demand as it increases.
H.R. 21 does not require the Department of Energy to drill in any specific area. We shouldn't take items off the table before a review has been done.
Moreover, our plan can be changed as new information comes along, while the mandate in this amendment is inflexible to fact, science, and the needs that may arise from national emergencies.
Mr. Chair, I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I appreciate the gentlewoman from South Carolina informing us of what the current law states.
I just want to confirm that the bill has no effect on these current laws and regulations. It is a good amendment and I support it.
Mr. Chair, I reserve a point of order.
Mr. Chair, I withdraw my reservation of a point of order.
Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.
Mr. Chair, this amendment really duplicates an amendment that we just passed, if you think about the amendment that was offered by Congressman Matt Gaetz. President Trump imposed a decade-long ban on oil drilling off the coast of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina; and nothing in this legislation--nothing in H.R. 21--will change that.
If my colleagues across the aisle are concerned about drilling off the coast of Florida, I would just note that. To be clear, nothing in H.R. 21 affects any existing statutory or regulatory restrictions that may prohibit offshore oil and gas development.
The purpose of the underlying bill is limited. It is to protect the SPR from politically motivated drawdowns and to ensure the American people are protected in times of true emergencies when the energy supply is disrupted.
The Strategic Petroleum Reserve has enjoyed bipartisan support for years. This administration decided to draw it down unilaterally leading up to the election. It has been drawn down 40 percent.
The underlying bill would ensure that we can take the steps necessary through domestic energy production to refill SPR. The amendment that was introduced by my colleague on the Energy and Commerce Committee is really unnecessary. It goes beyond the scope of H.R. 21.
Mr. Chair, I urge opposition, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I move to strike the last word.
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
But in response to the ranking member, I just want to underscore that H.R. 21 is designed to stop the abuse of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for nonemergency political reasons such as President Biden's decision to drain the SPR in the days leading up to the election.
So the other side likes to say: Well, it was the war in Ukraine that caused the prices to go up.
The war in Ukraine just exposed the energy crisis that started on day one of the Biden administration.
Mr. Chair, on day one of the Biden administration, gas prices were $2.33 a gallon, and they have just continued to go up, jeopardizing reliability and affordability, as well as our national security.
My concern with the gentlewoman's amendment is that the SPR is one of America's most important energy security tools, and we cannot tie the hands of the President regardless of which party is in office when we have a real emergency like a hurricane, a terrorist attack, or something that disrupts our oil supply.
The underlying bill, H.R. 21, is focused on protecting SPR from President Biden's abuse of it.
H.R. 21 should be a bipartisan bill. It should be a bipartisan bill. Just a couple of weeks ago, we passed H.R. 22, Protecting America's Strategic Petroleum Reserve From China Act which gained the support of my Democrat colleagues--over 100 Democratic colleagues voting with us to ban exports of SPR to China.
Let's keep the momentum going. Let's send the Senate and the President a very strong, bipartisan bill.
Representative Greene is right that President Biden has abused our strategic stockpile, and he has failed to put forward a plan to increase domestic energy supply.
Let's pass the underlying bill and get back to work.
Mr. Chair, I urge ``no'' on the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, this bill is about protecting our strategic reserves and ensuring American energy production, which we do cleaner than any other nation in the world.
If we are serious about addressing global climate risk and preserving and expanding the prosperity of the American people, we should focus on American security and American energy.
This amendment is not necessary. I urge opposition. Vote ``no.''
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. Chair, this amendment is a savings clause. It states that nothing in H.R. 21 impacts existing legal restrictions on oil and gas leasing in the North Atlantic Planning Area. This will ensure that this bill is not interpreted to make changes there.
Mr. Chair, I urge a ``yes'' vote on the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, this amendment would require the Secretary of Energy to consult with the EPA Administrator and the Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs on the required leasing plan. I rise in opposition to the amendment because it expands the scope of EPA. EPA does not oversee Federal lands; the Department of the Interior does.
Further, this amendment is duplicative. H.R. 21 already requires the Secretary of Energy to consult with the Secretary of the Interior. The Bureau of Indian Affairs is in the Department of the Interior and falls under the Secretary's purview.
Mr. Chairman, I urge a ``no'' vote, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I appreciate the gentleman bringing this amendment forward. It would simply require the plan to be submitted to Congress. It is a good amendment, and I urge our colleagues to support it.
Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment.
This amendment would further allow the President to abuse the SPR by draining it without declaring an emergency under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The statute is clear, and emergency triggers to use SPRs are well defined. The law requires the President to declare that a severe energy supply interruption exists. The statute defines a supply interruption as follows:
One, ``an emergency situation exists and there is a significant reduction in supply, which is of significant scope and duration'';
Two, ``a severe increase in the price of petroleum products has resulted from such emergency situation'';
Three, ``such price increase is likely to cause a major adverse impact on the national economy.''
SPR is a critical national security asset and should only have been utilized in accordance with the law. This amendment would create a new loophole to allow the President to continue raiding SPR for political purposes.
I urge a ``no'' on the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the gentlewoman yielding.
I appreciate the gentlewoman offering this amendment that I believe will actually bring greater transparency and oversight to the plan for managing the balance of fuel stored in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for domestic emergencies, and I urge support.