Madam Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1736 and ask for its immediate consideration. Madam Speaker, for purposes of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to my friend from North Carolina,…
Madam Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1736 and ask for its immediate consideration.
Madam Speaker, for purposes of debate only, I yield the
customary 30 minutes to my friend from North Carolina, (Dr. Foxx).
General Leave
I also ask unanimous consent that all Members be given 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on House Resolution 1736.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, House Resolution 1736 provides for the consideration of the bill H.R. 4783, the Claims Resolution Act of 2010. It makes in order a motion to concur in the Senate amendment thereon by the chairman of the Committee on Natural Resources. It provides 1 hour of debate, with 50 minutes of debate controlled by the Natural Resources Committee and 10 minutes controlled by the Ways and Means Committee.
The bill contains a number of important provisions, many of which have already passed the House. It approves settlements in the class action lawsuits brought against the United States Department of Agriculture by African American farmers and against the Interior Department by Native Americans.
The bill will fully fund America's obligations in these cases and settles both the Cobell and Pigford class action lawsuits. Both of these have been in the courts and settlement talks for years and years.
In Cobell, the Interior Department was ruled at fault for mismanaging billions of dollars in grazing land, gas, and other royalties owed to thousands of American Indians. This settlement will pay off roughly 500,000 plaintiffs in the case. In Pigford, the Agriculture Department discriminated against thousands of African American farmers who applied for loans and other assistance during the 1980s and 1990s.
The plaintiffs in these cases have waited decades for resolution of this matter. Justice must not be delayed any further. Passing this measure will bring closure for hundreds of thousands of Americans who have been mistreated or had their rights violated by the government.
Passage will also approve four water rights settlements with American Indian tribes, providing the tribes with funding to rehabilitate and build new reservoirs, irrigation and water distribution systems. The House has already approved three out of four of these settlements.
Another critical provision in this bill is the extension of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, also known as TANF. This comes at a time when so many Americans are struggling financially and are due to lose the support of this program if the House does not act. While the Senate amendments we are considering today incur more costs in the short term, over 10 years this bill will actually save money and reduce the deficit.
On November 19, the Senate took up the bill, adopted an amendment in the nature of a substitute, and passed the bill, all by unanimous consent. The House must pass these measures without any further delay. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of the rule and the underlying bill.
I reserve the balance of my time.
In response to my friend from North Carolina, I would say that the Republicans in the United States Senate are the ones who have been holding up legislation just as this until they get what they want. They put all these things together, and send it back to the House.
With that, I yield 3 minutes to my friend from Missouri (Mr. Clay).
I would just say to my friend from Iowa that the settlement now applies to all African American farmers who were discriminated against, not just those that filed their claim by 1997, and as a consequence, it's a much broader class that is being settled with. We just can't have this kind of discrimination going on in this country, and America needs to pay its debts and not allow this kind of discrimination to go forward.
Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to my friend from Ohio, Congresswoman Fudge.
Madam Speaker, I would remind the body that we're here to discuss Cobell v. Salazar, Pigford v. Glickman, plus the settlement of a number of water right cases.
But even having said that, I would like to respond to my friend from North Carolina that not even the Republican Congress that set forth these tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires thought they would go on forever. They set them so that they would expire at the end of this year so that this Nation would have the revenue that it needs to pay its bills. But the Republicans who have now taken this House want to continue those tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires so that this country can't pay its bills as it's supposed to.
So the tax cuts, prosecuting two wars without paying for them, allowing the bottom to fall out of Wall Street without any regulation sent this country into a huge deficit which has to stop, and it has to stop now.
Now, we've seen, since we've passed the Recovery Act, growth in the economy, not that loss of 6 percent as we saw in the final quarter of the Bush administration. But we've seen five consecutive quarters of growth. We've seen increased employment from the private sector. We have a long way to go, and tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires are not the way to do it.
With that, I yield 3\1/2\ minutes to my friend from Texas, Congresswoman Jackson Lee.
Madam Speaker, I guess I have a completely opposite view of my friend from North Carolina as to the importance of this bill. The payment for wrongs against thousands and thousands and thousands of people that were delayed under Republican Congresses, Republican Presidents, it is about time that we settle these cases and pay the bills to people who were either discriminated against or had their trust moneys bungled by the Interior Department.
We actually, through the course of all this, had one Interior Secretary under a Republican President who got herself in trouble. Ultimately, it was all resolved. Now it's time to settle these particular cases. Decades of litigation, decades of settlement talks. It is a red-letter day that the discrimination and the mismanagement that harmed so many people are resolved.
That's the purpose. That's why this has been a bipartisan bill and I hope will be a bipartisan vote later today when we take up the bill.
There are 500,000 Native Americans whose communities were deprived of revenue rightfully and legally owed to them for commercial development of their land. There are thousands of other Native Americans whose communities will benefit by completing long overdue water projects.
There are also 70,000 farmers in the Pigford case who were deprived of their ability to farm because of their race, out and out discrimination. Hundreds of thousands of Americans will receive some help this holiday season because we will extend temporary assistance for needy families.
My Republican friends like to talk about tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, tax cuts that were supposed to expire, have been planned to expire by a Republican Congress from the beginning of the decade. This isn't something new. This isn't some big surprise. But the Republicans in the House and the Republicans in the Senate would like to hole up and do nothing until their friends, the millionaires and billionaires, continue these tax cuts, and at the same time stop payment and satisfaction of claims that have been long overdue to these hundreds of thousands of Native Americans and thousands and thousands of black farmers, as well as millions of people who need assistance under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
This country pays its bills, doesn't just give tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans among us. That's what this Democratic Congress is about. That's what the Democratic Senate and this President is about. It is about honoring our commitments and stopping discrimination.
I am pleased we are going to pass this bill today, and I hope that all Members support it and not delay any further these rightful claims that have existed for so long.
With that I urge a ``yes'' vote on the previous question and on the rule.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the previous question on the resolution.
The previous question was ordered.