I thank the Chair. Mr. President, I come to the Chamber today to discuss amendments to promote our success in Iraq as quickly as possible, consistent with accomplishing our mission there, to hold those in charge for implementing our…
I thank the Chair.
Mr. President, I come to the Chamber today to discuss amendments to promote our success in Iraq as quickly as possible, consistent with accomplishing our mission there, to hold those in charge for implementing our strategy in Iraq accountable for its success, and to do right by those bearing the burden of that conflict on our behalf, our brave military personnel and their loving families.
These amendments are designed to increase the number of armored vehicles for our troops in the field and to promote and to protect their families financially at home but, even more important, to provide a clear picture of what we are doing in Iraq and a way to measure our progress there so that we can bring our troops home with their mission accomplished.
Last week, Generals Casey and Abizaid came to Congress to inform us that the administration had finally heeded bipartisan calls from this body to develop a plan for success, a plan that goes way beyond merely asking the American people to stay the course.
During their testimony before the Armed Services Committee and in private briefings for Senators, the generals talked about the plan and how it was developed jointly with Iraqi leadership. Essentially, if the plan is to be successful, it will lead to a reduction of American forces starting next year.
In a discussion with Senator McCain, General Casey had the following to say:
Senator McCain: Are you planning on troop withdrawals for
next year?
General Casey: I just said that, Senator. Yes. This is a
bipartisan goal that we all support. Creating a stable Iraq
and bringing American men and women home safely as soon as
possible consistent with success is something that we all
embrace.
The generals also said that they had developed specific guidelines to allow them to measure the success of this plan. I am pleased that a plan has been developed and measurements created to gauge its success, although belatedly so. But I also know that having a plan is not nearly enough. It is the effective implementation of a strategy that will determine our ultimate success and establishing benchmarks that allow us to determine the progress that is being made. Regrettably, we have had far more of the development of a strategy and far less of the accountability for implementing the strategy so far in the Iraqi conflict. The time for changing that has come.
Successful execution of any plan includes two things that have been lacking so far--accountability and candor. My amendment brings both of these elements into the administration's war effort.
The amendment requires the Pentagon and the CIA to report to Congress and to the American people once a month on the progress they are making with regard to their own strategy and how it is faring on the measurements they have outlined to determine our success. It is their strategy, their benchmarks. If they are not being met, the administration should explain to the American people why. If no adequate explanation exists, those responsible must be held accountable. That is the way you run any business or any State, and that is the least we can expect when waging war.
These benchmarks are crucial to gauging our progress and are vital to achieving our success. They were included in an unclassified document provided to the Congress this last week, the title of which is ``Transitional Readiness Assessment.'' It provides seven different measurements to determine how we are doing in Iraq: first, overall readiness; second, the number of Iraqi personnel; third, their command and control capability; fourth, the level and effectiveness of their training; fifth, the sustainment and logistics of those Iraqi units; sixth, the level of their equipment; and seventh, the quality of their leadership.
It is vitally important that we share our progress or lack thereof in meeting these objectives with the American people. The American people are paying for this conflict with their money and their blood. They deserve to know how we are doing.
One of the challenges of any military effort is to build and maintain public support. To date, the administration has provided rosy assessments that conflict so clearly with the reports from Iraq and the images on television. It is no surprise that the public's patience is growing thin.
The American people can withstand adversity. What they won't stand for--and rightfully so--is being kept in the dark or being misled. That is why it is so critical that we provide the American people with an accurate assessment of our current situation, to plan for our success and let our people know and let them evaluate the progress we are achieving toward making that success.
I hope this amendment can be a bipartisan one. It seeks to achieve the twin goals of accountability and candor that I have heard embraced by our colleagues from both sides of the aisle.
In addition to this amendment, I have also introduced an amendment to provide our troops fighting in Iraq with the equipment they need in the field and the support their families deserve at home.
The Army has chronically underestimated--nine consecutive times, in fact--the need for up-armored vehicles in the Iraqi theater. Nine consecutive times they have gotten it wrong. They no longer deserve the benefit of the doubt. Regrettably, Walter Reed Hospital and our other military hospitals in this Nation are filled with too many of the young men and women who have paid the consequence for these errors. We must do everything humanly possible to make sure no further errors take place.
My armor amendment will provide enough funding to rebuild the Army stocks of up-armored HMMWVs as well as the armored vehicles used for cargo and troop transportation. With it, the military's depleted stock of armored vehicles will be made whole, ensuring that all of our troops have the protection they need while serving in both Iraq and Afghanistan--no more pleas to end hillbilly armor. One of the lessons learned in Iraq, along with the tragic Hurricane Katrina, is that when lives are at stake, it is incumbent upon us to err on the side of doing more rather than less. Let us get it right this time.
For the families of our loved ones serving in harm's way, we must ensure that no one faces financial hardship because of their service overseas. Yet there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the financial rights of service men and women are being abused or ignored. That must stop.
Guard members who are called to active duty often face what I call a patriot penalty--a pay cut representing the difference between their civilian and Active-Duty pay. As a result, many families struggle to meet their mortgage payments or pay their heating
bills. My amendment would eliminate this patriot penalty and ensure that no one takes a pay cut for serving their country.
Some families struggling with bills have even faced eviction or foreclosure despite laws already on the books designed to protect them. Financial institutions say they are not aware of these special protections, but ignorance is no excuse. My amendment would enable the regulators who oversee our financial institutions to put a stop to this odious practice. Financial institutions must learn the law, and they must follow it. My amendment will force the administration to educate our troops about their rights and punish those who wrongfully take away our troops' homes.
When we send troops into battle, we are asking them and their families to be willing to make the ultimate sacrifice. They are giving us everything. Giving them a realistic plan for success, along with the equipment they will need in the field to accomplish that success and the support their families deserve at home, is the least we can do for them. We owe it to them to do it right. That is what these amendments, when taken together, will accomplish.
I thank the Chair and my colleagues for their patience.
I call up the amendments numbered 1993, 1940, 1998, and 1933.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to call the amendments up en bloc.
By all means.
Mr. President, I would be pleased to work with my colleagues to clarify the substance of the amendments and to work on the issues regarding any of them.
I have been advised to call up my amendment No. 1933, which is an appropriations amendment.
Mr. President, I send an amendment to the desk.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that reading of the amendment be dispensed with to give us an opportunity to discuss the substance of the amendment and time consideration.
Mr. President, I would be delighted to discuss this matter with the Senator.
The heart of my concern is that there has been a consistent pattern of underestimating our need, and the depletion of the stockpile means if they yet again underestimated the need, it would not be available for quick deployment in the theater, which would leave our troops short again. That is the basis of my concern. We would be delighted to discuss it with the Senator.
I say to my friend and colleague, I look forward to conferring with him. It is neither his intentions nor his actions which I question; both his intentions and actions have been quite commendable. It is the advice of the Army which has consistently proven to be wrong, which we are relying on, that I question. That is the nature of the discussion I look forward to having.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.