I move to proceed to Calendar No. 211, S. 1569, the debt limit bill. Mr. President, the Senate will recess from 12:30 to 2:15 to allow for weekly caucus meetings. There are productive negotiations going on with the Republican leader. I am…
I move to proceed to Calendar No. 211, S. 1569, the debt limit bill.
Mr. President, the Senate will recess from 12:30 to 2:15 to allow for weekly caucus meetings.
There are productive negotiations going on with the Republican leader. I am confident we will be able to reach a compromise agreement this week in time to avert a catastrophic default on the Nation's bills. The Republican leader and I will keep our Members informed as to how negotiations are going.
I express my appreciation to everyone for their patience.
Reservation of Leadership Time
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
I appreciate my friend's always courteous attitude. I appreciate it very much.
The House Republican leadership plan that is now out--and people may look at it--is a plan to advance an extreme piece of legislation and is nothing more than a blatant attack on bipartisanship.
The past several days we have been engaged in productive bipartisan negotiations in the Senate. Everyone knows this. We have been working across party lines and making steady progress to achieve an agreement that reopens the government, protects the full faith and credit of our country, and opens talks to put this country on a firm fiscal footing. Everyone needs to know that the measure under discussion in the House is no part of what we have negotiated in the Senate.
The debt is here. The deadline is looming. Rating agencies are talking about downgrading us as early as tonight, again.
I know I speak for many of us. We have been working in good faith when I say that we felt blindsided by news from the House, but this isn't the first
time. Extremist Republicans in the House of Representatives are attempting to torpedo the Senate's bipartisan progress with a bill that can't pass the Senate--can't pass the Senate and won't pass the Senate.
The House measure would take away the President's fundamental authority that has been in existence for as long as political science can remember. It has been in place for decade after decade after decade to prevent a catastrophic default on the Nation's bills. Out of spite, tea party Republicans are trying to take authority away from President Obama. They would never, ever consider doing this if it were President Romney, President Bush, President Bush, or President Reagan. Never.
As they have said--and they have cheered on the other side--the government is closed. We don't mind defaulting on the debt. It is good for the country. That is what they have said.
Their legislation would also make unacceptable major changes to ObamaCare. The House legislation doesn't even include a process for bipartisan negotiation on a sensible long-term budget. They throw out these numbers, think magic is going to happen, and somehow when January 15 arrives, everything will be hunky-dory. There are still processes we have to follow. They set no pattern, no schedule, no routine to do that.
For weeks Republicans have claimed they want to negotiate, but their legislation completely ignores the need to work together, craft a budget, and put our country on a fiscally sustainable path.
For years they have complained about why don't we have regular order here. They complained about lack of a budget. Now they don't even want us to negotiate a budget. It is hard to comprehend this logic, but the tea-party-driven part of the Republican Party doesn't follow logic. Why would they want to close the government for 15 days, have us default on our debt?
Introduction of this measure by House Republican leadership is unproductive and a waste of time. Let us be clear: The House legislation will not pass the Senate.
This is what the White House said only a few minutes ago:
The President has said repeatedly that members of Congress
don't get to demand ransom for fulfilling their basic
responsibilities to pass a budget and pay the nation's bills.
Unfortunately, the latest proposal from House Republicans
does just that in a partisan attempt to appease a small group
of Tea Party Republicans who forced the government shutdown
in the first place.
I am very disappointed with John Boehner, who once again would try to preserve his role at the expense of the country.
I have worked hard to rise above bipartisanship and find common ground in the Senate. We have done that together for the good of the Nation. This is much bigger than the presiding Senator, who is from the State of Hawaii, or the assistant leader, who is at my side. This is much bigger than that. It is much bigger than me, it is much bigger than the two Senators on the floor who are from Connecticut. We have Senator Murray, who is chairman of the Budget Committee. It is bigger than her. It is bigger than the senior Senator from New York, Senator Schumer, who is on the floor.
We have to start working together as a country. This is what we have been trying to do. This is so disappointing. On the eve of financial destruction for this great country, this is what it is--to appease a small group of people over there. I am so disappointed.
I yield to the Senator.
Mr. President, to my friend, the senior Senator from Illinois, we have seen what has gone on these last few months, through this whole year, with a group of people who are giving press conferences, holding demonstrations. They want the government to stay closed. They wanted it closed in the first place.
The hardship we have over this country is awful. If that is not good enough, they are boasting they want the country to fail its obligations to pay its bills.
These are not new programs. These are obligations we have. That is one of the problems. The proposal they have would not allow--for example, my friend is the chair of what some say is the most important part of the Federal Government, to protect the safety and security of the United States, the subcommittee dealing with defense that was led many decades by Senator Dan Inouye. The proposal they have sent gives the President of the United States, the Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff, no flexibility whatsoever when sequestration kicks in on the 15th.
We are not asking to change those numbers. We agreed to those numbers. We voted to approve those numbers, but they won't even allow flexibility to allow the Department of Defense to shift that money around. I do not know how the defense of this country can go forward if they don't have flexibility with losing $22 billion beginning January 15. They don't even give authority for that.
The bill they are sending over is doomed to failure. It is doomed to failure legislatively and it is so awful for our country.