Floor Statements

Mr. President, what we do on the Senate floor has consequences far beyond this building. We know our work has real world costs, far beyond the beltway. But it is not just what we do that touches our constituents' lives and livelihoods, it is also what we do not do. When the Senate refuses to pass good bills, the people in our States pay the price. I hope we can avoid more of that this week and we can come together and work productively.

Right now, loopholes reward corporations for shipping jobs out of America, putting them out of reach of the many unemployed workers in each of our States. Every day we do not act, the loopholes remain wide open, those jobs vanish, and those we represent get hurt.

Right now, small businesses are desperate for tax incentives to create jobs at home. Every day we don't act, those small businesses have a harder time hiring, and the unemployment rate has a harder time falling.

Right now, Nevada's unemployment rate is the highest in the country. Victims of the recession who have been

out of work for a long time are struggling to make ends meet while they are looking for a job. This bill extends the emergency unemployment assistance they need, critical help that, for many, has expired or dried up.

Every day we don't act, those families in Nevada and across the Nation continue to suffer unnecessary pain. This will be the eighth week since March the Senate has debated the tax-cutting, job-creating bill currently on the Senate floor. That is 2 full months, 2 full months we have been waiting and they have been waiting--the people in our States--for us to respond to an emergency. That is unacceptable.

The richest corporations continue to get richer while the unemployed remain out of work. Every minute we waste, it gets worse. It is our job to debate and not to delay. It is our job to legislate; it is our job to do something about the plight of the people in America. We need to legislate relief.

As we serve our citizens, it would serve the Senate well to remember the consequences of decisions that are driven by politics, purely, and the consequences of our actions and our inaction alike.

If I can just interrupt my friend for a minute, does the Senator have some consent agreements he wants to do or would he rather I come back?

I will just wait. I am happy to be here.

Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I realize very much the financial situation our country finds itself in today. Everyone on this side of the aisle recognizes that. We also recognize the fact that the problems dealing with the economy were not created by the Democrats or even President Obama. The problems were created by virtue of 8 years of wild spending by a prior administration, a war costing $1 trillion that was unpaid for, and tax cuts amounting to more than $1 trillion, unpaid for, that caused this huge recession.

President Obama has been doing his best, working with us to get our way out of that financial situation in which we find ourselves. I am very amazed at the logic of my friends on the other side of the aisle suddenly seeing fiscal austerity as the way to go when the wild spending went on for 8 years without a word having been spoken.

We are doing everything we can to make sure the country continues on an upward scale. It has now. We have a long ways to go. But as economists say, the hemorrhaging has stopped, and we are trying to work our way into a vibrant economy. We are a long ways from that, and I recognize that.

In today's newspaper a number of columnists are talking about being very careful what we do. We are very aware of the pain people are feeling out there; for example, those people who are unemployed, long- term unemployed. As I have said on this floor before, Mark Zandi--John McCain's financial adviser when he ran for President--has said the most important thing we can do is give those people unemployment benefits because it goes right back into the economy and helps the economy.

A Nobel Prize-winning economist writes a column several times a week in the New York Times. Today he talks about the fact that we have to be very careful how we rein in spending. We know we have to do it, but we have to be very careful doing it.

In 1937, after we had pulled our way out of the economic crisis we found ourselves in, spending was reined in too quickly and it caused the country to go back into, not a depression but a recession. World War II saved our country financially in that regard.

I know my friend's heart is in the right place, but his logic is in the wrong place, and I object.

Mr. President, my friend says he has never seen anything like this. Well, I have never seen anything like this reasoning. Everyone knows that President Obama did not cause the oil gushing into the ocean, and he has done his utmost to try to alleviate the pain and suffering of the people in the gulf. He had the good fortune of getting the company responsible for this oil gushing out of the ocean to come up with a $20 billion trust fund to pay the people who suffered. There were some Republicans last week who said they thought it was wrong for the President to do that. But that was a very small minority who believed that. I have never seen anything like this. So President Obama is not responsible for the oil gushing out of the Earth into the ocean, and President Obama is not responsible for the severe recession that hit this country in the last few months of the Bush administration.

I cannot imagine anyone thinking we should not have taken the measures we did to help bolster the economy. The economic recovery package created millions of jobs. There is still money in the pipeline to create more jobs. And as it says in this one op-ed piece in the New York Times today:

And some of the most vocal deficit scolds in Congress are

working hard to reduce taxes for the handful of lucky

Americans who are heirs to multimillion-dollar estates. This

would do nothing for the economy now, but it will reduce

revenue by billions of dollars a year, permanently.

It will be interesting to see in the next few weeks how these same budget hawks feel about the estate taxes that we have to address. I would hope we can all be calm and deliberate here. We have a few weeks left. We have 2 weeks in this week period, 4 or 5 the next work period to get some things done here.

We have appropriations bills we have to do. We have these tax extenders we have been working on, as I indicated, for 8 weeks. We have the unemployment benefits we need to extend. People are now desperate for that money. We have also something to help States called FMAP, which helps for Medicaid, which has been such a drain on the States because of the tremendous problems we have had with people being out of work and needing to go on Medicaid because there is no place else for them to go for health care.

I would hope we can move forward on the legislation that we tried try to finish last week. I am grateful we were able to finally get the short-term fix on the patients who are Medicare recipients. Now if we can get something done in the House there, doctors will be able to be reimbursed not at the fat and sassy rate, but at least it will be better than the 21-percent cut that was going to go into effect today or tomorrow.

I announce that the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Bayh), the Senator from West Virginia (Mr. Byrd), the Senator from Illinois (Mr. Durbin), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Nelson), and the Senator from Oregon (Mr. Wyden) are necessarily absent.

I announce that the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Bayh), the Senator from West Virginia (Mr. Byrd), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Nelson), and the Senator from Oregon (Mr. Wyden) are necessarily absent.

Madam President, the Republican leader is correct. He has submitted a list of names. We have exchanged those with our respective staffs. I appreciate it very much. I have had one issue I have had to work through, and he has been very considerate on not moving forward on any consent request until I get this worked out. I think we will be able to do that tonight--if not, the first thing in the morning. So I appreciate very much our being able to move forward. I think we can do it as early as tomorrow morning--at least sometime tomorrow early.

Madam President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. President, within the next few minutes, in Johannesburg, South Africa, before almost 80,000 people, the U.S. soccer team will begin its World Cup quest. They are going to be playing Slovenia, which has the fewest citizens of any of the participating countries. So I wish all the athletes representing our country success in today's match.

I also want to take a minute and talk about a Nevadan who is on our team. His name is Herculez Gomez. He is a graduate of Las Vegas public schools. He was, of course, an outstanding high school athlete. He played professionally here in America, but the team decided not to sign him--Kansas City--to anything he was satisfied with, so he went to Mexico to play. He became the No. 1 player in Mexico. He holds the record for scoring more goals than any person, as I understand it, who has played for another team in that country.

He is a great young man, and we are very proud of him. He is a great goal scorer, a terrific representative of Nevada and the United States in this tournament watched by billions of people around the world. He didn't play in our first game. He was standing on the sidelines. The coach had told him to go in, but soccer is an unusual game. It is not like a lot of sports. It is very difficult to substitute in a soccer game, and the referee didn't blow the whistle or stop the game, so he couldn't go in. But he will be in this game, I am sure.

I am a great soccer fan. I often boast about my youngest son, who played on three national championship soccer teams for the University of Virginia. Anyway, I watch soccer closely.

I wish the next remarks of mine could be as pleasant as those I have just given regarding Herculez Gomez. I wish we could have a lot more pleasant talk here in the Senate. But with what happened last night and what has happened for the last year and a half, it is very hard to be pleasant when you have people who are hurting in America.

Unemployment is something that is difficult to understand unless you have been unemployed. I have never been unemployed. I am very fortunate. From the time I was a boy until now, I have always had a job, even in the summers. I worked as a very young boy, starting when I was very, very

young. But I have seen my dad trying to get a job and not able to find work. My father was a strong young man during the depression, and I heard him tell the story many times that he would go to a mine where they were going to hire some people, and they would line up the people who were prospective workers, and one of the bosses would come out and he would go down the line and say: I will take you, I will take you, and I will take you. I guess how they looked is all they had to base it on. They had no applications. No one filed applications.

Well, even though it is not the Great Depression, we now have people going through the same thing my father went through. I heard on NPR this morning on the way to work that a woman has been out of work for a year and a half. She was hired once for 1 day. She has applied 150 different times. She keeps a notebook of the places she has applied and what happens to each of those. She is going to a job fair today, hoping something will happen and she can get a job.

The American people have had it with those who create messes and then refuse to take responsibility for cleaning them up. They are tired of the excuses. They are sick of the misplaced priorities that say one party's politics are more important than their jobs or families, their incomes and their savings.

If you want to know what we stand for on this side of the aisle-- Democrats--look at our agenda this year. And our agenda has been so difficult because, without exception, everything we have tried to do has been stalled. The Republicans have made every attempt to divert our attention from what we want to do.

Here is what our agenda has been: making health insurance more affordable and health insurance companies more accountable. What kind of a country would we be if we had stood silently while 50 million of our fellow men and women had no health insurance? That is where we were. If you had a job, a good job, you might have had insurance, but that was no guarantee either. People were losing their insurance by the millions as time went on. So we did something that had to be done-- health insurance.

We protected Americans' savings and seniors' pensions from Wall Street greed, making sure the American people were never again asked to bail out a big bank. Although we were stymied every step of the way, we worked to stop these people on Wall Street from doing again what they did to the American people.

During part of my career--in fact, for 4 years--I was chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission. Now, that isn't about hunting animals; it is a gambling commission. We call it gaming. We did everything we could to make sure people who came to Nevada and gambled on the tables in Las Vegas or Reno or Lake Tahoe had a fair game. When they won money, they got to keep it; when they lost, it was their money they lost. But Wall Street had a much better deal than you can get anyplace in Nevada. On Wall Street, they gambled away our money. If they won, they kept it; if they lost, they came to us for help. So we took that on. That bill is in conference now, and we are going to come out with something the American people will like very much.

We have worked hard to create jobs. Today, Joe Biden is announcing the 10,000th highway project that has been funded from our stimulus or economic recovery bill. So we have created jobs, including full-time work for 3 million Americans who have the stimulus to thank for the job they are going to today.

In Nevada, the Recovery Act has created or saved more than 4,000 jobs in just the past 4 months alone. The economy in Nevada is not in good shape. It is getting better, but it is not good. We are one of the leading States in the Union in unemployment. But think how much worse it would be if we hadn't been able to create these jobs in Nevada with the recovery bill.

Our agenda has been making sure those still looking for jobs in Nevada--where 14 percent are out of work--and people across the country have the unemployment assistance they need to make ends meet in the meantime. Why the Republicans would not allow people who are out of work to collect unemployment compensation is hard for me to comprehend. John McCain's chief economic adviser when he ran for President is a man named Mark Zandi, and Mark Zandi said the No. 1 way to stimulate the economy is to give people who are out of work some money--unemployment assistance. The Republicans rejected the advice of John McCain's chief economic adviser; we followed it.

In our legislation, we cut taxes for families and businesses. Ninety- five percent of the people in America, as a result of our stimulus bill, the economic recovery bill, got a tax cut.

We have helped small businesses grow and hire more workers in the last bill we passed dealing with jobs. And we would have been happy to do more, but we get stalled every time we try to do something. Remember that bill? We had four things in it:

We extended the highway bill for a year. That saved a million jobs in America. Hundreds and hundreds of jobs were saved in Nevada. Thousands were saved in Minnesota, the Presiding Officer's State.

In that same legislation, we said that if a small business wants to buy something for their business--let's assume they need a new vehicle or equipment of any kind--they didn't have to even depreciate it anymore; that up to $250,000 they can write off. That was to help small business.

We also said that if someone is out of work for 60 days and someone is willing to give them a job for 30 hours a week--we didn't set how much they would have to be paid, but if they give them a job for 30 hours a week, then that employer doesn't have to pay the withholding tax, and at the end of that year, they get a $1,000 tax credit.

In addition to that, we decided that one of the things that worked so well in the recovery bill was Build America Bonds. That was very successful and so popular that we ran out of money. In this little jobs bill, we funded that again. Right now, as we speak, there are jobs all over America taking place as a result of what we did with that bill.

So we have done a lot of things to help small businesses. We have in that bill and we tried yesterday to give our States the critical aid they need to keep firefighters in our communities, police officers on the streets, and teachers in the classrooms. But Republicans said: No. Let the States handle their own problems. We have problems back here; don't worry about the States.

I learned a long time ago in college that one of our responsibilities back here as a Congress is to do things for the States they can't do for themselves. That is what we are doing here. But the Republicans said no yesterday. And it wasn't the majority of them, it was every single one of them.

We have worked hard to protect doctors who treat senior citizens from a massive pay cut created by the Republicans when they were in charge. Now there are going to be seniors who won't be able to find their doctor of choice because the doctors simply can't afford to work under what the Republicans decided they should be paid. They will take a pay cut. They will only get 79 percent of the money they got yesterday for the same treatment.

As part of our agenda this year--and I am not going to go through it all because Norm Ornstein, a famous journalist, said we have been the most productive Congress in the history of the country, in spite of what was going on here, despite the secret holds, the filibusters, the stalling, the delay; according to Norm Ornstein and others, the most productive Congress in the history of the country.

As part of our agenda we believe we should hold BP accountable for the sickening environmental disaster caused by its own gross negligence and maybe criminal activity in the endless pursuit of profits. One of the richest companies in the world cut corners so they could make more money.

Those are a few of the things we stand for. We stand for those things because we know we work for families, taxpayers, and hard-working Americans. But as far as I can tell, the only thing Republicans stand for is standing together. As far as anyone can see, Republicans come to work each day to fight for their special-interest friends, for corporate America, for multimillionaires, for billionaires, and for greedy CEOs who ship jobs out of

America. Remember, part of the legislation they turned down yesterday was going to stop all of that.

The trends are unmistakable. The records are public. I am not making up a thing. They are public, and numbers do not lie. It is not hard to piece together the puzzle and see who is working for the American people and who is working against them.

But you do not have to comb through voting records; just look at what happened yesterday. In the morning Republicans apologized to BP. Listen to this. Republicans apologized to BP. One of the longstanding Republican leaders in the House of Representatives said he was sorry that President Obama had asked them to come up with $20 billion. We wrote a letter to BP. The idea started with us, Democratic Senators. The President picked this up. He met with the head of BP and they said OK, we will do that. The Republicans in the House said it was a shakedown and they were embarrassed for our country that this had happened. Try that one on. Whose side are the Republicans on?

I heard an interview where a man said 9/11 did not ruin my business, Katrina didn't ruin my business, but the oilspill has ruined my business. I filed bankruptcy yesterday. And it is a shakedown?

I repeat, yesterday morning Republicans apologized to BP for holding them accountable for their own recklessness and their own greed. I repeat that because it is incredible: Republicans apologized to BP because we are making sure it pays for its mess and the taxpayers do not have to pay for their mess.

In the evening Republicans voted to help the wealthiest of the wealthy avoiding paying their fair share of taxes, while at the same time voting against giving out-of-work Americans the assistance they need.

I have friends who are billionaires. They run these big companies. With rare exception, they have come to me and said yes, we have a pretty good deal. Do you know why it is a pretty good deal? Because they pay less taxes than somebody who works for the minimum wage. The Republicans are going to continue to allow my friends, and billionaires around the country, to continue to pay less taxes than someone who works for minimum wage. What kind of a picture is that?

Their priorities are baffling to me. They are indefensible. But it is even harder to believe when you look at who got us into this mess and who is now refusing to let us get out of this mess. The same people. Why are the doctors getting a 21-percent pay cut? It is because of what they did over here. Why are so many people out of work? It is because of the policies of the prior administration--it is what went on on Wall Street, cutting the legs off of the American economy. So the people who got us into the mess are the ones who are doing everything they can to make sure that we do not get out of the mess.

If not for the years of failed Republican policies, high unemployment would not be an issue in the first place. If not for the Republican failed policies, there would not be a doctors payment problem in the first place. If not for the Republicans' disdain for sensible oversight, the disasters from Wall Street to the Gulf of Mexico, to communities across America, might not have been so devastating. And if not for the weeks and weeks of Republican delay, the emergencies in our households and businesses and big cities and small towns wouldn't be nearly as bad as they are.

Republicans might be willing to turn their backs on out-of-work Americans but Democrats are not. We are not. We are going to keep fighting for them. We are not going to give up.

As I said earlier, the American people have had it with those who create messes and then refuse to take responsibility for cleaning them up. That goes for BP and the GOP.

I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 210, H.R. 3962; that the Baucus substitute amendment, which is at the desk, be considered agreed to, and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table; that the bill, as amended, be read a third time, passed, and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table; that the title amendment, which is at the desk, be considered and agreed to, and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table; that any statements related to this measure be printed in the Record, with no further intervening action or debate.

Mr. President, sometimes the Senate can be terribly disconcerting and aggravating, but that is the way the Senate is. Those are the rules we work under. I love the Senate. Every day that goes by, I understand there are times I am aggravated and disconcerted, but the vast majority of the time I am amazed how we are able to get work done.

I say through the Presiding Officer to my friend, the Republican leader, I am glad we were able to work out this legislation. This is extremely important for everybody, and we are going to move on with the rest of the bill and try to finish that as early as possible.

Mr. President, this year has been an extremely difficult year. No one has been more involved in everything we have done here than my friend from Montana. In true times of crisis--and we have had plenty of crises in the last 18 months, and he and I had a relationship before that. In the last 18 months, we were in the trenches together to work through some big problems we have here legislatively. Because of his responsibility as chairman of the Finance Committee, much of the burden of what goes on in the Senate is on his shoulders. He has broad shoulders and a wonderful staff. I enjoy working with him, and I enjoy his friendship.

Mr. President, as if in Executive Session, I ask unanimous consent that on Monday, June 21, the Senate proceed to executive session at 5:15 p.m. and debate concurrently until 6 p.m. Calendar No. 777, Mark Goldsmith; No. 778, Marc Treadwell; and No. 779, Josephine Tucker; that the time between 5:15 p.m. and 6 p.m. be equally divided and controlled between Senators Leahy and Sessions or their designees; that at 6 p.m., the Senate proceed to vote on confirmation of the nominations in the order listed; that there be 2 minutes of debate, equally divided, prior to any votes after the first; with succeeding votes limited to 10 minutes each; that upon confirmation, the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table, the President be immediately notified of the Senate's action and the Senate then resume legislative session.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate now proceed to H. Con. Res. 242.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the concurrent resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, the motions to reconsider be laid upon the table, with no intervening action or debate, and any statements relating to this matter be printed in the Record.

The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 242) was agreed to.

Mr. President, I believe H.R. 5297 has been received from the House and is now at the desk.

I ask for its first reading.

Mr. President, I now ask for its second reading but object to my own request.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate completes its business today, it adjourn until 2 p.m. on Monday, June 21; that following the prayer and pledge, the Journal of proceedings be approved to date, the morning hour be deemed expired, the time for the two leaders be reserved for their use later in the day; and following any leader remarks, there be a period of morning business until 5:15 p.m., with Senators permitted to speak for up to 10 minutes each, with no motions in order; that following morning business, the Senate proceed to executive session as provided for under the previous order.

Mr. President, at approximately 6 p.m. on Monday, the Senate will proceed to a series of up to three rollcall votes. Those votes will be on the confirmation of several district court nominations.

Mr. President, if there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous order.