Mr. President, before my friend leaves the floor, I have had the opportunity to listen to not all but 80 percent of what he said. I had meetings going on in my office, and I had not been able to watch it all. As the distinguished Senator…
Mr. President, before my friend leaves the floor, I have had the opportunity to listen to not all but 80 percent of what he said. I had meetings going on in my office, and I had not been able to watch it all.
As the distinguished Senator from New Jersey knows, I have locked arms with Congressman and now Senator from New Jersey for many years. In fact, my votes in years past have not always been in the majority, but they have always been something I felt comfortable doing and still feel comfortable doing.
I appreciate the statement made by my friend from New Jersey. I am committed to work with him to see what
we can do to resolve the injustice that is taking place 90 miles off the shore of America and, once and for all, give those people who live in Las Vegas--people do not realize the largest number of Cuban Americans live in Florida, next is New Jersey, and, surprisingly, next is Nevada.
I worked with my friends there, Tony Alamo and many others, over the years to try to bring justice to an unjust system. I appreciate very much the statement made by my friend from New Jersey. I look forward to working with him on all other issues.
Yes.
Mr. President, Virginia, Nevada, New Jersey, and the other 47 States are well served by my friend from New Jersey.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate resumes consideration of H.R. 1105 tomorrow, Tuesday, March 3, the time until 11:45 a.m. be for debate with respect to the McCain amendment No. 592, with the time equally divided and controlled between Senators Inouye and McCain or their designees, with no amendment in order to the amendment prior to a vote in relation to the amendment; that at 11:45 a.m., the Senate proceed to a vote in relation to the amendment No. 592.
Mr. President, while I have two of my Republican colleagues on the floor, and others, of course, listening, I have been told by the Republican leadership there is a number of extremely important amendments from the minority's perspective. No. 1 is this amendment that Senator McCain has offered. Another one that comes to my mind is one that a number of people on the other side of the aisle have talked about often, which would lower the amount of spending to the CR level. I do not how much money that is. So we are waiting for someone to offer that.
We heard a presentation made by Senator Wicker this afternoon that he has an abortion-related amendment. We understand Senator Vitter has an abortion-related amendment. I have had several conversations today with Dr. Coburn, and he has been very constructive in working with us in coming up with four amendments, none of which I like. But there are four amendments, and we are going to work our way through these, where people have ample time to talk about them, as soon as we can.
But I thought it was important, before we have our caucus tomorrow, to at least get this one amendment the minority feels very strongly about. We will work our way through this and see what happens tomorrow.
There is no end to amendments that could be offered on this bill. This is a very big bill. It is nine subcommittees. I hope everyone would focus on what would happen if we could pass this bill. It would be good for the institution. We could get back to a process where we do 12 individual appropriations bills. That would be so important because this is not the way to legislate, having these great big bills. We have done it in the last several years, and it is not in keeping with--I am no longer a member of the Appropriations Committee, but I was on the Appropriations Committee for a quarter of a century, or something like that. It is a wonderful committee. But it has not been doing the job it is supposed to do for this institution.
So I hope we, by the end of this week, can pass this omnibus bill. I want to make sure the minority has the opportunity to offer amendments. But as I have indicated, there will come a time sometime when we will have to stop amending and try to get the matter passed. But that will come at a later time.
Mr. President, I am happy to.
The answer, through the Chair to my friend from South Dakota, is, yes, we are going to try to get to as many amendments as we can. With a bill as complex as this, we cannot stack up endless amendments, so we are going to have to work out a process where if we stack amendments, they will have to be few in number. And ``few'' is in the eye of the beholder. But the answer to the Senator's question: There is no reason that I know of--I do not know the subject matter of the Senator's amendment or amendments--but I have no reason to believe that we should not be able to get to his amendment.
The point I am trying to make is, we are not trying to avoid voting on tough amendments. I have outlined to you some pretty difficult amendments. Dr. Coburn did not think up his amendments riding the subway over from his office in one of the office buildings. A lot of thought has gone into his amendments, and they are very difficult amendments. I would like to avoid them, but I do not see any reason how I can do that. So in answer: I repeat, there will be time for amendments. It is just a question of when there will be enough time. Certainly tomorrow. And I hope we can work through these on Wednesday and have a better feel where we need to go.
Mr. President, I have been told we can do what we call wrap-up. It will take a minute or two. If my friend from Tennessee would withhold, we will rip right through this.