Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. Madam President, we have tried hard to arrive at another compromise. I do not know how--it would be physically impossible for us--to do any more than…
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Madam President, we have tried hard to arrive at another compromise. I do not know how--it would be physically impossible for us--to do any more than what I have suggested. I have said, when told that the negotiators needed more time, we will wait until after the farm bill and go after this issue. Objected to. I was called by my friends on the other side of the aisle yesterday, who said: Can we have a little more time? I said: Sure.
I came today and said let's finish this matter this coming Monday. Let's finish it after the farm bill. And both times there was an objection.
I have met with Senators Hatch and Grassley on many occasions. On every occasion I can think of Senator Baucus has been there, and in some of those meetings Senator Rockefeller has been present. The four of us have had a significant number of meetings with the Speaker, with Chairman Dingell, and Chairman Rangel.
I went down at 20 after 2 today and met with a number of Republican House Members, relaying to them--and I have no doubt that they would acknowledge this--that we have tried to work with them in coming up with something.
Now, I explained to them the Senate rules. If I wanted to not have this cloture vote, I couldn't stop it. It takes unanimous consent to move from our doing this. I explained that to them. But I did tell them this, and I will say to you and those within the sound of my voice what I told those freshmen. I believe the negotiations that have taken place in this matter have been in good faith. There has been no bad faith by the participants.
The burden has been borne by the chairman of the Finance Committee, Senator Baucus, and the ranking member, Senator Grassley. Senator Hatch, who was the original sponsor of this bill, with Senator Kennedy, has been involved from the very beginning. Senator Hatch was at the meeting where I met with House Republicans. Senator Baucus was there, and I repeat what I told them. If we can't do something now, and we send the bill to the President and he vetoes it, I don't think we should rush forward and try to override his veto. I think we should just let things simmer a little while.
I told them if they could come up with something that we can work with--I spoke to the Speaker this morning, and I said: I am not sure we can move much further.
She said: You should see the changes they want to make. There is very little. There isn't much that they want--which was comforting to me. And that is what the House Members told me today when I met with them this afternoon.
So I would hope people understand that good-faith negotiations have taken place on a bipartisan, bicameral basis on this most important piece of legislation. I am not happy with the President on this issue. I think he is making a big mistake. I think he is hurting some of his House Members, who could be in a very precarious position as a result of voting no to overriding his veto, but that is the decision they have made. And I am willing to try to get them out of the hole I think some of them are in.
Yesterday the President came from left field. Talk about a sucker punch. He suddenly said: I don't like the way this is paid for.
We are paying for it. It is not deficit spending. We are taking care of this with a relatively small tax on cigarettes and cigars. That surprised everybody. It surprised everybody that the President now, when he learned that we had changed things--got adults off the program, changed its to limit waivers, tightened down the immigration issue. We did everything he asked us to do, and now he changes the program again.
We are at a point now where the President does not become relevant to this issue because in the bipartisan, bicameral work that we have done between the House and the Senate, we want to do this ourselves, so that when we come to a decision on what we can do, and I think we are within days of doing that, we will bring this bill back. The Speaker said she would do it; I said I would do it.
I express my appreciation to the courtesies extended to me by Senators Grassley and Hatch on the Republican side and the extreme patience of Senator Baucus for allowing the many different diversions that we have had in getting to the point where we are today. With the understanding and the hope that we can move forward on this bill, and even though some of these programs are going to change drastically by March because there will be as many as 11 States that will run out of money, hopefully in the next few weeks we can change this legislation and still insure 10 million children and maintain a program that is reasonable for the States and certainly the children we are trying to protect.
So I again express my appreciation to the participants of the many involved in the negotiations, and I want to also reach out my hand in friendship to the Speaker. There isn't a Democrat or Republican, including Senators Grassley and Hatch, who would not say publicly how willing she has been to try to work to come to some reasonable conclusion of this legislation. She has been great, as has Chairman Rangel and Chairman Dingell.
Madam President, I yield the floor. Is there anyone on the floor who wants to take the remaining time? Good.
I yield to my friend, the distinguished Senator from Florida.
Madam President, we are going to have a vote in just a few minutes. I know people have things to do. This will be the last vote this week. But I alert all Members, we have had a number of meetings today with Senator McConnell. We are trying to work it out so we do not have to have cloture on the motion to proceed to the farm bill.
I understand that the minority has to take a look at the amendment to the bill that has come out of the committee and was all ready to go and the Finance Committee needed to make some changes on it. That should be back from Legislative Counsel in just a matter of minutes--at least we hope that is the case.
If we do not have to do cloture on the motion to proceed, there will be no votes on Monday. If we do have to do a vote on the motion to proceed, there will be a noon vote on the motion to proceed on Monday, and we will have to do that; otherwise, we will come in and go to the farm bill Tuesday around 2 o'clock in the afternoon so the managers can give their opening statements, and anyone who wants to speak on the bill. There are going to be lots of opening statements on the farm bill, so I would hope people would come early and get those out of the way.
There are a number of people who have expressed to me--who have warned me that there are going to be some amendments on that bill. We are going to have to make sure we do this the right way. We want to make sure there are amendments that are offered. We will have to take a look at them because it is late in the session and the farm bill is a tax bill. So we have to make sure we do not get into any issues we do not need to get into. But we will be as fair as we can possibly be on the farm bill. It is a bill we have to complete.
Also during the next 2 weeks, we have to get the first appropriations bill to the President. I had a very constructive conversation with Josh Bolton today regarding what will happen when we get that bill to him. We also have other important business to do, such as making sure the Government is funded after November 16.
So we have a very busy week. The President has indicated that probably tomorrow he is going to veto WRDA. We will have to take a look at that.
If there is no cloture vote, we will be on the bill Monday for opening statements, as I indicated. We have a productive farm bill.
I wish to express my appreciation to everyone for the work on the children's health bill. I will repeat what I said before the vote: There has been bicameral, bipartisan work on the CHIP bill--bicameral, bipartisan work. At 2:20 today, I went and met with a number of House Republicans trying to move forward on the children's health initiative. It is my recommendation that this bill will be sent to the President. If he vetoes the bill, it is my recommendation--I will express my feelings to the Speaker--that we not even attempt a veto override.
My Republican colleagues--this is difficult for me to be talking about: I should not say ``difficult.'' It is unusual for me to be talking about my Republican House colleagues. But they indicated that would be the very best step forward. We are very close to being able to do a bipartisan, bicameral children's health bill. I think we can really do that. I have spoken to the Speaker. She believes that is the case, also. If we can do that, at the earliest opportunity, we will bring that back for consideration of the Senators.
I express my appreciation to Senator Baucus, Senator Rockefeller, Senator Grassley, Senator Hatch, and many others. This has been a very difficult but rewarding process for me. It indicates to me that there is the ability of this Congress to work on a bipartisan, bicameral basis, and until we accept that as a truth, we are going to have trouble moving these many bills we have bouncing around here to completion.