Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the subject of my Special Order. Madam Speaker, tonight, I am pleased to be joined by…
Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the subject of my Special Order.
Madam Speaker, tonight, I am pleased to be joined by many of my colleagues in the Congressional Progressive Caucus to talk about the long overdue investment we would need to make in the care economy, something that our infrastructure has always relied upon.
I introduced the Care for All Agenda earlier this spring calling for the Federal Government to dramatically expand and strengthen the care economy.
The American Families Plan outlines the next step we need to take to get there, which must include improving work conditions and compensation for care workers nationwide.
The care economy impacts all of us: Our children, elderly loved ones, family members with disabilities, childcare workers, home health aides, nurses, and so many more. Care is something we all need at different stages in our lives.
The care economy includes our essential workers who put their lives on the line every day during the most devastating global pandemic in a century. Many of us will be caregivers ourselves, if we haven't been one yet.
Ask any working family about how hard it has been to find affordable, quality childcare even before COVID.
Ask a childcare worker if they can afford to send their own child to the center they work at.
Ask any one of the vast majority of workers who do not have paid family and medical leave how hard it is to care for a loved one who is ill while holding on to their job.
Ask anyone who qualifies for long-term care under Medicaid but has been unable to access it due to the healthcare workforce shortage.
Ask a home health aide how much they make hourly, and the need to redesign our care infrastructure will become abundantly clear.
Just as our physical infrastructure is crumbling, the United States today suffers from a lack of care infrastructure. These two truths are intertwined.
Our crumbling infrastructure disproportionately harms Black, Brown, Indigenous and low-income communities. The negative health impacts arising from fossil fuel use, industrial pollution, and toxic materials in our homes and schools are literally making us sick.
We need to invest in eliminating carbon emissions, and we also need to invest in the caregivers we are counting on to heal us now.
We are calling for a broader shift to a society based on care for the people, communities, and the planet we share.
We are still grieving more than 600,000 lives lost to COVID in our country, many of them caregivers themselves. In this last year, we saw how badly we need a robust care economy and what happens when our investment in care doesn't match our needs.
I know that for some, talking about caregiving as infrastructure sounds like a new idea and a ``nice to have.'' None of this work is new, and all of it is necessary.
I have heard directly from New Yorkers who rely on caregivers every day; like a constituent of mine in Westchester, who was born with diastrophic dysplasia, and wrote in about how we need to do better by our caregivers and pay them a living wage. Now in her fifties, she qualifies for Medicaid and needs home-based care. The home health aide who cares for her has to work two additional jobs to make ends meet. That should give us all pause.
One of the biggest champions for caregivers and domestic workers, Ai- jen Poo, said that: ``The definition of infrastructure is that which enables society and the economy to function. So
what is more fundamental than the ability to take care of our loved ones?''
Caregiving is almost always provided by women, especially Black and Brown women. This work has historically been made invisible, which creates opportunities for the exploitation and poverty wages many of our caregivers face without protection or recourse.
When it comes to finding care, millions of families are left with no option but to figure it out, which we know so often means women not taking paid work in order to provide unpaid care for their own families.
The American Families Plan will help us bring the care economy out of the shadows with key investments in childcare, paid leave, Medicaid, home and community-based services, and more.
This goes so much deeper than making it possible for families to enter and remain in the workforce. We need to ask ourselves what kind of systems and structures we want in place not only for people to survive, but also to thrive and reach their full potential.
Given how common it is to need care and not get it, we must ask ourselves: Are we, as a nation, structured to listen? Are we structured to care?
We need to listen to the caregivers and the families who rely on them so that we make the most powerful investments that will not only boost our economy, but also allow us to heal and truly move forward as a society.
We need to rebuild our Nation with a new foundation; a foundation rooted in love, care, and equality. That is the kind of thinking we need in the infrastructure package.
Madam Speaker, I am pleased to yield to my other colleagues who will highlight other critical care economy needs. I yield to the gentlewoman from Washington (Ms. Jayapal), the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano), my friend.
Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Evans), my friend.
Madam Speaker, I now yield to the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. Omar), my friend.
Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Hawaii (Mr. Kahele), my brother.
Thank you so much, Mr. Kahele. I now yield to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Levin).
I now yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois (Ms. Schakowsky).
Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Massachusetts (Ms. Pressley), my friend and sister.
Madam Speaker, the American Families Plan recognizes that childcare is infrastructure, and that it is not enough to settle for any childcare that enables a parent to go to work. This needs to be high-quality childcare that every child can access.
Babies are born learners, and it is well established by brain science that a child's environment and interactions in the first 1,000 days of life, whether positive or negative and long before they enter a kindergarten classroom, are highly formative during this critical period for learning and growth.
When those formative early childhood experiences include inadequate nutrition, homelessness on other adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs, such as those brought on by a global pandemic, we know that a child's brain and body are changed in ways that are linked to poor health and learning outcomes later in life.
Without reliable supports in place to buffer our kids from the stress, that stress can quickly turn toxic.
The good news is that ACEs are preventable on a national scale if we are collectively willing to put in the investment worthy of our kids.
As the Representative for New York's 16th District and a former educator and school leader, I believe our goal for healthy early childhood development needs to be more ambitious than the prevention of ACEs, which aims to protect our kids from the worse effects of stress and trauma. That should be the floor.
We, ourselves, need to move past a scarcity framework and embrace a framework of shared abundance.
That looks like affordable, reliable access to quality childcare where young children, in the context of an intergenerational community, are empowered to explore themselves and their world with pure wonder; where they grow into self-directed learners, collaborative leaders, and adaptive community-centered problem solvers.
Madam Speaker, I now would like to speak a little bit about the child tax
credit. The child tax credit has been in place for years, and it is supposed to help offset the many expenses of raising children. This includes food, childcare, diapers, healthcare, clothing, and taxes.
But before the American Rescue Plan, it wasn't accessible to the families who needed it most because it wasn't fully refundable. Families that didn't earn enough income could not benefit.
The American Rescue Plan changed that when it enacted a much-needed expansion of the child tax credit, making it fully refundable and increasing the maximum credit from $2,000 per child to $3,000 per child up through age 17, and $3,600 per child for children under age 6.
Because of the American Rescue Plan, nearly 66 million children will benefit from the child tax credit, making this the single largest contributor to reducing child poverty.
In my district, which includes the Bronx and Westchester, 124,400 children will gain from the expanded child tax credit.
The average benefit for 41,800 households in my district is $2,800, lifting 9,200 children out of poverty and 4,700 children out of deep poverty.
This is historic, but we can't be satisfied with reducing child poverty. We need to completely end child poverty and eliminate it.
The American Families Plan would extend the child tax credit increases from the American Rescue Plan through 2025. The infrastructure we want for building back better shouldn't tolerate childhood poverty, and the American Families Plan moves us forward on that necessary path.
Before I close, I want to use my time on the House floor to share the experience of a New Yorker who needs home care services and wrote into my office. Her experience seeking care paints a very telling picture about the state of our care economy, and makes the case for the strong investments in the American Families Plan that we have heard tonight.
She shared that seniors and people with disabilities like her struggle to find the home care she needs because the job pays under $13 an hour in most of New York State.
One week into the COVID lockdown, her home health aide contracted the virus from a relative, a nursing home worker who contracted it through their own caregiving job.
The first health aide has been unable to return to work because the virus has caused long-term complications from their immediate family members, for whom they are the primary caregiver.
Just 1 week after her first health aide contracted the virus, a second health aide fell ill.
While the second health aide did recover, the health aide's childcare provider closed permanently.
The second health aide wants to return to work, but, due to the low wages, they are unable to afford childcare.
Not being able to find a full-time health aide to provide her care means she is unable to receive assistance with all of her needs. Some days she only gets help to eat and use the toilet once per day. She cannot shower as frequently as she would like.
She shared: ``I live in constant fear that should something happen to my health aide, that my literal independence will be taken from me overnight. I don't know when this situation will improve, and I have no other resources to lean on should my situation worsen.''
The solution, however, is simple. We need home care jobs to be recognized and treated as quality, dignified jobs with family- sustaining wages. If we pay home care workers a living wage, these jobs will be filled immediately because of the high demand. We need to ensure our home care jobs never become minimum wage jobs again.
I want to thank her for sharing her personal experience and allowing me to share it tonight. It goes to show how connected and interdependent we all are on one another and the care economy.
We need to meet this dire moment with a substantial, transformative investment in the care economy, and we must do that with the American Families Plan.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.