Full-Year Continuing Appropriation Act, 2011
Mr. Chair, I am pleased that Mr. Akin plans to withdraw his amendment #181 to defund the bipartisan indoor lighting provision of the historic Energy Independence and Security Act, which President Bush signed into law in 2007. Let me…
Mr. Chair, I am pleased that Mr. Akin plans to withdraw his amendment #181 to defund the bipartisan indoor lighting provision of the historic Energy Independence and Security Act, which President Bush signed into law in 2007.
Let me underscore a few facts:
First, Chairman Upton plans to hold an oversight hearing on this provision in the near future--so action today would have been premature.
Second, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, which represents the domestic manufacturers of light bulbs and includes GE, Sylvania and Phillips, urges a ``no'' vote.
Third, the law does not ban incandescent light bulbs, or force Americans to buy Chinese-made compact fluorescent bulbs that contain small traces of mercury.
Fourth, what the law does is set a glide path to US manufacture of more efficient light bulbs--which are already saving consumers an average of $200 per family per year. Manufacturing facilities in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Florida and Torrance, CA--in my district--are creating thousands of new jobs right now.
Finally, when the law passed by a strong bipartisan vote my co-author Rep. Upton said: ``. . . it is a bipartisan effort in every way . . . this is where we need to be . . . where the world needs to be.''
And then-Ranking Member on Energy and Commerce Rep. Barton added: ``. . . this is one of the few areas where there has been constructive dialogue and bipartisanship . . .''
Withdrawing this amendment is the proper thing to do and I commend Rep. Akin for doing so.
