Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2433) to amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in the laws relating to the employment and training of veterans, and for other purposes, as…
Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2433) to amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements in the laws relating to the employment and training of veterans, and for other purposes, as amended.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Today I rise in strong support of H.R. 2433, as amended, the Veterans Opportunity to Work, or the VOW Act. The objective of H.R. 2433, as amended, is to use an approach that is comprehensive and is fiscally and programmatically sound to help a broad cross-section of
veterans obtain or retain meaningful employment.
Foremost among the provisions of the VOW Act is title I of the original legislation that I was proud to introduce to help put our unemployed veterans back to work. Title I targets retraining assistance to 100,000 unemployed veterans of past wars by temporarily extending their eligibility for the Montgomery GI bill. The advantage of this approach is that we are providing a reasonably robust yet affordable benefit without creating a new program. Other provisions in this bill continue the comprehensive approach by mandating, with a few exceptions, that separating servicemembers participate in transition assistance program classes.
Yet other provisions facilitate the alignment of State licensing and credentialing standards with the skills servicemembers learned during their military service to our country, and strengthening the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act provisions. The bill also incorporates a bill authored by the vice chairman of our committee, my good friend Gus Bilirakis from Florida, to direct the VA to collect data to determine the number of credit hours, the degrees, and the certificates earned by those attending courses under the GI bill.
Most importantly, the data collected will help us to learn how well the GI bill benefits are positioning veterans to get jobs in today's economy and market.
Provisions from H.R. 120, authored by the gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx), are also a part of this legislation. These provisions would extend the VA's home loan guaranty program to certain surviving spouses of chronically and severely disabled veterans. I thank Ms. Foxx for her continued advocacy on behalf of those whose support and loyalty was so important to their veteran spouses.
And finally, I should point out that the mandatory and discretionary costs of the bill before us today are fully covered and are compliant with the budget rules of this House, according to CBO. Mandatory offsets are covered by extending at their present rate funding fees paid by veterans using their home loan guaranty benefit and by limiting pension payments to veterans receiving care in Medicaid-funded nursing homes. These are both offsets that the committee has used extensively in the past, and most importantly, in passing a fix to the post-9/11 GI bill by a vote of 424-0 in this House.
The discretionary costs of the bill are covered by two additional provisions. The first eliminates the overcharging of VA by ambulance providers for transporting certain veterans. And the second holds VA employee travel, printing, and vehicle fleet costs at 2011 levels.
To my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, I say that this is in fact a good bill that addresses a major issue confronting the Nation in a comprehensive and fiscally responsible manner with the support of the veterans service organizations.
Madam Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to join me in supporting H.R. 2433, as amended, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I did not know that we were here today to hear a recitation of Dr. Seuss, but apparently we are.
What's interesting to note is that the gentleman from California has supported over and over and over again reaching into fee payments to pay for funding of other programs which he supported, like the Filipino Veterans Act, which I supported. And, in fact, I was a cosponsor of that piece of legislation. And I find that it's interesting that in 2010, Mr. Filner proposed nearly $1 billion in cuts to old age pension and aid, and attendants payments to the elderly, the poor, and the disabled wartime American veterans in an attempt to provide generous payments to noncitizen Filipino veterans of the Second World War.
With that, I would like to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Florida, the vice chair of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, Mr. Bilirakis.
Will the gentleman yield?
Since the gentleman, my good friend, forgot to yield to me during that discussion, I just want to set the record straight that H.R. 2297, on December 16, 2003, of which Mr. Filner was a cosponsor, increased--it didn't just extend--it increased fees on original and subsequent use loans, which was done to finance veterans benefits in the bill, including the burial of Philippine veterans. In the House he enthusiastically endorsed the bill reported out of committee and again endorsed a negotiated version with the Senate.
With that, I yield 2 minutes to my colleague from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx).
Will the gentleman yield?
Will my good friend yield?
I would ask my good friend, the ranking member, if he would respond to a question.
Madam Speaker, I would ask if the gentleman from California supports Senator Murray's piece of legislation--which I believe there is almost an identical piece filed in the House by Mr. Bishop--does he support, yes or no, that piece of legislation?
I yield to the gentleman from California.
Reclaiming my time, Madam Speaker, I find it quite interesting that the gentleman from California has just called the Senator, who is the chair of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, a hypocrite, which I do not believe is appropriate.
I believe that there are nuances and differences which we will be able to work out, hopefully, in conference when we bring these bills together. I hope that the minority will, in fact, engage in the conference portion of this piece of legislation because we have tried to engage them over and over outside of the committee structure to be able to give them an opportunity to give us another offset, another way to fund this particular piece of legislation, and they have not brought anything to us. So, to me, it's a problem we are trying to solve. We have different ways in which we are trying to accomplish goals.
And I want to put veterans back to work, helping to retrain those, in particular those that are unemployed in this very, very difficult economic time. The overall veterans' unemployment numbers are around 8.1 percent, and we know that the numbers with the OEF/OIF returning veterans are significantly higher.
I don't believe I have any more speakers on this particular piece of legislation, Madam Speaker, and I would reserve the balance of my time.
Will the gentleman yield?
If there are a hundred ways to perfect the piece of legislation, why have you and the minority party not offered one, not one time in our committee? And you and I have tried very diligently during the preceding months in this Congress to try to be able to keep as nonpartisan as we possibly can, but not one time have you offered anything other than rhetoric to attempt to perfect this bill. Why haven't you offered any amendments?
I do support goals.
I do support goals.
I support creating jobs.
We continue to have no more speakers and would reserve the balance of our time until such time as the minority wishes to close.
Madam Speaker, I thank my good friend from California for the lively debate.
I would remind my colleagues that this piece of legislation did pass out of our committee with bipartisan support, 17-5.
I would like to enter into the Record the following letters of support from various organizations:
Military Officers Association
of America,
Alexandria, VA, July 14, 2011.
Hon. Jeff Miller,
Chairman, Committee on Veterans Affairs, House of
Representatives, Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Miller: On behalf of the 370,000 members of
the Military Officers Association of America (MOAA), I am
writing to thank you for your leadership in introducing H.R.
2433, The Veterans Opportunity to Work Act.
H.R. 2433 would re-open Vietnam Era GI Bill educational
benefits to certain veterans who have been chronically
unemployed, mandate attendance in the Transition Assistance
Program (TAP), require the Defense and Departments of Labor
to track outcome measures for TAP participants, re-authorize
a pilot program to link military acquired skills to civilian
jobs through licensing and certification, and for other
purposes.
MOAA recommends including a provision in the bill to
require outreach by the VA to unemployed veterans who may be
eligible for the GI Bill benefits authorized in Title I of
the legislation. We would also recommend adoption of
Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VRE) program
adjustments and other employment-related features in the
Hiring Heroes Act of 2011, H.R. 1941.
MOAA pledges its full support for early enactment of H.R.
1941 and respectfully requests including this letter in the
record of any hearing to consider or mark-up this important
legislation.
Sincerely,
Norb Ryan.
I also ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on H.R. 2433, as amended.
I once again encourage all Members to support this
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.