Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the House amendment to H.R. 1586. This comprehensive bill includes two bills passed by the House, H.R. 915, the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act, and H.R. 3371, the Bipartisan…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the House amendment to H.R. 1586. This comprehensive bill includes two bills passed by the House, H.R. 915, the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act, and H.R. 3371, the Bipartisan Airline Safety and Pilot Training Improvement Act of 2009. Together, these bills are a product of over 20 hearings of our subcommittee, of the Aviation Subcommittee, many roundtable discussions on a whole host of topics in the aviation industry, and let me say that we also had the input and worked with the Federal Aviation Administration and every group and organization in the aviation community.
Mr. Speaker, the other body passed the FAA Reauthorization bill, H.R. 1586, using an unrelated House-passed tax bill, as Chairman Oberstar stated. The Senate amended H.R. 1586 and inserted the language from S. 1451, the FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act.
In response to the action taken by the Senate, today the House will be amending H.R. 1586 with language that has already been passed by the House to ensure many important provisions included in both bills, H.R. 915 and H.R. 3371, that they're maintained throughout conference with the Senate.
There are provisions that are very important that are not included in the Senate bill that were included in H.R. 915, in the legislation that the House is amending today that I want to highlight.
First, the House bill increases the cap on the passenger facility charge from $4.50 to $7 to help airports that choose to participate in the PFC program to meet capital needs. According to the FAA, if every airport currently collecting a $4 or $4.50 PFC raises its PFC to $7, that increase would generate approximately $1.3 billion in additional revenue for airport capital needs each year. This increase in the PFC will allow airports to improve and expand their facilities, while creating jobs at a time when jobs are critically needed in this country.
Second, H.R. 1586, as amended, provides consistency in collective bargaining rights throughout the express carrier industry by allowing employees working on the ground and driving trucks to organize under the National Labor Relations Act, which enables employees to organize at the local level as opposed to the national level. Workers who are directly involved with the aircraft operation portion of those companies, like pilots and mechanics, would continue to be under the jurisdiction of the Railway Labor Act.
In addition, this legislation also includes one of the strongest aviation safety bills in decades, H.R. 3371, the Airline Safety and Pilot Training Act of 2009. This bipartisan legislation was written and introduced by Chairman Oberstar, Ranking Member Mica, Mr. Petri, and myself last year. The legislation was introduced after many hearings and roundtable discussions and with the input of the families of those who perished in the Colgan accident in Buffalo, the pilot groups, airlines, the National Safety Transportation Board, and the Department of Transportation Inspector General, as well as many Members of this body.
Let me say, Mr. Speaker, that the Aviation Subcommittee also held hearings and roundtables on safety issues related to the Colgan accident, culminating in the introduction of H.R. 3371.
Regional airlines have been involved in the last seven fatal U.S. airline accidents, and pilot performance has been implicated in four of these accidents. Our bill, the action that we take today, and the action that we took in the legislation before us will strengthen pilot training requirements and qualifications.
There are five important provisions that I want to highlight very quickly that were originally included in H.R. 3371 and in the bill before us.
First, to address pilot qualification, the bill increases the minimum number of flight hours required to be hired as an airline pilot. Currently, the first officer only needs a commercial pilot's license to be a pilot, which requires a minimum of 250 flight hours. There is a consensus that 250 hours is simply not enough to be an airline pilot and that safety would be improved by raising the standard.
Under our legislation, all airline pilots must obtain an airline transport pilot license, which is currently only mandatory for an airline captain. The ATP requires a minimum of 1,500 flight hours and additional aeronautical knowledge, crew resource management training, and greater flight proficiency testing.
The legislation also strengthens the ATP qualitative minimum requirements, such as demonstrating the ability to function effectively in a multipilot environment and in training to fly in adverse weather conditions, including icing.
Second, we mandate several outstanding NTSB recommendations related to pilot training that were discussed at our hearings, such as those on stall and upset recovery and remedial training.
Third, to ensure that airlines can make informed hiring decisions, the bill requires the FAA to create and maintain an electronic pilot records database. The database will allow an airline to quickly assess an applicant's comprehensive record for hiring purposes only.
Fourth, fatigue has been on the NTSB's most wanted list since 1990. The bill directs the FAA to implement a new pilot flight and duty time rule, taking into account the operating environment of today's pilots and the scientific research on fatigue. As part of the rulemaking, the National Academy of Sciences is tasked with studying the effects of commuting on pilot fatigue. In addition, the bill requires air carriers to create fatigue risk management systems to proactively mitigate fatigue.
Finally, the bill requires all Internet Web sites that sell airline tickets to show, on the first page of the Web display, the name of the air carrier operating each flight segment of a proposed itinerary.
Although there are a few contentious issues that you heard about today, I believe that we have discussed many of these issues and that they can be resolved in conference with the Senate. Virtually the entire aviation community, the airlines, the airports, general aviation, State aviation officials have communicated to us in a unified voice the need to get a multiyear reauthorization done as soon as possible.
Mr. Speaker, the House has already passed these bills separately. Incorporated together as the Aviation Safety and Investment Act of 2010, this legislation provides important stability
for NextGen and the needed capacity improvements, while also strengthening aviation safety.
I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.
I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, let me thank Chairman Oberstar for not only all of his hard work--I think everyone in this body recognizes that no one knows more about aviation and transportation issues, not only in the Congress, but I would venture to say in this country, than the chairman of our full committee, Mr. Oberstar.
Both of these bills, both the reauthorization bill and the pilot safety bill, are very good bills. Both have gone through extensive hearings. As I said, we had over 20 safety hearings on the reauthorization bill. We had many roundtable discussions. We had the input of everyone that you can think of in the industry. We heard from all sides. No one was shut out of the process.
The airlines, the airports, the pilots, the flight attendants, the mechanics, the family members of those who perished in the Colgan tragedy, we heard from all of them. We had Captain Sullenberger in to talk to us about the pilot safety bill to seek his opinion about what needed to be done as far as increasing standards and improving safety.
So both of these bills, both the reauthorization bill and the pilot safety bill, they also--not only did we go through extensive hearings but they passed the committee overwhelmingly and passed this body overwhelmingly. There are no surprises in either one of those bills, in the FAA reauthorization bill or in the pilot training bill. All of the issues, all of the provisions that are in both of these bills have gone through extensive hearings and through extensive discussions. There were no surprises.
My friend from Florida makes reference to the bill that he passed as chairman of the Aviation Subcommittee in 2003, and I think it's worth noting that we, as chairman of the Aviation Subcommittee and Mr. Oberstar as chairman of the full committee, we started negotiations on the reauthorization bill back in 2007, in the spring of 2007. We met with our friends on the other side of the aisle. We talked about the reauthorization bill, what needed to be in it, and it was the Bush administration.
My friend from Florida knows because he told me over and over again that if we passed the bill that we were putting together, that the Bush administration would veto the bill. In addition to that, it was the Bush administration administrator of the FAA at the time, Ms. Blakey, who was the administrator of the FAA, who, in fact, we had a difficult time negotiating with her concerning some provisions in the bill, in particular, the contract problems with the air traffic controllers.
And then after she left the position and an acting administrator, Mr. Sturgell, was appointed, he, in fact, dragged negotiations out. And finally, when we got to the point where we thought we had an agreement, there was only one pending problem with the agreement, and the FAA demanded some concessions on the part of the air traffic controllers. And the air traffic controllers came into a meeting with all of us and said, if that's what it takes to get a contract and get this dispute settled, we will give it up. We will make these concessions.
And Mr. Sturgell, in that room, said, well, there are other issues. We thought we had an agreement but for one item. And when the air traffic controllers said we will make those concessions, we are all in to get this solved, it was the Bush administration that said, we have more problems and other issues that we have to discuss.
So let me just say that I am not here to point fingers. But when my friend from Florida says that the Democrats control the House and the Senate and the White House, the fact of the matter is what I just said: we were ready to go with the bill in the spring and summer of 2007, and the reason that it was held up is because we continued to try and negotiate and try and get the Bush administration and the FAA under the Bush administration to reach agreements with us and, unfortunately, it did not happen. We came to the floor, and we passed the bill in 2007 with very strong support.
Again, I would just remind Members, there are no surprises in this bill today. Every provision in the FAA reauthorization bill, every provision in the pilot safety and training bill, all of those provisions were aired out with everyone in the industry and, in fact, were discussed by the leadership of the committee and the members of the committee when these bills were marked up in committee. We had extensive discussions. There are no surprises. Nothing has been added to either one of these bills that we have before us today.
Let me conclude, Mr. Speaker, by saying, Mr. Mica says this is a job killer and in fact has read off from a list of how many jobs that each Member could potentially lose in their district. Let me tell you what the FAA says.
The FAA says that this is not a job killer, but it will create jobs. And what they say is, in the short term, the bill will immediately create good construction and technology jobs, giving local economies the jump-start they need. So the economics will improve, the economy will improve. According to the FAA, the bill will allow billions to be spent on upgrading and expanding airports throughout the country. It is expected to create 125,000 jobs annually.
That comes from the FAA. This is not a job killer. This is a job creator. It is investing in our infrastructure at our airports, it will reduce congestion, it will reduce delays. It has a consumer protection provision in these bills to protect passengers.
Let me just conclude by saying that I would hope my friend from Florida and my friends on the other side of the aisle would in fact vote in favor of this legislation. And whatever differences that we may have in the provisions that they may not like, that's why we have a conference, that's why we go to conference, to work out our differences.
So I would urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this legislation.