Mr. President, my amendment provides funds to increase educational benefits for the National Guard and Reserve members under the GI bill. Currently, National Guard and Reserve members are eligible for only $282 per month under the GI bill.…
Mr. President, my amendment provides funds to increase educational benefits for the National Guard and Reserve members under the GI bill. Currently, National Guard and Reserve members are eligible for only $282 per month under the GI bill. That is only 27 percent of the amount active-duty members can get.
In 1985, Congress set educational benefits for our Guard and Reserve members at 47 percent of the active-duty
benefit level. Since then, it has continued to slip to today's levels of 27 percent. My provision provides the funds needed to bring Guard and Reserve benefits back to that 40-percent mark.
Today, we are using our National Guard and Reserve, as Senator Graham said, more than ever. They are being deployed away from their homes and families for longer periods of time and put in harm's way. We should provide them with educational benefits that reflect the contributions they make to our national security.
I urge Members to support the Graham amendment.
Mr. President, I express my support for the budget resolution.
We have seen tough economic times take jobs from the average American. We have seen new spending in the face of terrorism and war increase the deficit. Today we respond with a budget resolution that will set the correct tone for our country.
We now see that the President's tax cuts we passed in 2001 and 2003 are jumpstarting the American economy and providing us with some positive movement in job creation. This budget will extend the tax reductions that have fueled our economy and have helped the average American worker.
Thanks to this budget resolution, we will reduce the deficit by $139 billion to a total deficit of $338 billion in 2005. Our reductions follow the President's plan to cut the deficit as a percentage of our economy in half by 2006. We will hold the line with an $814 billion cap on discretionary spending and even decrease mandatory spending by $5.7 billion.
This budget is a blueprint for America tomorrow that recognizes the realities of today. Those realities call for strong budgets for our military and for the State Department. There are real threats on the horizon that we cannot ignore. We must have the manpower, infrastructure, and intelligence network to protect all Americans from the threat of terrorism. We cannot afford to lose sight of the importance of these programs.
Of course, spending more in the budget to protect Americans means that some other worthy programs will have to face a little belt- tightening. But as we review our spending levels, we have an opportunity to allocate some new monies and focus on new priorities.
One such program is the Pell Grant program. Since 2001, Pell Grant funding has increased by 47 percent. In committee, I was able to amend the budget resolution to increase Pell Grants for students who are willing to work harder in high school. This $33 million program will allow students who participate in a ``State Scholars Program'' to receive an extra $1,000 for their college education.
We will seek out those students who work harder and strive for better college preparation from their high school education and reward them with more money for college. Motivating our young Americans to learn today will create a skilled workforce tomorrow.
Another area we have expanded is veteran's medical research. The Budget Committee unanimously agreed to my amendment to add $536 million in funding over 5 years for veteran's medical and prosthetic research. That is a 25 percent increase in fiscal year 2005 funding over this year's level.
We owe it to the men and women of the armed forces to expand these programs. And breakthroughs in medical research funded by this program will benefit all Americans, not just those in uniform.
But one of the most important provisions this budget addresses is the tax cuts we have fought so hard to enact over the last few years. We have to stop the average American from getting a tax increase next year. That is why this budget will extend several provisions that are set to expire at the end of this year, including the $1,000 per child tax credit, the 10 percent income tax bracket expansion, and marriage penalty relief.
We passed these tax cuts to help the American family. And just as America is finally getting back on track and creating new jobs, we can't throw the weight of a tax increase on the shoulders of working Americans.
This budget offers responsible spending, protects the tax cuts that have stimulated our economy, and cuts the deficit. We have taken a hard look at our priorities and how we can help the
economy. But we're getting stiff resistance from across the aisle. They have attacked these needed tax cut extensions and sensible spending policies.
But they offer no constructive criticism or alternative solutions. They just throw rocks and complain about our budget proposal. When they ran the Budget Committee, they couldn't even get a budget that could pass on the floor of the Senate.
We also hear complaints about Social Security. Where is their plan to grapple with the future of Social Security? Where were they when the Clinton budgets ``spent'' the Social Security Surplus?
As our Budget Committee chairman said this morning, this budget will treat Social Security exactly the same as past budgets. The trust fund balances are available for future benefit payments, just as they were described in the fiscal year 2000 Clinton budget, which said, ``they do not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits.'' We'll keep our Social Security money in treasury bills just as we always have and in fact, are required to do by law.
I am ready to tackle the problems Social Security will face in the next several decades. I, unlike many who just complain about the problem, have spent a lot of time thinking about Social Security, particularly during my time as chairman of the Social Security subcommittee in the House. In the past, I have even drafted and introduced an option for improving the system. Very few can say that. All can complain, but few are willing to be constructive.
I hope my colleagues can look past the partisan bias and rhetoric coming from some across the aisle. We drafted in the Budget Committee a serious proposal that addresses spending levels and our economy.
I support this budget before us today because it recognizes the realities of our world, the necessity to limit spending, and the importance of creating jobs and keeping the average American on the road to economic recovery. I urge my colleagues to support the budget resolution before us.
(At the request of Mr. Daschle, the following statement was ordered to be printed in the Record.)