Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. Madam Speaker, I couldn't agree with the gentleman more. California's Central Valley, whether it be the Sacramento Valley where Doug serves and represents or the South San Joaquin Valley…
Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Madam Speaker, I couldn't agree with the gentleman more. California's Central Valley, whether it be the Sacramento Valley where Doug serves and represents or the South San Joaquin Valley where I serve and represent is really where America finds its greatest abundance of its salad bowl, its fruit bowl, almonds, plant protein--walnuts, pistachios. California leads the world in production of all of these crops and it really centers right in the Central Valley.
Many of these water resources, whether north of Sacramento or south of Sacramento, share the same assets, the same infrastructure.
So after several years of devastating droughts in California that have really hurt farm families and communities up and down our district--through acts of nature greatly, but also through mismanagement of our water resources and lack of infrastructure in California--it has really cut the abundance that delivers nutrition and affordability to so many American working families who are suffering from high inflation, both the energy costs, the food costs--and in California particularly--their housing costs, because we are simply not responding to the needs of our people as we need to.
So in the last couple of days after a very, very wet season and immense hope on the part of our farmers that relief is on the way and they would get water allocations, many farmers--and Doug is in my district--received a letter from the Bureau of Reclamation.
The Bureau of Reclamation, in spite of historic rainfall, snowpack, and flooding throughout California, is warning irrigation districts, farmers and ranchers, that they may not get the water and should be prepared for reduced allocations and flow restrictions, which would threaten our food security.
Now these farmers are making plans today to plant rice, to plant tomatoes, to plant cotton, to plant vegetable crops. They are making decisions today as to whether they will invest more input into their almond production, their walnut production, their pistachio production based on what they think the market will bear for their crops when it is ready to harvest and sell, as well as what water they will have to see those crops through the growing year with.
Today, they are getting very, very disturbing mixed messages from the Bureau of Reclamation. So we should
review what some of the facts are that the Bureau of Reclamation needs to look at while warning these farmers that even in this water-abundant year they may not get their allocations.
The current capacity and water outlook at Shasta--Shasta Reservoir is a big reservoir in California. It has 6 million acre-feet of storage capacity. Currently it is at 2.7 million acre-feet with inflows of over 14,000 acre-feet a day coming in.
The Shasta Reservoir has more than 1 million acre-feet in storage this year as it did at this time last year.
The current snowpack in California--now, we are all waiting for the snowpack to come down and fill the reservoir, but we can model how the reservoir will fill based on the snowpack this year.
This year's snowpack accounts for one-third of California's water supply. The second snow survey from the Department of Water Resources was conducted on February 1. So we are waiting with anticipation with what the March 1 SAR snowpack report will bring, but we know from the precipitation events over the last month it is going to be substantially higher.
Nonetheless, the snowpack as of February 1 of this year was 205 percent of average up to that date. It contained over 33.7 inches of water or 205 percent, the average of water content, of what we normally have up to that date.
We know the daily snow center report of February 28 per the California Department of Water Resources shows the snow water equivalent at each of the reporting stations feeding into the Sacramento River, which supplies Lake Shasta, all of these stations are over 100 percent of normal snow water content.
Throughout California in the same report, there are 131 stations with all but four reporting a snow water equivalent percentage higher than 100 percent of normal.
At Mount Shasta, which feeds the Central Valley Project's largest reservoir, Shasta Lake, the 2023 snowfall is 202 percent higher this far into the winter with 97 inches of snowfall recorded. And as of February 27 of this year, just yesterday, Mount Shasta had received approximately 60 inches of snow in the past 3 days. That is 5 feet on top of the snowpack they already had.
Yet, California farmers' food producers, the champions of abundance, are being told to keep their powder dry, not to expect full water deliveries this year.
Now, apparently we still don't have enough water infrastructure in California, even with Shasta filling up, even with the snowpack set there to completely fill and top up our reservoirs throughout the State, even after the State failed to pump the delta and get the floodwaters taken out of the Central Valley, out of the delta and into storage south of the delta earlier this year, we are still going to be topped up and farmers cannot expect full allocations of their water this year.
We need to be building dams. We need to be building reservoirs. We don't need to be tearing them down. And what Congressman LaMalfa has presented here today is an absolute insult to every working family in America who is having trouble affording the nutrition on their dinner plate that they could better afford just a few short years ago.
This is going to be the first generation in American history--my prediction--where we will see the diverse nutrition of produce and protein taken off the American working family's dinner plate and reverting American families to more starch-based diets that go in the opposite direction of what every health nutritionist tells us we need to be doing with American food plans.
So abundance is affordability. We need a pro-human attitude towards our energy policies, towards our water policies, and towards our food policies here in America.
I hope that the bureaucrats at the Bureau of Reclamation will listen to Congressman LaMalfa today and heed his warning, because the American working family cannot take any more of this inflationary abuse of our Natural Resources.
Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. LaMalfa) for yielding. I am glad to be here today.
So it is interesting at times to understand some of the investigations and things that we need to write new laws for, or we claim we need to write new laws because one politician does this or his son does that.
We can't possibly need new laws to prosecute some of this corruption. I was prosecuted for planting wheat in a wheat field during a global food crisis.
My family purchased a property up in Tehama County, in Congressman LaMalfa's district and planted wheat where wheat had been grown many times before.
The Army Corps of Engineers thought we were doing something different. The field agent drove by and gave it a windshield test and said, hey, you are deep ripping.
You are not cultivating 4 to 7 inches deep; you are cultivating 3 to 5 feet deep. No, we are not. Come out and look at it.
Wouldn't come out, wouldn't look at it, wouldn't take our invitation. Next February, he files a cease and desist order and tells us we can't harvest our crop of wheat.
We asked for a hearing. The Army Corps of Engineers didn't have time to give us a hearing; barely had time to drive by and look at what they thought they saw out the windshield.
The Pacific Legal Foundation, a pro bono civil rights law firm for many, many property owners and clients around America, representing the Sackett and the current WOTUS cases at the Supreme Court, took up our case as a due process Fifth Amendment case. They can't tell you you can't farm your land without giving you a hearing.
Well, once that case started to progress forward, the Army Corps of Engineers went to the Department of Justice, and my family and I were prosecuted for planting wheat in a wheat field by the Department of Environment and Water of the Department of Justice under the Obama administration.
We ended up never getting a trial. We were found guilty by an Obama- appointed judge in summary judgment. Without a single day in court, we were found to have violated the Clean Water Act because our tillage implement lifted soil several inches and moved it laterally several inches while nearing a wetland; a wetland vernal pool that had been farmed many times before with the same farming systems we employed.
So America's food system is not only at risk because of water scarcity politics here in California or overregulation.
America's food system is at risk because we have regulatory agencies waiting with bated breath to prosecute any American farmer that stands up for their property rights, their right to farm, their right to produce food for American families.
It is a huge risk. Farmers all over America are making decisions to avoid these entanglements, avoid a fight, not farm, unless prices are incredibly high because it is just not worth it.
Add in the risk of water supply, add in the risk of inadequate infrastructure, add in the risk of arbitrary bureaucrats making decisions right up until the last minute that affect our ability to plan our farming even for the next year, and our food supply in America is in peril.
It is absolutely unquestionably in peril, and we see it reflected in every grocery store across America today. The food inflation is crushing working families in America.
Abundance is affordability. Until we become an abundant society and we understand the farmers, the energy producers to be the champions of abundance, and the regulators, the NGOs that would stop abundance any way they can to be the lords of scarcity, American working families are going to pay the cost at the gas pump.
They are going to pay the cost on their heating bill. They are going to pay the cost at the grocery store. They are going to suffer the housing inflation we have seen in California.
In California, a working family is spending 30 percent of their income on food and 33 percent of their income on housing.
There is nothing left for the other expenses they have in their lives, and this is all due to regulatory overload.
We are overburdened by regulations, we are overburdened by restrictions on what we do, and the American working family is paying for it every day.
So thank you, Congressman LaMalfa. Thank you for being a champion of abundance. Back in 2015, 2016, and 2017, we were having our battles.
Thank you for being here today. You are a friend of not only the farmer; you are a friend of the American working family and affordability and nutrition across the country.
Madam Speaker, the other side of affordability is opportunity, and families can't make ends meet unless they have affordable food, affordable energy, affordable housing. They can't do the best they can do without opportunity.
Until America decides to take practical steps to power our grid, we are not going to have the industrial growth, the worker productivity, the opportunity that American families deserve.
I think Congressman LaMalfa makes a very clear case that other countries are happy to take those jobs, happy to provide their citizens with opportunities that American citizens won't have.
As we look at our global food system that is based in California and throughout many States, a global food system will ship food to whoever can afford it best. In the emerging middle and upper classes in India and China, where they are running a carbon economy, where they are creating jobs, where their grid stays lit 24/7 and has plenty of room for industrial growth, is where we are seeing opportunity in work and jobs, and it is where Americans are going to see their dinner flow to.