Floor Statements

The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun) and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun) and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun) and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun) and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. President, I shouldn't need to tell anyone that the National Defense Authorization Act is one of the most important bills we consider each year. Issues may wax and wane in importance in Washington, but national security is--and must be--a perennial priority.

There is never a time when we can afford to put our national defense on the back burner or underfund our Nation's military. Unfortunately, that point seems to be lost on the Democratic leader.

It has been 5 months--5 months--since the Senate Armed Services Committee passed the fiscal year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act--5 months.

We are almost 2 months into the new fiscal year, and yet once again this week, the NDAA will not be on the floor here in the Senate.

Delays to the National Defense Authorization Act are always problematic. As I said, there is no time at which we can afford to put our national security on the back burner. But delays are especially problematic at a time when our military preparedness is lagging--and America's adversaries are flexing their muscle.

In July of this year, the bipartisan Commission on the National Defense Strategy published its final report. And I just want to read a couple of lines from that report. This is from the report summary:

The Commission finds that the U.S. military lacks both the

capabilities and the capacity required to be confident it can

deter and prevail in combat.

Let me just repeat that. Think about that for a moment.

The Commission finds that the U.S. military lacks both the

capabilities and the capacity required to be confident it can

deter and prevail in combat.

That is a pretty damning statement.

Elsewhere, the commission notes:

The Commission finds that, in many ways, China is outpacing

the United States and has largely negated the U.S. military

advantage in the Western Pacific through two decades of

focused military investment. Without significant change by

the United States, the balance of power will continue to

shift in China's favor.

``Without significant change by the United States, the balance of power will continue to shift in China's favor.''

And from the Strategic Posture Commission report in 2023:

Today the United States is on the cusp of having not one,

but two nuclear peer adversaries, each with ambitions to

change the international status quo, by force, if necessary:

a situation which the United States did not anticipate and

for which it is not prepared.

``[A] situation which the United States did not anticipate and for which it is not prepared.'' In other words, we have work to do--a lot of work to do.

And that work is being inhibited by the Democrat leader's decision not to prioritize the National Defense Authorization Act and defense spending bills.

And needless to say, while the Democrat leader delays, the world isn't getting any safer. China, which has grown increasingly aggressive in the Pacific, is investing heavily in its military--and is outpacing our military in modern capabilities like hypersonic missiles.

This past week alone, China unveiled a new stealth fighter jet, along with other advanced technologies.

Russia, meanwhile, continues its war of aggression in Ukraine--most recently with a massive missile attack

this weekend on Ukrainian infrastructure.

Meanwhile, in the Middle East, Hamas continues to hold hostages it seized in its attack on October 7 of last year, including Americans.

And Iran-backed proxies continue to menace both Israel and U.S. assets in the region. Iran has spent decades--decades--fomenting unrest in the Middle East, and the news that it intends to increase its military budget by a staggering 200 percent next year suggests the country has no plans to abandon its destabilizing activities.

I could go on. Each day's news is a reminder that we live in an increasingly dangerous world--and that while we never invite conflict, we have to be prepared for it.

The Democratic leader may have chosen to spend his time this year on show votes and Biden nominees. But next year, control of the Senate will be different. And I will tell my colleagues right now that in the 119th Congress, neither the NDAA nor military preparedness will be put on the back burner. Under Republican governance, providing for our Nation's defense and supporting our men and women in uniform will not only continue to be one of Congress's most important obligations, it will be treated as such.

I yield the floor.

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Wyoming (Mr. Barrasso), the Senator from Tennessee (Mrs. Blackburn), the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from Alabama (Mrs. Britt), the Senator from West Virginia (Mrs. Capito), the Senator from Louisiana (Mr. Cassidy), the Senator from Arkansas (Mr. Cotton), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Nebraska (Mrs. Fischer), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Louisiana (Mr. Kennedy), the Senator from Wyoming (Ms. Lummis), the Senator from Kansas (Mr. Moran), the Senator from Oklahoma (Mr. Mullin), the Senator from Alaska (Ms. Murkowski), the Senator from Kentucky (Mr. Paul), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Scott), the Senator from South Carolina (Mr. Scott), the Senator from Alaska (Mr. Sullivan), the Senator from Alabama (Mr. Tuberville), and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), and the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), and the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance), and the Senator from Mississippi (Mr. Wicker).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from Montana (Mr. Daines), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Montana (Mr. Daines), the Senator from Iowa (Ms. Ernst), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Utah (Mr. Romney), the Senator from South Dakota (Mr. Rounds), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), the Senator from Alabama (Mr. Tuberville), and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).

The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Indiana (Mr. Braun), the Senator from Louisiana (Mr. Cassidy), the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Montana (Mr. Daines), the Senator from Iowa (Ms. Ernst), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Louisiana (Mr. Kennedy), the Senator from Utah (Mr. Romney), the Senator from South Dakota (Mr. Rounds), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Rubio), the Senator from Florida (Mr. Scott), the Senator from Alaska (Mr. Sullivan), and the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Vance).