Mr. President, reserving the right to object, the status quo will not work. I cannot continue to let China win, allow waste to run rampant, or fail our warfighters. When it comes to foreign influence and the SBIR-STTR Programs, the fox is…
Mr. President, reserving the right to object, the status quo will not work. I cannot continue to let China win, allow waste to run rampant, or fail our warfighters.
When it comes to foreign influence and the SBIR-STTR Programs, the fox is in the henhouse, and my colleague wants to shut the door and check back in a year.
America's seed fund is in trouble: $5 billion of Agencies' R&D budgets is set aside each year for American startups to develop critical technology. In practice, however, too many large companies-- not truly small businesses--drain millions of taxpayer dollars by churning out white papers--white papers--instead of turning the taxpayers' investments into reality.
In the past decade, 25 companies alone in the Pentagon's SBIR Program received 18 percent of the funding. A single company received $650 million--more award dollars than the total issued to all companies in 26 States combined. Even the Pentagon's Defense Innovation Board concluded that the SBIR Program has consistent overinvestment in a small number of companies that fail to deliver scalable capabilities to warfighters, warranting direct corrective action.
In short, our warfighters are not properly benefiting from the billions of dollars being invested into SBIR mills.
Additionally, companies linked to our adversaries funnel taxpayer- funded intellectual property into communist China and beyond.
I have been crystal clear that I cannot support a 1-year clean extension of the SBIR-STTR Programs unless meaningful reforms are included to ensure every dollar serves America's interests.
In just 2023 and 2024, we know that 835 applications for SBIR-STTR funding were flagged for having foreign risks--835. Yet only 303 of those applications were denied.
Even worse, a lack of foreign due diligence standards across government has opened the door for exploitation. Some Agencies denied 100 percent of those flagged applications, while other Agencies denied less than 1 percent of those flagged applications.
When I shared my report with the Pentagon, they agreed that there are significant threats to our national security that must be addressed.
If this program is to be extended, our taxpayers deserve to know that their representatives are, at a minimum, stopping wasteful spending to unproductive firms and implementing urgent safeguards to protect technology from our adversaries. That is why my amendment to H.R. 5100 would provide a 30-day extension of the SBIR and STTR Programs with necessary reforms.
Simply, this measure would, No. 1, root out waste and prioritize our truly small businesses by establishing a reasonable lifetime limit on SBIR funding, which would affect only 0.2 percent of participants in the program and, No. 2, counter Chinese espionage by standardizing the foreign risk definition across our Federal Agencies.
It is common sense, folks. We shouldn't be serving as a subsidy for Beijing when we are unleashing the golden age of America. But that risk is real and present today, and additional taxpayer dollars cannot go out the door unless we secure this program now.
Our country cannot and should not delay these reforms any longer.
If my colleagues truly oppose even basic safeguards, then this SBIR set-aside charade should end and taxpayers' dollars should be restored to the Agency's R&D budgets, where they will better serve our warfighters and strengthen our Nation's competitiveness. Instead of recklessly extending the status quo for another year, these set-aside dollars would simply be returned to each Agency, and small businesses can continue to compete for those awards.
I believe President Trump has assembled a world-class administration that is more than ready to deploy these R&D dollars. Unburdened by additional layers of bureaucracy, Agencies can execute awards to small businesses in line with both the taxpayers' interests and our national security.
I am willing to work with you to find a commonsense solution, one that works for both sides and ultimately the American people; however, as the proposal stands, on behalf of our warfighters, our national security, and our truly small businesses, I cannot let the status quo continue.
Therefore, I ask that the consent be modified and the Ernst substitute amendment at the desk be considered and agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and passed; and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
Mr. President, reserving the right to object.
Our Nation cannot afford to extend another flawed program that fails to meet the innovation challenges of the 21st century.
With China at our heels and wasted taxpayer dollars being funneled out the door, it is clear the status quo does not work or serve our truly small businesses. The moment for action is now, but my colleague wants to shut the door on that and continue with more of the same for another year.
I will keep working to safeguard SBIR-funded technologies from our adversaries and ensure we invest in the best and brightest small businesses so America maintains our technological advantage; however, continuing the status quo is not a solution I can support.
Without my amendment, on behalf of our warfighters, our national security, and our hard-working taxpayers, I therefore object.
Mr. President, the same Washington politicians who were whining about DOGE laying off unnecessary bureaucrats just a few months ago are now exposing who is and who isn't an essential employee by forcing a government shutdown.
In the past, nonessential employees were sent home and then eventually paid for not working during a shutdown. This is an absolute waste of taxpayer dollars.
With Democrats blocking passage of the bill to keep the government open, thousands of nonessential employees could be furloughed indefinitely when funding expires tonight at midnight. Instead of paying these bureaucrats for not working, the Trump administration may eliminate many of these nonessential positions altogether.
Of course, our brave men and women in uniform will continue answering the call to duty without pay if there is a shutdown, as will other essential employees. But do you know who will still get paid? The politicians who failed to do their jobs and caused the shutdown; namely, Senator Schumer and the Democrats in Congress.
Keep in mind, the bill they are blocking would keep the government funded at Biden's budget levels--go figure--while we continue working out our differences. Senator Schumer himself stated earlier this year:
No reasonable Member on either side, Democrat or
Republican, wants a government shutdown. Both sides recognize
that a government shutdown would mean crushing delays to
veterans programs; nutrition programs for women, infants, and
children; delayed benefits for our military; and so much
more.
Senator Schumer went on to say only extremists who can't win an argument are willing to shut down the government to bully everyone else into submission, and, folks, that is exactly what is happening now. But, ironically, it is Senator Schumer who is being bullied by the extremists within his own party. These are the radical socialists demanding we defund the police and ICE and allow our streets and borders to, once again, be overcome by chaos and lawlessness.
Senator Schumer previously shut down the government for over a month in a failed attempt to stop President Trump from securing our southern border. During that time, food safety inspections were stopped, permanent damage was done to some of our national parks, scientific research was put on hold, applications for small business loans became backlogged, the low-income folks and the elderly and people with disabilities lost rental assistance and were forced to live in fear of eviction. And 300,000 Federal employees who went without a paycheck for over a month were eventually paid for doing nothing, costing taxpayers $3 billion.
Folks, no one wins when Democrats shut down our government. It is obvious the Democratic leader is shutting down the government for one simple reason: to protect his own job. But that is not even working. Just last week, the Washington newspaper POLITICO reported that, across the country, the Democratic base is rebelling against Schumer's ``rudderless leadership.''
Well, folks, that is a sentiment we all share. From the far left to the right, there is widespread disappointment with Senator Schumer's inability to perform his basic duties, like doing his part to make sure our military gets paid on time and the government stays open.
So on behalf of all Americans, for his rudderless leadership, his petty partisanship, and his silly shutdown shenanigans, the recipient of the ``Nonessential Government Employee of the Year for 2025'' is Senator Chuck Schumer.
I yield the floor.