The Sikes Act Amendments Act Of 2011
Mr. Speaker, today I reintroduce a bill to amend the Sikes Act to improve natural resources management planning for State- owned installations used for the national defense. I reintroduce this bill, with minor technical changes, at the…
Mr. Speaker, today I reintroduce a bill to amend the Sikes Act to improve natural resources management planning for State- owned installations used for the national defense. I reintroduce this bill, with minor technical changes, at the request of the Department of Defense (DOD). The amendments proposed by DOD will improve coordination between DOD, the Department of the Interior and State, Territorial and local partners for the protection of fish and wildlife resources on DOD lands and State-owned installations used for the national defense.
In the 111th Congress, as then Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife and as a member of the Committee on Armed Services, I held an oversight hearing on this legislation. During testimony, the DOD and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service highlighted the significance of codifying this language as an important step forward with an agenda of promoting responsible environmental stewardship. DOD controls nearly 25 million acres of valuable fish and wildlife habitat at approximately 400 military installations nationwide. These lands contain a wealth of plant and animal life, vital wetlands for migratory birds and habitat for nearly 300 federally listed threatened and endangered species. For 50 years, the Sikes Act has helped the commanders of these installations
balance their use of air, land and water resources for military training and testing with the need to conserve and rehabilitate these important ecosystems. In past National Defense Authorization Acts, Congress has made improvements to the Sikes Act and my bill, the Sikes Act Amendments Act of 2011, continues this progress by proposing two significant improvements to the law.
First, my bill clarifies the scope of the Sikes Act by extending its provisions to State-owned National Guard installations, including the requirement to develop and implement Integrated Natural Resources Management Plans (INRMP) that are already required for federally-owned military installations. Another provision in this bill would make several technical and clarifying changes to the U.S. Code to make it consistent with other subheadings and titles.
As the NDAA and this legislation advance through the legislative process, I will continue to work with the DOD, and my colleagues in Congress, to modify this language to make permanent the successful invasive species management pilot program on Guam, authorized into law in 2004, and appropriately expand its scope to all military installations. The Department of Defense has supported this initiative and it is an important part of the ecosystem approach of the Sikes Act.
I want to thank Chairman Buck McKeon of the House Armed Services Committee for his leadership on issues affecting management of military installations and the readiness of our military forces. I also thank Chairman Doc Hastings of the House Natural Resources Committee for his working with me to provide additional hearings and input on the effect of this legislation. I look forward to working with my colleagues in both the Natural Resources Committee and the Armed Services Committee in receiving testimony, support and views on the Sikes Act Amendments Act of 2011.