Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment. Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, Mr. Banks' amendment to prohibit our Nation's service academies from promoting diverse experiences and backgrounds as…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chair, Mr. Banks' amendment to prohibit our Nation's service academies from promoting diverse experiences and backgrounds as part of its missions policy will do nothing but weaken our military.
The Supreme Court recently recognized in its decision to leave service academies out of its ruling on affirmative action that our academies are not laboratories for ideological gerrymandering. They are institutions that are foundational to our national security.
Our service academies are responsible for providing a higher education but also for training our Nation's men and women to serve as global leaders. Many graduates will serve in the highest levels of our military and government, where success depends on maintaining an open mind, building diverse coalitions, and drawing on broad experiences. They will lead as part of a military that has never been more diverse, more capable, or more lethal. Soon, nearly half of our servicemembers will be people of color, but only a fraction serve as officers and even a smaller fraction as senior leaders.
We learned bitter and painful lessons in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam, when leaders neither understood nor looked like the formations they led.
It is 2023, not 1952. If my colleagues across the aisle knew more about the painful history of this country, perhaps last night one of them would not have referred to Black servicemembers as ``colored people.''
Let's not move our country backward. I oppose this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Kim), the ranking member
of the Military Personnel Subcommittee.
Mr. Chair, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from New Jersey.
Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Ryan), vice ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee.
Mr. Chairman, may I inquire as to the time remaining.
Mr. Chair, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, today's military leaders are unequivocal in their support of diversity and leadership. Joint Chiefs Chairman Milley considers it fundamental. Army Chief McConville calls it a crucial competitive advantage. Then-Air Force Chief CQ Brown called diversity an imperative. Marine Corps Commandant Berger said the core of America's strength lies in its diversity.
The very government assembled here today, in its amicus brief to the Supreme Court, characterized a diverse pool of academy graduates as a vital interest on which the Nation's future depends.
The American people expect and demand that our academies are given every tool and advantage to train leaders capable of fighting and winning our Nation's wars. Make no mistake, diversity is not synonymous with less qualified. We want the best. We want the brightest. We need the most diverse.
This amendment attempts to weaken a concept foundational to our current and future military supremacy, that diversity translates into capability and lethality.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.