Mr. Speaker, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment. Mr. Speaker, it is regrettable that I must rise in opposition to the measure before us. I am anguished over it for one simple reason: Veterans' lives are on the line. I have the…
Mr. Speaker, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Speaker, it is regrettable that I must rise in opposition
to the measure before us. I am anguished over it for one simple reason: Veterans' lives are on the line.
I have the greatest respect for my colleague, the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee, and I know it was a difficult road to get to this point. I also appreciate the work of our Democratic leader to try and find consensus. There are many good things in this bill, things that will benefit everyday Americans, but as ranking member of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee, this bill comes at the expense of our most vulnerable veterans and, therefore, I cannot support it.
However, I will be clear that I am not asking my colleagues to oppose the bill.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Connecticut (Ms. DeLauro), the distinguished ranking member of the Appropriations Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), the distinguished ranking member of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Bishop), the distinguished ranking member of the Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Wasserman Schultz), the distinguished ranking member of the
Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Maine (Ms. Pingree), the distinguished ranking member of the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Cartwright), the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to my colleague and friend from the State of Texas (Mr. Roy).
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I need to shine a light on an ugly truth buried deep in section 413 of this bill. What is this section all about?
When a veteran applies for benefits they have earned, they are screened to make sure that they are competent to use those benefits to not take advantage of. If a veteran is determined to be mentally incompetent, they are appointed a fiduciary, and by law, they are reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, otherwise known as the NICS list.
A determination of mental competency is typically based on very serious mental health conditions like schizophrenia and dementia, and there are various serious reasons why a person with those conditions should not be able to purchase a firearm.
It is also the case that firearms are used in 68 percent of veterans' death by suicide. Suicide is a serious problem among veterans, and since I have had the honor to be on the Veterans' Affairs Committee, I have fought to prevent the scourge of veteran suicide.
So why on Earth would this Congress cede one more important safeguard against a veteran's death? I personally cannot, and that is why I cannot support this bill.
Republicans have pushed this type of provision for over a decade. I know because I have fought every year against this provision. They have done so with misinformation and fearmongering. Democrats have successfully fought this legislation in committee, which is why Republicans did not have the courage to bring this to the floor in the light of day and to have this body consider it through the normal process through regular order.
Instead, they crammed it into this must-pass bill, enacting policy through the back door of a spending bill. They have abandoned all of their other so-called priorities because they wanted this so badly. They wanted so badly to make sure that vulnerable veterans could access more firearms.
This is wrong. Lives are on the line. Veterans' lives are on the line, and I will not agree to legislation that will cause more people's lives to be lost to gun violence.
House Democrats have been working to put people over politics, but it is clear that the Republican majority is content to put politics over veterans, including prioritizing politics over veterans' lives.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the Statement of Administration Policy on H.R. 4366 and a statement from the Giffords organization, which both speak to the harm of this provision.
Statement of Administration Policy
H.R. 4366--Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024--Rep. Granger, R-TX)
The Administration strongly urges swift passage of H.R.
4366, making appropriations for fiscal year 2024, and for
other purposes. This bipartisan legislation represents a
compromise and neither side got everything it wanted, but it
would prevent a damaging shutdown of several key agencies,
protect key priorities and make progress for the American
people.
H.R. 4366 includes important investments that advance a
range of key national priorities, building on the progress
that has been made over the past three years both in annual
appropriations and through legislation like the Inflation
Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The bill
fully funds the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants, and Children, protecting essential benefits
for millions of women and children across the Nation. The
bill also maintains rental assistance for millions of
families. and expands assistance to an additional 3,000
households. The bill also sustains critical infrastructure
programs, maintains pay raises for Federal wildland fire
fighters, and fully funds veterans' medical care. In
addition, the bill also increases funding for rural housing
assistance, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Violence
Against Women Act, and science investments at the Department
of Energy.
The Administration applauds the inclusion of other key
priorities, including the Compacts of Free Association, which
represents the bedrock of America's broader strategic
interests and engagements in the Indo-Pacific. The
Administration also appreciates the extension of several
vital health care programs, including the Special Diabetes
Program, as well as a seven-year extension of the
Undetectable Firearms Act.
While the Administration is pleased that hundreds of poison
pill provisions and extreme funding cuts were rejected, the
Administration opposes the language included in the bill that
would potentially undermine the ability of the Veterans'
Affairs Department to report a beneficiary to the National
Instant Criminal Background Check System to keep guns out of
the hands of those prohibited under Federal law from
purchasing or possessing firearms. The Administration remains
committed to exploring every possible pathway to keep guns
out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them and ensure
the safety of these individuals and their communities.
The Administration urges the Congress to send this critical
legislation to the President's desk for signature without
delay and to quickly act on the remaining funding bills as
well as the bipartisan national security supplemental.
Mr. Speaker, I will not rest until this rider is gone from any future appropriations bill, and I urge my colleagues to join me in that effort.
For now I must oppose this bill. There are a lot of good things in this bill, and I don't ask my colleagues to join me in opposing this bill. I have a great deal of respect for my good friend, the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee, Ms. DeLauro, and the significant amount of work that went into this, but I must follow my conscience because of my responsibilities to veterans.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers, and I yield myself the balance of my time for the purpose of closing.
I sadly must oppose the bill, but I do not urge my colleagues to do the same.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.