Floor Statements

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate completes its business today, it adjourn until 10 a.m., Wednesday, October 10; further, that following the prayer and pledge, the morning hour be deemed expired, the Journal of proceedings be approved to date, the time for the two leaders be reserved for their use later in the day, and morning business be closed; finally, that the Senate recess from 12:30 p.m. until 2:15 p.m. to allow for the weekly conference meetings.

Mr. President, if there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask that it stand adjourned under the previous order.

Madam President, it was 88 days ago that President Trump announced his nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to fill the current vacancy on the Supreme Court.

Judge Kavanaugh is a nominee of the very highest caliber, a brilliant legal mind and an accomplished jurist with a proven devotion to the rule of law. Today, the Senate has the opportunity to advance his nomination. Every one of us will go on record with one of the most consequential votes you ever cast in the Senate.

The stakes are always high for a Supreme Court nomination, but, colleagues, the extraordinary events of recent weeks have raised them even higher this time. When we vote later this morning, we will not only be deciding whether to elevate a stunningly well-qualified judge to our highest Court. Not anymore. Not after all this. The Senate will also be making a statement.

We will either state that partisan politics can override the presumption of innocence, or we will reaffirm that in the United States of America, everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

We will either state that facts and evidence can simply be brushed aside when politically inconvenient and signal that media bullying and mob intimidation are valid tactics for shaping the Senate and that the mob can attack and the Senate will cave, or we will stand up and say that serious, thoughtful, fact-based deliberation will still define this body.

We will either give notice that totally uncorroborated allegations are now officially enough to destroy an American's life, or we will declare that our society cannot, must not, will not set the bar so low.

Today is a pivotal day in the nomination process of this excellent judge, but it is a pivotal day for us here in the Senate as well. The ideals of justice that have served our Nation so well for so long are on full display.

So let's step back and sample a few of the choice moments that the Senate and the American people have been treated to during the disgraceful--absolutely disgraceful--spectacle of the last 2 weeks.

The very night Judge Kavanaugh was announced as the President's choice, we heard the junior Senator from Oregon declare that this nominee would ``pave the path to tyranny.'' His audience? Crowds of far-left protesters, still filling in the blanks on their picket signs. They weren't quite sure who the nominee was going to be yet.

We heard the junior Senator from New Jersey describe Judge Kavanaugh's nomination as a great moral struggle in which there are just two camps: ``You're either complicit in the evil . . . or you are fighting against it.''

More recently, we heard the junior Senator from Hawaii argue that her personal disagreement with Judge Kavanaugh's judicial philosophy meant--now, listen to this--he deserved less of a presumption of innocence when it came to allegations of misconduct. If you agree with her, you are not entitled to the presumption of innocence when it comes to allegations of misconduct. That is from a member of the Judiciary Committee? That is the definition of ``due process''? Apparently, you get due process only if you agree with her.

Even more recently, we saw the junior Senator from Rhode Island hold forth with great confidence--great confidence--offering his expert interpretations of goofy jokes in a high school yearbook from the early 1980s. That was incredibly enlightening. Innocent jokes? Beer-drinking references? Oh, no. Our colleague was quite positive there must be some other hidden or sinister meanings at play--until, of course, a number of Judge Kavanaugh's classmates set him straight earlier this week.

So stop and consider these snapshots. The absurdity. The absurdity. The indignity. This is our approach to confirming a Supreme Court Justice? This is the Senate's contribution to public discourse?

Before the ink had dried on Justice Kennedy's retirement, our Democratic colleagues made it perfectly clear what this process would be about: delay, obstruct, and resist.

Before the ink had dried on Judge Kavanaugh's nomination, colleagues across the aisle--including Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee--were racing to announce they had made up their minds and were totally opposed to his confirmation.

Mere hours after Judge Kavanaugh was nominated, my friend the Democratic leader promised--``I will oppose him with everything I've got,'' he said hours after he was nominated. It was thus abundantly clear that his No. 1 political goal was to defeat the nomination by any means necessary.

It was right there from the beginning, a clear declaration, plain as day: Nothing--nothing--could get most

Democrats to consider this nominee with an open mind. It would be delaying tactics, obstruction, and the so-called resistance until the final vote was called.

For a few weeks, their efforts played out along the lines that have sadly become somewhat ordinary around here. There were excuses for delay. Those fell flat. There were gross distortions of Judge Kavanaugh's record that were batted down by outside fact-checkers. There were all the usual phony, apocalyptic pronouncements that are shouted whenever a Republican President dares to nominate a Supreme Court Justice. It happens every time. Hostile to women. Hostile to vulnerable people. Hostile to workers. The same old tricks. The same old playbook. But here was the problem: The old plays weren't working. The distortions were being literally drowned out by the facts.

Senators received and reviewed more pages of background materials on Judge Kavanaugh's nomination than for every previous Supreme Court nomination combined. We read Judge Kavanaugh's 12-year record of judicial rulings from our Nation's second highest court--300-plus opinions. We heard sworn testimony and written accounts from hundreds of character witnesses from all stages of Judge Kavanaugh's life and career. The picture painted by these facts was nothing like the caricature--nothing like the caricature.

So it was clear that the old tactics weren't working and weren't going to get the job done. The resistance demanded more. Try something new, they said. Well, we all know what happened next. Uncorroborated allegations of the most sensitive, most serious sort were quickly sharpened into political weapons.

One such allegation, shared by Dr. Ford in confidence with the Democrat side of the Judiciary Committee, somehow mysteriously found its way into the press. Chairman Grassley immediately set out on a sober, focused search for the truth. The committee collected testimony, organized a new hearing, and most recently asked for a supplemental FBI background investigation, Judge Kavanaugh's seventh--seventh--FBI investigation.

By any fair standard, the facts--the actual facts--proved to be straightforward: no corroborating evidence. None--none--was produced to support any of the allegations leveled against Judge Kavanaugh. There was no corroborating evidence from the FBI inquiry or from anywhere else. Nothing.

Well, that wasn't enough for our Democratic colleagues, of course. The facts were not exactly the point. After all, we sort of get it by now. When the very FBI investigation for which they had been clamoring turned up no new evidence, the Democrats moved the goalposts yet again.

I believe the latest story is that the whole investigation is invalid--listen to this--because individuals who had only recently been told secondhand or thirdhand about nearly 40-year-old allegations weren't treated as essential witnesses.

Let me say that again. The latest story is that the whole investigation is invalid because individuals who had only recently been told secondhand or thirdhand about nearly 40-year-old allegations weren't treated as essential witnesses--never mind that they didn't actually witness anything. They didn't witness anything.

So let's be clear. These are not witnesses. These are people supposedly in possession of hearsay that they first heard 35 years after the supposed fact. What nonsense.

The people whom Dr. Ford claimed were witnesses have spoken with the FBI. We know that because they, through their attorneys, put out public statements saying so. What we know now is what we knew at this time a week ago: There is absolutely no corroborating evidence for these allegations--the same thing we heard a week ago. If there were, you bet we would have heard about it, but there isn't.

Notwithstanding that, the leak of Dr. Ford's letter--in violation of her privacy and against her wishes--opened the floodgates. The feeding frenzy was full-on. The weaponization of her letter by the left led to a torrent of other, equally uncorroborated allegations. They were dumped on Judge Kavanaugh and his family, and, breathlessly, the media seized on them--the more outlandish, the better.

Americans were informed that Judge Kavanaugh masterminded violent drug gangs as a young teenager, until that accuser walked her story back. We were informed that Judge Kavanaugh beat someone up on a boat in a Rhode Island harbor, until that accuser totally recanted. We heard another tall tale of physical assault, until that account was thoroughly debunked by a sitting Federal judge. Oh, and, yes, we were informed that juvenile jokes in his high school yearbook were actually sinister secret references.

Oh, the Keystone Kops were on the case, and Senate Democrats cheered them on. They read parts of this uncorroborated, unbelievable mudslide into the Senate Record. They cited them in an unofficial letter, demanding that Judge Kavanaugh's nomination be withdrawn.

Were they true? That was quite beside the point, so long as they were convenient. Every effort was made to ensure the fact-free verdict of the mob and the media would win out over the actual evidence; make sure the mob prevails. The uncorroborated mud and the partisan noise and the physical intimidation of Members in the Senate will not have the final say around here. The Senate will have the final say.

We are almost at the end of the runway. The crosswinds of anger and fear and partisanship have blown strong these past weeks. They have harmed a good man and his family. They have tarnished the dignity of this institution, but all of it can end today. The time has come to vote. The Senate stands on the threshold of a golden opportunity.

We have the opportunity to advance the nomination of an incredibly well-qualified and well-respected jurist to a post that demands such excellence. We have the opportunity to put Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, where his distinguished service will make us and our Nation proud for years to come. We have the opportunity to do even more.

Today, we can send a message to the American people that some core principles remain unfettered by the partisan passions of this moment. Facts matter. Fairness matters. The presumption of innocence is sacrosanct. The Senate has turned its back on these things before but never for long and never without deep regret.

This institution does not look back proudly on the era of Joseph McCarthy nor on any of the other times when the politics of personal destruction poisoned its judgment. No, the Senate looks back on those things with shame and with the conviction that we cannot go down that road again. We know the Senate is better than this. We know the Nation deserves better than this.

By confirming Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, this brilliant jurist will be charged with upholding the rule of law and honoring American justice. We must hold ourselves to that very same standard. We must seize the golden opportunity before us today, to confirm a Supreme Court Justice who will make us proud, and to reaffirm our own commitment to the justice that every single American deserves.

I ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum call be waived.

Mr. President, in listening to the Senator from Tennessee, I am reminded that he and I were here in those days as young staffers. I was working for the Senator from Kentucky when Margaret Chase Smith was still here. She had already made her reputation by being the first Member of the U.S. Senate to take on Joseph McCarthy and his tactics. It took the Senate a couple of years to finally develop the courage to stand up to this demagogue and the tactics he employed.

Those of us who are in the Chamber today have had a unique opportunity to listen to a great statesman from Maine once again talk about this institution and how it ought to treat matters like this and to think about how we can rise above the depths to which we have sunk during this process.

I want to thank the Senator from Maine. I have not heard a better speech in my time here, and I have been here a while. It was absolutely inspirational.

Mr. President, ``the Constitution of the United States was made not merely for a generation that then existed, but for posterity.''

Those are the words of Henry Clay, Kentucky's own. They underscore that the decision U.S. Senators will make today will echo in the history of our Nation.

The very survival of our constitutional form of government requires an expert and independent judiciary. Without fair and impartial ``courts of justice,'' as Alexander Hamilton put it in the Federalist Papers, ``all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing.''

The courts guard our rights and the Senate guards our courts. That is why today is such an important day. That is why the vote we take this afternoon--a vote to confirm a new Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States--represents one of the most consequential decisions a Senator ever makes.

The Members of this body are duty bound to ensure we confirm Justices of the Supreme Court who are men and women of the highest character and the most superlative qualifications. Fortunately, that is just the sort of nominee who stands before us today.

Twelve weeks ago, the President nominated a jurist who has been described by legal peers of all political stripes as ``a superstar'' and a ``serious scholar'' who is ``legendary for his preparation'' and possesses ``the qualifications, the temperament, and judicial philosophy to be an excellent Associate Justice.''

The President nominated a brilliant student of the law. Those who taught and knew the nominee at Yale say ``it is hard to name anyone with judicial credentials as strong as Judge Kavanaugh.'' They describe a ``true intellectual,'' ``a leading thinker,'' and a ``wonderful mentor and teacher.''

Those he has mentored--a diverse group of bright young lawyers who clerked for Judge Kavanaugh--talk about his work ethic, his ``unflinchingly honest advice,'' and his ``fundamental humility.''

For 12 weeks, the Senate has seen that this is not empty praise. We have seen the legendary preparation of a tireless judge. We have seen the patience of a committed mentor and teacher. We have seen the humility of a true intellectual who let his record speak for itself.

Each of us has seen this for ourselves. Every Senator who came into this process with an open mind has seen that very same Brett Kavanaugh firsthand.

We have seen his brilliance, his painstaking thoroughness on display in the 300-plus opinions he issued on the DC Circuit. For 12 years, Judge Kavanaugh excelled on the bench that many experts see as the second most important court in our Nation.

We have seen his geniality and kindness firsthand in our private meetings with the nominee--precisely the collegial approach that is so necessary on the Court.

We have seen his professional excellence as we reviewed more pages of documents pertaining to Judge Kavanaugh's career than for any other Supreme Court nomination in our history--pages that depict a meticulous and dedicated public servant. And, yes, we have now studied the results of seven--seven--FBI background investigations--inquiries that have produced no evidence whatsoever to corroborate any prior misconduct but rather are consistent with all we know about this nominee's sterling character.

This historically tall mountain of evidence adds up to one clear message: Judge Brett Kavanaugh is among the very best our Nation has to offer. He will make the Senate and the country proud. He will serve with distinction on our highest Court.

He unquestionably deserves confirmation and the country deserves such a Supreme Court Justice.

Now, as I have explained, the stakes are always high--always high-- where a Supreme Court confirmation is concerned, but this time--this time--the stakes are higher--a lot higher than they have been in the past.

I can't sum this up better than our friend and distinguished colleague, the senior Senator from Maine, put it in her historic remarks yesterday. This is

what the senior Senator from Maine said: ``It is when passions are most inflamed that fairness is most in jeopardy.'' She said, ``when passions are most inflamed'' is when ``fairness is most in jeopardy.''

We all know that the events of recent weeks have strained the country's comity and fanned the flames of partisan discord. But, even more critically, our very commitment to the basic principles of fairness and justice is also being tested. The basic principles of fairness and justice are being tested right here.

A vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh today is also a vote to send a clear message about what the Senate is.

This is an institution where the evidence and the facts matter. This is an institution where the evidence and the facts matter. This is a Chamber in which the politics of intimidation and personal destruction do not win the day.

This is the body whose Members themselves uphold the same commitment to American justice that we seek in the judges we examine.

A vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh today is a vote to end this brief, dark chapter in the Senate's history and to turn the page toward a brighter tomorrow.

The Chamber we are privileged to occupy is often called the world's greatest deliberative body for good reason. We are called the world's greatest deliberative body for a good reason. When the rubber meets the road, when the hour is critical, when a historic precedent needs to be set, the U.S. Senate most often finds its way to doing what is right.

Today, we can honor that history. We can vote to turn away from the darkness. We can vote to set a precedent about fairness and judgment that will define this body for the better. We can vote to confirm an excellent Supreme Court Justice who will make the Senate and the American people proud.

I yield the floor.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table, and the President be immediately notified of the Senate's action.

(Disturbance in the Visitors' Galleries.)

I suggest the absence of a quorum.

(Disturbance in the Visitors' Galleries.)

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. President, I move to proceed to legislative session.

Mr. President, I understand that the Senate has received a message from the House to accompany S. 3021.

I ask that the Chair lay before the Senate the message to accompany S. 3021.

The Presiding Officer laid before the Senate the following message from the House of Representatives:

Resolved, that the bill from Senate (S. 3021) entitled ``An

act to designate the United States courthouse located at 300

South Fourth Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the `Diana

E. Murphy United States Courthouse'.'', do pass with the

following amendments.

Motion to Concur

Mr. President, I move to concur in the House amendments.

Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk.

Mr. President, I move to concur in the House amendment with a further amendment.

I ask unanimous consent that the reading be dispensed with.

I ask for the yeas and nays on the amendment.

I have a second-degree amendment at the desk.

I ask unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

Mr. President, I move to refer the House message on S. 3021 to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, with instructions to report back forthwith.

I ask for the yeas and nays on my motion.

I have an amendment to the instructions.

I ask unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

I ask for the yeas and nays on my amendment.

Mr. President, I have a second-degree amendment at the desk.

I ask that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

I ask that the mandatory quorum call be waived.

Mr. President, I move to proceed to executive session to consider Calendar No. 640.

Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk.

Mr. President, I move to proceed to legislative session.

Mr. President, I move to proceed to executive session to consider Calendar No. 641.

Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk.

Mr. President, I move to proceed to legislative session.

I move to proceed to executive session to consider Calendar No. 866.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum calls for the cloture motions be waived.