I have an amendment at the desk. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in support of the Graves-Boswell amendment. I would like to thank the gentleman from Iowa for offering this amendment with me and for his support. Our amendment prohibits the FAA…
I have an amendment at the desk.
Mr. Chairman, I rise today in support of the Graves-Boswell amendment. I would like to thank the gentleman from Iowa for offering this amendment with me and for his support.
Our amendment prohibits the FAA from using funds in this act to terminate an existing residential through-the-fence agreement at public-use general aviation airports. It also prevents the FAA from withholding funds from the sponsor of a GA airport, solely because that sponsor enters into a residential through-the-fence agreement.
To kind of explain this, the sponsor can be the airport authority, it might be the community, it might be the municipality, it might be the county in many cases. What a residential through-the-fence agreement is is an agreement between the airport sponsor and a person who might own residential property adjacent to that airport. These agreements simply provide the property owner and their aircraft access to the airport.
It is very important to note that this amendment does not require a GA airport to enter into one of these residential agreements. If an airport or that airport authority--city, county, municipality--if they feel that such an agreement is not beneficial to the airport or they simply don't like the idea, then they don't have to enter into an agreement. It's always been that way. It's up to those communities. Those communities, the municipalities, counties, they own the airport. The Federal Government doesn't. What this amendment simply does is keep that option out there on the table.
Most recently the FAA began targeting public-use airports that have residential through-the-fence agreements. In some cases, the FAA has withheld annual Airport Improvement Program funds from GA airports solely because the airport has a residential through-the-fence agreement. Airport Improvement Program funds are those funds that are deposited into the general aviation trust fund from taxes on aviation fuel. That's where it comes from. They go to these airports to make improvements, to expand airports, whatever the case may be; but the FAA has withheld those funds simply because an airport has entered into one of these agreements.
Residential through-the-fence agreements can safely coexist with GA airports. The FAA's policy banning all of these residential agreements remains, I think, misguided and unjustified. Rather than work through these on a case-by-case basis, the FAA finds it more convenient just to prohibit them altogether.
Our amendment will prohibit the FAA from enforcing this policy just in fiscal year 2011. What I am trying to do is hopefully give us some time so we can find a more permanent, long-term solution. This amendment does not prohibit the FAA from deeming an airport to be out of compliance. If an airport violates any of the criteria that are out there, they could still hold them accountable. They simply can't do it solely because the airport has entered into a residential through-the- fence agreement.
Again, Mr. Chairman, just to try to put it in basic terms, these airports belong to the cities and the counties. They don't belong to the Federal Government, and I think it's wrong that the Federal Government would withhold funds from them simply because they entered into one of these agreements. It should be up to the city; it should be up to the community or whoever the airport authority is and not up to the Federal Government.
I rise in support of the Graves-Boswell amendment. Again, I want to thank the gentleman from Iowa for helping out with this. He has been a strong general aviation advocate for many, many years and obviously very active in this issue.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I very much appreciate the chairman's willingness to work with me on
this and to move forward. This is going to be a process that is going to take some time. We need to come up with some thoughtful consideration.
What I'm trying to do today with this amendment, though, is just prevent us from doing some irreparable damage to these airports and to these agreements in the meantime, just this year. It's just for this fiscal year, just to slow this process down and to address some of the FAA's concerns.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Chairman, I tell you what, I would rather not withdraw the amendment, but I would take just a voice vote. I would like to say if I can, I just appreciate the chairman's willingness to work with me on this, and I understand what he's saying, too, and I respect it. But thank you, Mr. Chairman, for yielding to me.