Floor Statements

Mr. Speaker, I thank Chair Cole for the dignity and respect that he shows each of his colleagues on the Rules Committee. It is a great honor to be debating this rule with him this afternoon.

I must, however, rise in opposition to the rule because we only have six legislative days left to fund the government, and we are considering only one of the eleven bills that we must pass to fully fund our Federal Government.

I completely agree with our chair that our country is a beacon of hope and that we must, indeed, fund our military in the way that they need in order to continue to provide that beacon of hope and that strength that we must communicate both to our allies and those who would do us harm.

Indeed, America is facing significant security threats from a rampaging Russia, the Chinese Communist Party, and a soon-to-be nuclear North Korea. Instead of uniting us, however, against those very real threats, extreme MAGA Republicans are putting Americans at war with each other with this divisive Defense appropriations bill.

Extreme MAGA Republicans are weakening our military readiness. In the Senate, Republicans are refusing to allow votes on flag officers, so we don't have the generals, admirals, and top military officers we need to lead our troops. Here in the House, instead of passing what should be and has historically been a bipartisan Defense appropriations bill, extreme Republicans are inserting the kitchen sink of culture war issues that we have seen too often.

Indeed, when we talk about women, this bill is another step in their march toward a national abortion ban. If this bill is enacted, a servicewoman in a State with a total abortion ban that doesn't have exceptions for rape would not be able to take leave and get help to travel to a place like New Mexico where a woman's right to receive the full access to reproductive healthcare is honored. Fourteen States have a total ban on abortion. In each of those 14 States, we will find servicewomen who are honorably serving our Nation.

In addition, this bill sets up minorities and our servicemembers who are gay, lesbian, and all individuals of the LGBTQ community to harassment.

At a moment when we know that some of our bases are under threat from climate change, this bill cuts $714 million from climate resiliency programs. I have been to our bases in the Pacific islands, and I recognize that we must have climate resilience if we don't want our bases to be under water. By giving up on preparing for climate resiliency, we are giving up a strategic military advantage that we should take advantage of.

Instead of focusing on how we can improve recruitment from our diverse communities in America when we are failing to meet our recruitment goals, this appropriation prohibits funding for diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.

We know that people of color answer the call to service at disproportionately higher rates, and those numbers are not reflected in military leadership. This bill tells my Latino and Native American communities they are not valued.

Congressman Neguse asked the Defense Subcommittee chair why he would cut funding for the chief diversity officer, a position that he had voted to create. The chair responded that it was the best way to get attention.

That is how we legislate now, to get attention?

Last week, in the Rules Committee, we tried to remedy some of these awful and unnecessary riders. Republicans voted our amendments down.

All of these divisive riders harm our military readiness and hurt our servicemembers, servicemembers who put their lives on the line to protect us. It is never enough to just thank our servicemembers for their service. We need

to provide them with the benefits, quality of life, and respect that all of them deserve.

These extreme provisions are a trend this year, however. Perhaps that is the reason we have passed only one appropriations bill under Republican leadership in the House this year.

This Defense appropriations bill is the only one that we appear to be considering today. We are not considering a short-term funding package to ensure our government doesn't shut down. We are not considering something to cover all the appropriations bills.

Today, we are considering the Defense appropriations bill, and it should be focused solely on national security. It should be about making sure our Nation has the best and brightest force. It should be about serving all the individuals who protect us.

We should be unified in making sure our servicemembers have the resources they need and the respect they deserve. Instead, this bill attacks access to reproductive healthcare for our servicewomen and their families. It devalues the minorities, the Latinos, Black Americans, Native Americans, who serve and are looking for us to help them address the racism that still exists, unfortunately.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose this rule, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, I am also thinking about last week's committee hearing and this discussion about the history of where we were with regard to the appropriations process. I think there is a very different mood this year than we had in the last cycle, and that is the fact that Democrats have never called to shut it down. That is exactly what we are hearing from Republicans on the other side of the aisle.

We never took that position. We were always trying to work it out, not shut it down. Even though we might not have passed all the bills by September 30, we were working across the aisle with our colleagues, working with the Senate on the other side, so we never had a shutdown. What we had was constant movement toward an agreement.

Indeed, the passed appropriations bills passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, both in the Senate and the House. We had hundreds of Republicans voting with the Democrats to pass the last appropriations bills.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), the ranking member of the Committee on Rules and my good friend, who I hold in high regard.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

As we just noted, the chair of the committee has once again showed both his dignity and respect to his colleagues.

I do want to point out that you are right, I did forget about that 72-hour shutdown because it was very brief, and I agree with you, it is a stupid thing to do. No, I am sorry, I think you said it is a dumb thing to do, and it is because it causes so much pain for the people back home. They expect us to do our job, and the primary thing we are supposed to do is fund our government because it is not just the really hardworking employees who keep our airplanes flying in the air, who make sure that our food is inspected so we don't get sick, it is also the teachers in our schools who receive Title I funding in New Mexico.

So many of my schools receive Title I funding. Those are the schools that have the fewest resources, so the Federal Government helps them out to make sure all our children, wherever they live, can get a good education. Those are the things that will be lost if we shut down the Federal Government.

I point out that in contrast to the 72 hours, in 1995 under Republican leadership, 21 days the government was shut down; in 2013 the government was shut down for 16 days; and then in 2018 they shut it down for 35 days. This is a refrain we hear over and over again. It happens under House Republican leadership so often as we just saw.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Salinas), a wonderful Member of our freshman class this year.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

The concern that we have with the bill with regards to a woman's right to be able to determine for herself in conversation with her own faith, her own family, and her own doctors what kind of reproductive healthcare she wants access to is the fact that this bill would prevent servicewomen and their families from taking paid leave or traveling to obtain an abortion or related services if those services are not provided where she is assigned.

Remember, servicewomen don't get to choose where they live and where they work. There have already been multiple legal opinions that using paid leave and traveling and getting assistance to get to a State where you can get medical care does not violate the Hyde amendment.

Indeed, the Hyde amendment would allow you to get that kind of care if you were raped. Well, guess what? In 14 States if you were raped, you cannot get that care. That would violate the Hyde amendment in a sense when you cannot get access to it.

Last week in the Rules Committee, Representative McCollum told the story of a woman in Texas who was told by her doctor that she would not perform a surgical procedure to remove a dead fetus because of the State's abortion ban. That servicewoman did not have the options she was entitled to.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to enter into the Record the 2023 New York Times article: ``As Abortion Laws Drive Obstetricians From Red States, Maternity Care Suffers.''

Because what has changed is that now we have 14 States that have total bans on abortion, so we must do more to honor our commitment to our servicewomen.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee).

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Virginia (Ms. McClellan).

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), our ranking member on the Rules Committee.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I think what Americans know is that for too long, Republicans have been protecting the rich and the corporations who do not pay their taxes. When we start talking about spending, we need to talk about what we are spending that money for.

Democrats are investing in rural America. They are investing in our children. They are investing in our infrastructure. What are Republicans doing? Yes, they are adding to that deficit. Republicans put $2 trillion on that credit card in tax cuts for the rich.

The leader they worship, Donald Trump, put $7.5 trillion onto that deficit. The very first bill they brought to the floor of this Congress, what did it add? $114 billion to that cut.

That is what we need to talk about, not just how they want to cut investments and important things like heating for our families who need it, our seniors, and our veterans. What are they doing? They are trying to make sure that they don't have to tax the rich and wealthy corporations. Many, as we heard last night, don't pay anything in taxes.

Yes, we do want to talk about Social Security. I am so glad the chair brought this up because, Mr. Speaker, Republicans often swear that they are not going to cut Social Security and Medicare. Last night, when we met on the continuing resolution, there is an 8 percent cut across the board for everything but defense and veterans. Their continuing resolution has a 66 percent cut to heating assistance. They have said border security is their top priority, but the very CR we are scheduled to consider cuts funding for DHS by over 8 percent.

While they claim they won't cut Social Security and Medicare, their own continuing resolution, the language in the bill itself, demonstrates that nothing is sacred to them.

I am going to offer my friends, my dear friends, a chance to show the American people that they are serious about preserving Social Security and Medicare.

I urge you all to join us in defeating the previous question. If we defeat the previous question, I will offer an amendment to the rule to provide for consideration of a resolution which plainly states that the people's House won't cut a single cent from these crucial programs that so many of my constituents, so many of your constituents, rely on.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my amendment into the Record, along with any extraneous material, immediately prior to the vote on the previous question.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. Mullin) to discuss our proposal.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I think what we need to do is look at this appropriations bill, look at where we are in our discussions about funding the government and recognize that nothing exists in a vacuum.

Last night, as we were talking about the Committee on Appropriations, we were talking about the extreme cuts that are being made, and we know that our military, when they sort of show up at our bases, they are not showing up at a base that is not connected to the rest of the places they live in.

In Clovis, New Mexico, where we have Cannon Air Force Base, and in Alamogordo, where we have an Air Force base, those communities are connected, and we need to recognize that the other bills that they are looking at are going to cut funding in a way that is going to hurt our readiness.

The Agriculture appropriations bill is a good opportunity to talk about this. The bill that they have brought forward would fund world development programs, right? Nope. That is going to get cut. It would also cut nutrition to women, infants, and children. It would cut the funding we need for our ranchers and farmers.

Indeed, the cuts that they are proposing would be $8 billion in cuts, in the Agriculture appropriations bill. This would bring the funding level for the Agriculture appropriations bill to a level not seen since 2007.

The bill would cut broadband programs by 23 percent. It would hurt something that is incredibly important to my district, which are rural electric co-ops that serve 268,403 residents. Well, those rural electric co-ops, they serve people throughout our districts, and they serve our military bases. We must fight these kinds of threats.

Mr. Speaker, in closing, we cannot talk about readiness; we cannot talk about what we need to do in this country to support our military if we don't talk about our servicemembers and what we must do to protect them and to respect them, because they are protecting us.

So when we are talking about our servicewomen, we must remember the number of servicewomen who are serving. It is about 20 percent right now, and the number of women who are serving in those 14 States which have a total ban on abortion is significant. It is 80,000 women--80,000 women, who, if something happens to them like what Representative McCollum discussed, they could die of sepsis.

For those of us who have given birth, for those of us who have had to make really difficult decisions about our health and how we are going to deal with the complications of pregnancy, we feel it viscerally, because we know that it is such a wonderful thing to give birth, but it is such a dangerous thing to be pregnant.

And what they would do to our servicewomen is deny them the ability to

go to a State like New Mexico when they want reproductive healthcare services.

Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.

Madam Speaker, I thank Mr. Takano and the chair for allowing me to speak today in support of S. 475, which Senator Heinrich and I introduced. It would designate the Veterans Affairs clinic in Gallup, New Mexico, as the Hiroshi ``Hershey'' Miyamura VA Clinic.

Corporal Hiroshi, or ``Hershey'' as those in New Mexico called him early on, was born in 1925 to Japanese immigrants in Gallup, New Mexico. Beautiful Gallup, New Mexico, is in my district and it is surrounded by beautiful

mountains, mesas, the Navajo Nation, the Zuni Pueblo, and others. It is a tremendously, achingly beautiful place, but from Gallup, he answered the call to serve not just once, but twice in his life--first in World War II and then in the Korean war.

He wanted to fight for his country in World War II but was ineligible because of his ancestry until 1945. He then served in the 442nd Infantry Regiment, a unit entirely composed of Japanese Americans because we must remember that at the time that he was answering the call to service, we were suffering in the United States a period of hatred and xenophobia toward Japanese Americans, which makes his answer to the call of service even more extraordinary and for which we are even more grateful.

In 1951, Corporal Miyamura held off enemy soldiers that threatened his machine gun squad. He faced them in hand-to-hand combat. He single- handedly held the line giving his squad time to reach safety. Corporal Miyamura would spend the next 28 months as a prisoner of war.

Corporal Miyamura was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his service, only learning of his achievement upon his release in 1953. I thank Mr. Takano for sharing those most moving words, Madam Speaker, that he spoke upon receiving that medal. He was the second to last living Korean war Medal of Honor recipient. Now, his passing in November 2022 reminds us of the sacrifices our veterans make to defend our beautiful Nation.

The Gallup community is extremely proud to have been Corporal Miyamura's home where he returned. The Veterans Affairs Clinic in Gallup provides essential care to veterans and their dependents. It is one of our rural CBOCs that provides essential care, so our veterans don't have to spend 2 to 3 hours on the road to get the care that we have promised our veterans.

I have visited that clinic. I visited with the veterans in Gallup, and they have asked me about the status of this designation. I am going to be really happy when we pass this, hopefully this week, to tell them we have done it.

We will name this clinic after him so that he can keep watch over his brothers and sisters in arms as their guardian angel. We will remember him, Gallup will miss him, a Nation will miss him, but most of all, we will continue to honor him.

Madam Speaker, I hope my colleagues will join me in honoring Corporal Miyamura and vote for Senate bill 475.

Mr. Speaker, last week, the enchanted State of New Mexico, the United States and families seeking justice everywhere lost a statesman, a former Ambassador, Governor and Congressman.

Governor Bill Richardson is survived by our former First Lady of incredible grace, Mrs. Barbara Richardson.

In 1983, Governor Richardson began his public service career as the first Representative of the newly formed 3rd Congressional district. I stand on his shoulders, and am grateful for his sage advice on how to best serve this district.

As Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus he opposed cruel immigration policies and brought attention to Latino policy priorities.

As Governor, he recognized the importance of education and economic diversity as he raised teacher salaries and increased film production.

May we honor Richardson as a tenacious champion for New Mexicans, skillful diplomat and a committed public servant.

I include in the Record Linda Lynch's story on how Richardson rescued her husband held hostage.

17 years ago, this month, I flew to Khartoum with the late

Governor Bill Richardson.

The mission was to free my husband, Paul Salopek, a

journalist, from captivity in Sudan, along with his

translator, Suleiman Moussa, and driver, Idriss Anu. Paul was

reporting a story for National Geographic magazine when they

were abducted on the western border of Sudan. On August 6,

2006, they disappeared for 10 days. When they surfaced, they

had been traded for a box of uniforms and turned over to the

Sudanese government. They were flown by helicopter deep into

Darfur, separated, imprisoned, and charged by the government

with ``espionage, passing information illegally, and

reporting false news.''

I will never forget the day Governor Richardson telephoned

me at home in Columbus, New Mexico offering help. At that

time, I, together with Paul's editors at National Geographic

and the Chicago Tribune, had scrambled to locate Paul and

were grappling with how to get them out. Over the course of

days, we worked an intricate web of contacts

and communications, 3:00 a.m. conference calls, check-ins

with the State Department and congressional members. We also

dispatched a message to the Governor that one of his

constituents had been imprisoned in Sudan. Immediately,

Governor Richardson picked up the phone and called me.

In that watershed moment, everything changed. Bill

Richardson began his unique methodical and deliberate steps

to bring Paul home. Unintimidated by despots or warlords, the

Governor saw Paul in a familiar situation that he had

adroitly handled before. Watching him in those urgent days

that culminated in our flight to Khartoum, it became clear

that he had a rare gift of intelligence, diplomacy, and

magic. He never took a single success for granted, and it was

his respect for the ``stardust''--the alignment of the

seemingly impossible--that made it all work.

It was 34 days before Paul, Suleiman, and Idriss would see

their freedom, a shorter time fortunately than many others

detained have endured, but every bit as vivid and terrifying

and dangerous.

The day we crossed into north African air space I remember

looking out over the vast sand of the Sahara while everyone

slept, the anxiety of what would transpire more palpable as

we approached Khartoum. As soon as we disembarked the

Governor was whisked away to meet with President Umar Al-

Bashir. Three hours later Governor Richardson emerged with a

``Pardon'' for Paul based on humanitarian grounds.

But Paul was not in Khartoum. He was 489 miles away. We

would have to fly there to rescue him.

After a tense and uneasy night, the next morning we boarded

a smaller aircraft and flew two hours into Darfur, a province

ripped apart by arson and genocide. There, we waited all day.

The provincial governor of Darfur was unhappy. He had not

been consulted before the president pardoned Paul. I watched

as Governor Richardson went to work again soothing the

irritation, Paul, Suleiman, and Idriss were put through a 15-

minute mock trial where their charges were read aloud. They

were admonished but ultimately released. Governor Richardson

had worked his magic again.

We returned to Khartoum at dusk with our prize of three and

left several hours later for New Mexico with Paul. Suleiman

and Idriss were reunited with their families in Chad. The

whole excursion took only 48 hours.

For all the admirable things Governor Richardson

accomplished in his distinguished lifetime of public service,

I believe it was his extraordinary diplomacy that he would

most want to be remembered for, that, and the stardust that

so often aligned for and with him.

Mr. Speaker, last week, the enchanted State of New Mexico, the United States, and families seeking justice everywhere lost a statesman, a former Ambassador, Governor, and Congressman. Governor Bill Richardson is survived by our former first lady of incredible grace, Mrs. Barbara Richardson.

In 1983, Governor Richardson began his public service career as the first Representative of the newly formed Third Congressional District of Nuevo Mexico.

My first visit to Congress was as a young attorney representing the Navajo Nation to Governor Richardson's office. I stand on the shoulders and am grateful for his sage advice on how to serve this beautiful district.

As chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, he opposed cruel immigration policies and brought attention to Latino policy priorities everywhere. As Governor, he recognized the importance of education and economic diversity as he raised teachers' salaries and increased film production.

May we honor Bill Richardson as a tenacious champion for New Mexicans, a skillful diplomat, and a committed public servant.

Mr. Speaker, I thank Dr. Burgess so much for the customary 30 minutes to discuss this bill, and I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, I rise to oppose today's rule. There are 8 legislative days left to fund the government, and under Republican leadership, what have we done? We passed 1, just 1, of the 12 appropriations bills necessary--1 of 12.

We were supposed to take up the rule for the Defense appropriations bill yesterday, but last evening, in a rushed meeting, we changed the rule to limit it to this single bill.

The only thing we have to show for an entire week in session is a bill that attacks States' rights and California's ability to decide for its own what regulations it wants under the Clean Air Act, as it is allowed to do under existing law and has been allowed to do for decades.

Do you know what? When Democrats were in the majority in the previous Congress, we didn't hear what we are hearing from Republicans. We did not hear Democrats saying we are going to shut it down. No. Democrats have always looked for solutions. We have not been calling to shut it down. We have always worked to work it out.

Over and over again, not just this week but over the summer, we have heard extreme MAGA Republicans voice their goal of a forced government shutdown. We need to remember that the times that we have faced a shutdown and suffered through a shutdown have been when Republican Speakers were in charge.

Remember 1995-1996, 2013, 2018? We needed to have Speaker Pelosi take charge so we could open our government back up. In the Rules Committee, we heard Republicans say: Let's shut it down.

Let's make clear that the ``it'' that is sometimes referred to is something that is not beneficial. That ``it'' are the people who make sure our food is safe. The ``it'' they want to shut down is the program that makes sure that our women, infants and children, seniors, and veterans have enough food on their table. The ``it'' are the people who serve and protect our country and our services. The ``it'' are the people who maintain our beautiful national parks and allow us to see America's wonders.

Americans don't want us to head to a goal of: We are shutting it down.

Why don't we work it out? As Ranking Member McGovern noted yesterday, the last time our government shut down, it was the longest in history due to inaction by then-President Trump and Republican majorities in the House and Senate. It cost Americans $11 billion, $3 billion permanently, and caused sizable suffering for our constituents.

We are talking about people having to take out loans all through our country. I have been visited over and over again. The auto dealers came to my chambers yesterday and talked about the repercussions that a shutdown has on their business.

People are going to have a hard time paying their mortgage, putting food on the table. But it doesn't have to be this way. The White House Democrats and Republicans negotiated a bipartisan agreement in the Fiscal Responsibility Act in June that set up the pathway to how we were going to fund the government with cuts, making sure that we kept the government funding level.

Now, a mere 3 months later they are backing out on their commitment. Extreme Republicans are blowing up our commitment to the American people. My rural district will suffer. It will suffer tremendously, as will all rural districts across this country. We need to remember rural America is the backbone of this country, and they are sacrificing it.

A shutdown could delay veterans and Social Security payments. With 8 legislative days to avoid a government shutdown, we have a bill totally unrelated to funding the government.

H.R. 1435, Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act, is an attack on efforts to reduce pollution and climate change.

I have noticed that the Republicans have a habit of naming their bills to do the opposite of what the bill actually does. This legislation will remove the choice that Californians have exercised as they elect their own government and as they choose to look to how do they want to make sure they exercise their right to adopt clean air standards.

For decades, the Clean Air Act has reduced harmful air pollutants leading to fewer instances of respiratory diseases, cardiovascular problems, and other health issues. That is in part due to the law's flexibility. It allows flexibility to allow choice for California and other States to adopt strict standards.

H.R. 1435 threatens our efforts to lessen air pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. It also disrupts the U.S. vehicle market and could harm our global competitiveness and the electric vehicle market.

I will say it again, however: At a time when we have a duty to fund the government, the Republican majority is instead picking on States' rights, picking on States that want to clean up their air and fight climate change.

I urge my colleagues to change course and oppose this rule. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, as I noted, the existing rule allows choice in each State. What works for California may or may not work for New Mexico or other States like New York, but that is why the Clean Air Act built in flexibility. We should allow California and those States that choose to follow their lead to continue to adopt stricter vehicle standards that work for them.

I also want to make a point that car makers make business plans several years in the future. For Congress to come in and change the setting of what is happening--because right now 75 percent of vehicles sold with low emissions are being manufactured here in America--is creating culture wars that also hurt our industry workers.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to enter into the Record the September 13, 2023, letter from the United Auto Workers titled: ``UAW Urges to Vote NO on the So-Called Preserving Choice in the Vehicle Purchases Act.''

I remind us all that we should be funding the government this week, not attacking individual States or workers.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Pelosi), our inspiring Speaker Emerita.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I truly appreciated the Speaker Emerita is leading us to think about the why and to think about the children, to think about the children and their health. We must remember that Democrats are not against consumer choices, but what we are for is consumer safety.

Should we allow consumers to choose leaded gas once again? No. Because we know what it does to our children's lungs.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record a July 25, 2023, letter from the American Lung Association opposing H.R. 1435.

Mr. Speaker, 100 million Americans live in counties with unhealthy air pollution. Our children, our elders, low- income communities, and communities of color are most at risk. The good news is, we are addressing it. The good news is, with the Chips and Science Act, we are starting to do research that will lead to even bigger and better advances in how we bring down those emissions.

With the bipartisan infrastructure law and the Inflation Reduction Act, we are building out the electric charging stations that we need so you can get across Minnesota, New Mexico, and everywhere in between if you choose to have an electric vehicle. That is going to be your choice.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from New Mexico (Ms. Stansbury), an amazing sister who believes in fighting for the clean air of our beautiful State.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 15 seconds to the gentlewoman from New Mexico.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, I think we need to constantly talk about what we are not doing here today. We are not talking about the appropriations bills that we need to fund our government. Maybe it is because the other side doesn't really want us to know, does not want the American public to know all of the awful things that are in those appropriations bills.

The 2024 funding bills that the Republicans wrote are so extreme, their own conference is having a hard time swallowing the devastation the drastic cuts will do in America. These bills are a direct attack on rural America, on families, our servicemembers, on our climate goals, and the list goes on.

What are some of the terrible provisions that we have reviewed in the Rules Committee that we are not talking about on the floor today?

One, inching toward a national abortion ban. In the Defense appropriations bill, they included a ban for servicemembers, women, and their families from taking paid leave or traveling to obtain an abortion or related healthcare services related to a woman's reproductive health.

If a woman is raped and wants an abortion and lives in a State where there are no exceptions, that servicewoman, who joined to serve our country, has no choice, if she lives in 1 of 14 States in this country.

They told our servicewomen that if they choose to serve our country, they will be deprived of the care they need. In the same bill, they cut $714 million for the Department of Defense climate change programs.

I need to tell you, we read into the Record the fact that it has been told that the Nation who has the advantage of addressing climate change and building resilience will have a military strategic advantage. Once again, they are taking away our military strategic advantage not just with that but refusing, the Republicans, to go ahead and allow our nomination for flag officers to serve. Over and over again in this bill, they are weakening our ability to serve and defend our country.

In the Agriculture appropriations bill, they returned funding to 2007 levels. Imagine what that kind of cut does to our rural communities, from slashing cuts for rural electric co-ops, like I have throughout my district, to making sure that our children go hungry. A mother cannot feed herself or her baby if she is cut back to 2007 levels, but that is what Republicans are prioritizing.

We are not really talking about these bills because we are not talking about funding the government, are we?

Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Neguse), a distinguished member of the Rules Committee, who I am sure will address some of these issues.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from Colorado.

Mr. Speaker, if we defeat the previous question, I will offer an amendment to the rule to provide for consideration of a resolution which clearly states that it is the people's House's duty to keep our promise to American workers and seniors to protect and preserve Social Security and Medicare and fight against any cuts to these vital programs.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my amendment in the Record, along with any extraneous materials, immediately prior to the vote on the previous question.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Virginia (Ms. McClellan) to discuss our proposal.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Porter).

Mr. Speaker, following up on the gentlewoman from California's comments and on the importance of looking at this industry and how it is growing, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record a January 12, 2023, article.

Mr. Speaker, I think it is important to recognize that there are health benefits from the Clean Air Act, but there are also benefits to our manufacturing sector, as well.

H.R. 1435 completely ignores the benefits of EV production. They are completely going to be undermining the importance of manufacturing in the United States, what we need in the United States. Why would we want the industry to move to other countries when we can make it here in America?

Mr. Speaker, I want to go back to the reason why so many of us have stood up today in opposition to this rule and have stood up in opposition to this rule for what it does not do. It does not address the looming crisis that the extreme Republicans and, apparently, the entire Republican Conference--because they are all moving toward that. My colleagues on the other side could meet and work with us, but no. Once again, they want to shut it down.

It is our duty to govern. Under Republican leadership, we have not seen any governing happening. We have not passed the appropriations bills that America needs to keep our government open.

Would that be acceptable in any other arena? It would not be acceptable in my State of New Mexico to allow a party to actually just shut down our government. That would be reprehensible. It should be reprehensible here, as well.

The Republicans cannot escape that this is their playbook. They do it over and over again. When they hold the gavel in this House, they shut down the government.

For what? For extreme demands that we have already discussed, demands that attack women and their ability to make choices about their own reproductive healthcare in consultation with their own faith, with their own family and those they love, and not with their Congressperson but with their doctors.

For what? Because they don't want to, and they are protecting their millionaire friends and the big corporations. They do not want to make sure that they pay their fair share of taxes, so they prefer to shut down the government, a government that serves the American people in so many different ways.

Our Democratic voices that are coming to this Chamber, that are coming to the people's House from districts as diverse and beautiful as mine, know that we must bring their voices to this table, to this House, and say to keep it open and keep offering the services that protect us, that keep us safe, that make sure that our education is broad and has help where it is needed, that our Native American communities that we serve continue to receive the healthcare and law enforcement that we need, that we make sure that our Department of Justice is doing its job--because it is--and that we do all that work so our railroads are safe and our food is safe.

We must do all that work to make sure our government is kept open.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose today's rule, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the many friends who hold him dear, we rise today to honor a beloved lifetime public servant, Governor Bill Richardson.

I first want to acknowledge his wife, Barbara Richardson, a woman of incredible grace who is leading a State, a Nation, and a world in mourning the Governor today in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

I thank Chairwoman Nanette Barragan for her leadership in organizing this moment of silence for our colleague, who like you, also served as chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

I say Governor and chair, but Bill had many other titles during his illustrious career: U.S. Congressman, House Deputy Majority Whip, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, U.S. Secretary of Energy, candidate for President, hostage negotiator, and professor.

We are all humbled by his achievements, and most importantly, by the people he helped along the way.

Guided by an unflinching sense of duty, service, and justice, Bill opened the door for countless people throughout his career. He opened the door of opportunity for Americans seeking a better future. He unlocked the jail cells of political prisoners imprisoned by the most dangerous dictators. He never hesitated to seek dialogue with those he knew had the power to release the powerless, and he opened the doors of service, inspiring Latino leaders working tirelessly to improve their communities.

I am honored to stand shoulder to shoulder with my Hispanic Caucus ``hermanos y hermanas,'' ``brothers and sisters,'' and all of the colleagues who have joined us today. We are sharing with each other in these last 2 weeks and hearing from so many of our colleagues moving and also fun stories of those who now serve in the people's House, either as Members or as staff who have come up to me and told me the stories of how they are in America today and serving in this House because of Governor Richardson.

Bill, we do not merely stand in this well of the people's House, as you did for over 14 years; we stand on your shoulders. We stand because giants like you blazed the trail for countless Latinos to serve their country in our Nation's highest offices.

From 12 members, when you served as chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, to 42 members today, including Representative Velazquez who served with you, the CHC traces our lineage back to you and others who ``caminando hicieron el camino,'' ``walking we make the road,'' who built the trail with each bold step you took forward.

Whether it is a minimum-wage worker who earned a bit more because of your work, a hostage who saw the sun again, or a young leader inspired to serve, you created hope in many of the most overlooked places and overlooked people.

Please join all of us as we bow our heads in a moment of silence honoring the legacy of former Congressman, Governor, Ambassador, and Secretary, Bill Richardson.

Governor, ``que descansa en paz,'' ``may you rest in peace,'' and God bless you.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Mr. Norvill Howell for his service to the music students of Curry County in eastern New Mexico.

Mr. Norvill Howell was born in Independence, Kansas. He graduated from Eastern New Mexico University where he majored in music and went to work for the Muleshoe Texas School System. Thereafter he was hired as the Clovis High School Band Director. His 25 year tenure as the CHS Band Director spanned 1956 to 1981 where he taught generations of Wildcats. He later became the Clovis Schools Music Program Director and served in that capacity for 15 years.

During his tenure as Clovis High School Band Director, Mr. Howell instilled an aspiration to perform at an exceptional level in his band students. Known for being ``tough but fair,'' many of his students went on to become accomplished musicians and band directors themselves. All of them attribute much of their success to the standards Mr. Howell set.

After his retirement, Mr. Howell continued his musical influence and formed the Clovis Community Band. Many former students and community members participated in it. In addition to the community band, he was also a member of a local jazz group that performed for various events throughout Eastern New Mexico and West Texas.

Under Mr. Howell's direction the CHS band received invitations to perform at the Rose Bowl Parade, the Macy's Thanksgiving Parade, and won countless marching band competitions throughout New Mexico and Texas. His influence on Clovis' School Music Programs continues today as the CHS Band is known as ``the band that sets the standard for excellence'' at band competitions.

As a tribute to Mr. Howell and his legacy with the Clovis Schools Music Programs, the CHS Band performs in front of his home at the beginning of the school year.

Excellence, discipline, outstanding performances, and representing your school with honor are all synonymous when you mention Mr. Norvill Howell's name. He described himself as, ``Just a good ole trumpet player.'' To his community and band students, he is so much more.

Mr. Speaker, I rise to celebrate the life of Duane Ryan--a veteran, a family man, a broadcaster, a visionary, an educator, and a legend in Eastern New Mexico. Today, we also remember the lives he touched with his broadcasting from his students to listeners and all of his accomplishments.

Duane Ryan was the eldest child of Donald and Evelyn Ryan. He was born in Hermosa Beach, California and raised nearby in Hawthorne. He attended El Camino Junior College and was elected student body president. He later transferred to Brigham Young University earning both a BA and Master's Degree in Speech and Dramatic Arts. Duane served in the Air Force for 2 years.

After marrying his wife, Martha Ann Christensen, in 1959, Duane taught at Snow College in the Theatre Department. Duane and his family later moved to Portales, New Mexico where he began as an assistant professor in theater and speech. He combined his technical savvy and his love of the arts to create KENW-FM. In 1967, KENW-TV began broadcasting via the cable company in Portales. Broadcast hours were Monday through Friday from early afternoon until 9 pm. Mostly airing local programming and children's programs, the station quickly became a local favorite.

In the 1970s, under the directorship of Duane Ryan, KENW began its quest to become a Public Broadcasting Station for Eastern New Mexico. With the help of federal and state sources, KENW-PBS-TV signed on the air in September of 1974.

Because of his vision, Duane Ryan knew that the age of digital television would be part of the future. Under his leadership, KENW began the transformation from analog to digital broadcasting. In 2006 KENW-TV moved from its metal building into a `state-of-the art' digital broadcast center located on the campus of Eastern New Mexico University. With digital transmitters placed in various communities throughout Eastern New Mexico, KENW expanded their coverage area to include all thirty-three counties in New Mexico, as well as coverage in West Texas, and Southern Colorado.

Duane Ryan also served at Eastern New Mexico University as the Director of Broadcasting for 55 years. He cultivated a welcoming environment for staff and students, many of whom have gone on to successful careers. Indeed, employers often seek out Eastern New Mexico University graduates with a Degree in Broadcasting because of the program's excellent standards.

Duane Ryan was elected to the New Mexico Broadcasters Association Hall of Fame in 2015. He had just retired from his distinguished career and left us much too soon thereafter.

We thank Duane's wife Martha, and his children Tamara, Michael, Marla, John, and David for sharing him with us. We'll miss him dearly.

Mr. Speaker, I really wish I could say that caring for our veterans is a bipartisan issue, something we all agree on. Instead, for the first time in years, the appropriations for military construction and VA will not be bipartisan because my colleagues across the aisle have not put veterans first. Instead, they have tacked onto their VA bill a kitchen sink of culture wars.

H.R. 4366 would trample on our veterans' freedoms, slash access to reproductive care, and slash access to gender-affirming care. It would prohibit training that helps people from different backgrounds work together that addresses the inequalities that still exist in our military. It would allow homophobia to run rampant.

This legislation makes our VA facilities less welcoming for the thousands of diverse New Mexicans who receive care there.

Every homeowner knows it is better to fix a leaking roof right away because if not, it is going to be really expensive.

Yet, this bill cuts $1.5 billion from military construction. Our military housing and health clinics are leaking, but these cuts will cost us so much more in the future. We must do more than just thank our veterans for their service. We can't just use words. We must actually back it up with resources.

When Democrats led the House, we passed the Honoring our PACT Act to expand healthcare coverage and compensate veterans exposed to toxic substances, which 174 Republicans voted against. Democrats listened to the needs of our communities and passed legislation that made an actual difference in their lives.

Now veterans have until August 9 to file a claim to receive retroactive 2023 benefits. To make sure our veterans know about these benefits, I am hosting a PACT Act townhall on August 1.

That is what it looks like to not just thank veterans but to truly care about the patriots who served our country. That is the difference that Democratic leadership makes.

Mr. Speaker, I completely agree as well that we do have an issue that we must address in terms of improving our education system, investing in our students, investing in our schools, but does this bill do this? Absolutely not.

Last night in Rules, we actually had the debate about the fact that in the Education Committee, what has come out so far is nothing that addresses reading, math, STEM.

What has come out so far is the kitchen sink of culture wars, and our families do not want culture wars in our schools. They want us to focus on learning, on making sure that our students cannot just survive but thrive.

So here we are, standing on this floor once again to debate a bill that would defund our schools and dehumanize asylum seekers and immigrants.

I remind my colleagues that one of the first asylum seekers that we know about was when a mother put her young baby into a raft, into a basket, and sent that baby down the river, and he was saved. His name was Moses.

Asylum seekers today are doing the same. They are trying to flee incredible violence and get refuge here in the United States.

Republicans stated last night that the academic success and safety of our students must always be placed first. No exceptions.

If it is no exception, then why are we not addressing gun violence which is the biggest cause of death and injury for children in school, and, sadly, also in their neighborhoods?

This bill does nothing to address gun violence even though more than 344,000 children directly experience gun violence; even though in just 6 months this year, we have already had 188 school shooting incidents with 143 victims in our schools. When will you take up saving our children in our schools by addressing gun violence?

So rather than making sure our students can thrive and stay alive in schools, this bill would defund our schools with an empty gym. That is all we are talking about; an occasionally empty gym used on the coldest winter night or hottest summer day to shelter asylum seekers who have already been processed through the system. At this point in time, they are actually around. They have a legal pathway that they are seeking.

Republicans have decided to politicize the border and immigration. They ignore the fact that apprehensions at the southern border are down by 70 percent. They are down by 70 percent because of Biden's policies.

Yes, we have a broken immigration system, but whose fault is that?

Last Congress, we passed several bipartisan immigration bills, including the American Dream and Promise Act and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act.

Did any of the Republicans pushing this bill vote for those, vote for the problem solvers? No.

I will end with this: Matthew 25:35 reminds us: ``For I was hungry and you gave me food. I was thirsty and you gave me drink. I was a stranger and you welcomed me.''

I ask my Republican colleagues to show the same humanity in this bill and vote against it.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member for yielding.

Mr. Speaker, in June, I went home to where Democrats announced $670 million of investments in broadband that will grow our middle class in New Mexico. Then, I came back to a Congress controlled by the most extreme Members of the Republican Party who want to strip women of their ability to receive reproductive healthcare.

If these extreme Republicans succeed, it will be unreasonably difficult for servicewomen assigned to bases in States that ban abortion to travel and receive reproductive healthcare.

I came back to an extreme Republican Party that wants to take the culture wars to our military instead of preparing our servicemembers to protect Americans from war.

A travel ban for pregnant servicewomen, how un-American is that?

This rule and the extreme amendments in it are simply unpatriotic. They are un-American. The Republicans are waging culture wars against patriotic women, patriotic Latinos, Blacks, Native Americans, Asians, gays, lesbians, and trans Americans who serve in our military. These patriotic men and women are willing to fight and die for our country.

I call upon my colleagues to honor the sacrifice of these diverse Americans and vote against this rule and these horrible amendments.

I call upon my colleagues to reject the culture wars and instead to celebrate. Let's celebrate the diversity that is America. Let's honor all servicemembers, all servicewomen, and their sacrifice.

Democrats are supporting our troops, and Democrats are investing in our country and investing in our military while Republicans are dividing our country with these extreme amendments.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to reject this extremism.

Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize former Navajo Nation President Ben Shelly, who passed away on Wednesday, March 22, 2023, leaving his wife Mrs. Martha Shelly, five adult children, 12 grandchildren, and three great grandchildren. The President and Mrs. Shelly were married for 57 years.

President Shelly's public service spanned numerous decades and positions. During his 16 years on the Navajo Nation Council, he rose to the esteemed position of Chairman of the Budget and Finance Committee. From 2007 to 2011, he served as Vice President of the Navajo Nation. On January 11, 2011, Shelly became the eighth President of the Navajo Nation, a position he held for four years. In fact, he was the first elected Vice President to ascend to President as well. President Shelly's service extended beyond Navajo Nation as a McKinley County Commissioner.

As President, Shelly was a steadfast supporter of self-determination and self-sufficiency for Indian Country. He and the Navajo Nation worked with Congress to secure approval of the Navajo Nation General Leasing Act to provide the Nation with leasing authority over tribal land. President Shelly also fostered economic development to bring prosperity to Navajo communities. In President Shelly's final testimony to Congress, he advocated for Gallup Indian Medical Center to become a ``trauma one'' level facility status. This would provide the highest level of care to our many tribal communities.

President Shelly was born on the Arizona-New Mexico border of Tsetah Si'ani, Lupton, Arizona. He lived most of his life in Thoreau, New Mexico, in the third congressional district. He never stopped working to support the people of the Navajo Nation. His accomplishments and legacy will live on for generations to come. May we all honor President Ben Shelly's incredible life and his deep commitment to serving the beloved communities of the Navajo Nation.

Mr. Speaker, I too rise in opposition to the rule and the underlying bills. As our ranking member pointed out, these bills do nothing to solve the problems that Americans are asking us to face.

For example, these bills will hurt the middle class. Let's take healthcare. Americans want quality healthcare that doesn't discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions and that does not discriminate against women. That is why we passed the Affordable Care Act. Today, we can proudly say that only 8 percent of Americans are uninsured. The lowest level in history.

Republicans keep trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act. In fact, H.R. 3799 is yet another strike at that good bill. This bill that they are proposing, Republicans would expand association health plans that are not required to cover maternity or prenatal care.

Republicans rejected an amendment to require this essential care for women and their babies in all health insurance plans. How can you go back to our districts and look women in the eye and say, we have passed legislation that would not cover you when you are pregnant, waiting to give birth to the children of the future.

Republicans would also pass H.R. 3564, which would increase mortgage fees for middle-income borrowers and decrease fees for the wealthy. Americans want to buy a home of their own so that they can start saving and build their own wealth. They want to be part of that middle class, and homeownership is a key part of that.

You know what? They called this bill the exact opposite of what it is. It does not protect middle-income workers. It increases fees for the middle class.

Lastly, H.R. 461. It is an opinion that contradicts Americans' basic sense of decency and humanity. Undocumented immigrants toil in the hot sun to pick the food we place on our table. They take the most dangerous jobs in our slaughterhouses and on our construction sites.

Extreme Republicans will take their labor, but they would refuse education or shelter to immigrants and their children. Is this how we honor National Immigrant Heritage Month in this Chamber?

Scripture steers us in a more noble direction. In Matthew 25:35-40, it says: ``I was hungry and you gave me food. I was thirsty and you gave me drink. I was a stranger and you welcomed me.''

We should be more welcoming to those asylum seekers and refugees that are bringing so much pain, but also contributions to the American landscape.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose this rule.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to celebrate a true artist, community leader, and mentor of young people throughout the beautiful Espanola Valley in northern New Mexico--Salvador Ruiz Esquivel. Growing up in his native Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, he never dreamed he would become an American citizen, a leader in the arts and in the greater community, nor least of all to be mentioned in the halls of Congress.

Salvador gave up his early years in dance when he came to the U.S. where he became a successful entrepreneur in the field of furniture and design. He returned to his true calling, though, when he and his life partner, former State Legislator Roger Montoya, joined together to found Moving Arts Espanola. Salvador had returned to dance when Roger asked him to teach Folklorico Dance and Visual Art in the public schools. Seeing that there were no after-school programs for the children, they co-founded Moving Arts Espanola to fill the void and serve children and families.

Moving Arts Espanola has served thousands of community members through its regular classes, after school programs, and teaching of all the arts. Numerous young graduates return to be teachers themselves-- not as volunteers, but as paid staff. They relate to the students who see the possibilities for themselves in their young mentors. Also, all attendees receive a free hot meal.

The Espanola Valley is a different place because of Moving Arts Espanola and Salvador's work. This is an area where many live below the poverty line and too many have experienced the tragedies of addiction. It's a place where grandparents often help care for extended family members. Moving Arts Espanola has helped students become more engaged in their education. School dropout rates, drug usage, and crime involvement for these young artists are measurably lower than in the broader community.

Salvador's work has changed a generation of lives, and continues to do so. In 2019, Roger was nominated as a CNN Hero, and in 2022 Salvador received the Univisionario Award for his work. Salvador's role as both executive director and shepherd of the Moving Arts Espanola vision as well as his place in the community has made him one of my Congressional District's most outstanding citizens.

When Salvador was a young boy in Mexico he learned a strong work ethic from his father. Never in search of glory or fame, Salvador has worked hard and brought others along with him through his journey. A gifted dancer in his youth, Salvador gave up his art when the obstacles seemed too great. Now he and Roger work to make sure young people do not face the same obstacles that Salvador encountered in his youth.

Salvador always mentions that the best reward is, ``Seeing the smiles on the children's faces.'' Today, we offer our gratitude to Salvador himself who is the reason for so many of those smiles and who continues to make the community a vibrant place.