Madam Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. Madam Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I rise today to urge support for my amendment to restore funding to the Missile Defense Agency to fund against short and medium-range…
Madam Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
Madam Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I rise today to urge support for my amendment to restore funding to the Missile Defense Agency to fund against short and medium-range ballistics missiles. My amendment restores $719 million in funding to the Missile Defense Agency, to return the President's budget request to $9.3 billion. My amendment directs that this $719 million be specifically targeted toward the Theater High Altitude Area Defense System and the AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense Systems and the test and targets necessary to test those systems.
I agree with the Democrats, Madam Chairman, which is pretty unusual. I agree with the Democrats that we need to be concerned about the threat of short and medium-range ballistic missiles to our forward- deployed troops on the Korean peninsula, North Japan, and throughout southwest Asia. Today, these forces are at risk of attack by thousands of lethal ballistic missiles that may carry conventional, chemical, or, in some cases, nuclear warheads. Our close allies, South Korea, Japan, Israel, and Turkey are held at risk by these missiles as well.
Deployed Patriot batteries provide some limited point defense to shield some, but not all, of our key command and control centers. We can improve upon this very limited defense and offer a larger umbrella of protection against ballistic missiles to our forces with area defense. Both the land-based Theater High Altitude Area Defense system, or THAAD, as well as the sea-based AEGIS Ballistic Missile system, offer significant area missile defense capabilities to our theater commanders.
I want to applaud the entire House Armed Services Committee for increasing funding for both of these programs. Unfortunately, I fear these increases do not do enough for our theater commanders, who cannot get these systems deployed fast enough because they simply are not yet available to apportion. The House Armed Services Committee has received testimony from Admiral Keating, Commander of U.S. Pacific Command, and General Bell, Commander of U.S. Forces in Korea, to this effect.
The administration should accelerate production of THAAD fire units and interceptors, as well as the AEGIS 3 standard missile 3 interceptors to adequately source the combatant commands with area defense against short and medium-range or theater class ballistic missiles.
The committee has authorized $75 million above the President's budget for each of these programs, but I am concerned that this increase will not deliver capability to the warfighter soon enough in the most expeditious manner. The short and medium-range ballistic missile threat exists today, and we can procure more interceptors to defend our troops in harm's way.
Mr. Chairman, very simply, probably one of our best hedges against proliferation of nuclear arms today in the world is missile defense, and it is very important that we do everything we can to be prepared for any eventuality. So I offer this amendment and urge the support of my colleagues.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I now yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Texas (Mr. Sessions).
Mr. Chairman, this bill being labeled the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act, named after the distinguished ranking member of our committee, who has been the former chairman for a long period of time, he has been here for 26 years, he should have been chairman for that time, I now yield to the gentleman from California, it is my honor, perhaps for the last time, to yield to him for 1 minute.
Mr. Chairman, I request the time remaining.
Mr. Chairman, I now yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
Mr. Chairman, the $75 million increase to the Aegis BMD that the Democrats have spoken of here does not even fund the necessary upgrades to the Aegis weapons systems BMD signal processing capability necessary to keep pace with the evolving short-range and medium-range ballistic missile threat. So we are definitely not doing enough there.
This $75 million increase to the Aegis ballistic missile defense budget that they speak of does not even cover the expenses incurred by the Missile Defense Agency to conduct a shootdown of the U.S. 193 satellite. This cost the agency approximately $100 million.
My Democrat friends have often stated that far-term systems are much less important than near-term systems. So I believe it is reasonable to assume that the RTD&E accounts are the appropriate offset for such an amendment.
The bottom line is this: A $9.3 billion request budget from the President has been decreased by $719 million. And in an age of missiles, as the ranking member mentioned, this is not a time to cut our missile defense capability. Missile defense is not only the last line of defense against an incoming missile, perhaps with a nuclear warhead representing the most dangerous weapon in the history of humanity, it is the first line of defense against proliferation. And, Mr. Chairman, proliferation I believe, given the examples that Mr. Lamborn mentioned of Iran and others, represents the greatest threat to human peace in the world today.
Missile defense is an opportunity for us to devalue those programs in the hands of such enemies, and perhaps help this generation and others to walk a little bit longer in the sunlight of freedom.
With that, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, this bill emphasizes the need to counter short- and medium-ranged missiles in five different places. The committee report highlights that the warfighters themselves have suggested and asked for increased inventory, and we shouldn't be second-guessing them in a time such as we live.
Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.