To amend the Federal Law Enforcement Pay Reform Act of 1990 to adjust the percentage differentials payable to Federal law enforcement officers in certain high-cost areas, and for other purposes.
What it does: Adds SEC. 1068. FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PAY on page 280, line 22
Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-CT)What it changes
1 change to S. 2400
The Congressional Record cuts off the end of this amendment, so some changes may be missing.
Adds SEC. 1068. FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PAY on page 280, line 22
Adds a sectionPrinted pageInserted: SEC. 1068. FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PAY.
Inserted: (a) Adjusted Differentials.--
Inserted: (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 404(b) of the Federal Law Enforcement Pay Reform Act of 1990 (5 U.S.C. 5305 note) is amended by striking the matter after "follows:" and inserting the following:
Inserted: "Area Differential Atlanta Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............16.82% Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT-RI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...............................24.42% Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................25.68% Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................21.47% Cleveland Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area..........17.83% Columbus Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...........16.90% Dallas Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.............18.51% Dayton Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.............15.97% Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................22.78% Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................25.61% Hartford, CT Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.......24.47% Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................30.39% Huntsville Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.........13.29% Indianapolis Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.......13.38% Kansas City Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........14.11% Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................27.25% Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................21.75% Milwaukee Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area..........17.45% Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................20.27% New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...............................27.11% Orlando, FL Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........14.22% Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...............................21.03% Pittsburgh Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.........14.89%
Original wording
On page 280, after line 22, insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 3310. Mr. DODD submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 2400, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2005 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Services, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
On page 280, after line 22, insert the following:
SEC. 1068. FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PAY.
(a) Adjusted Differentials.--
(1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 404(b) of the Federal Law Enforcement Pay Reform Act of 1990 (5 U.S.C. 5305 note) is amended by striking the matter after “follows:” and inserting the following:
“Area Differential
Atlanta Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............16.82%
Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT-RI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...............................24.42%
Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................25.68%
Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................21.47%
Cleveland Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area..........17.83%
Columbus Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...........16.90%
Dallas Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.............18.51%
Dayton Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.............15.97%
Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................22.78%
Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................25.61%
Hartford, CT Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.......24.47%
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................30.39%
Huntsville Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.........13.29%
Indianapolis Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.......13.38%
Kansas City Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........14.11%
Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area............................................27.25%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................21.75%
Milwaukee Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area..........17.45%
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........................................................20.27%
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...............................27.11%
Orlando, FL Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area........14.22%
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area...............................21.03%
Pittsburgh Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area.........14.89%
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S7204)
June 23, 2004
View full timeline
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S7204)
June 23, 2004
Proposed amendment SA 3310 withdrawn in Senate.
June 23, 2004
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 3310 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Dodd.(consideration: CR S7152-7160)
June 22, 2004
Amendment SA 3310 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Dodd. (consideration: CR S7152-7160) To amend the Federal Law Enforcement Pay Reform Act of 1990 to adjust the percentage differentials payable to Federal law enforcement officers in certain high-cost areas, and for other purposes.
June 22, 2004
Senate amendment submitted
June 7, 2004