To express the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any Social Security plan that requires deep benefit cuts or a massive increase in debt.
Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL)Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
March 15, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
March 15, 2005
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 145 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 50. Record Vote Number: 49.
March 15, 2005
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 145 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 50. Record Vote Number: 49.
March 15, 2005
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 145 proposed by Senator Nelson FL.
March 15, 2005
Amendment SA 145 proposed by Senator Nelson FL. (consideration: CR S2676-2678, S2693; text: CR S2676) To express the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any Social Security plan that requires deep benefit cuts or a massive increase in debt.
March 15, 2005
Amendment SA 145 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 50. Record Vote Number: 49.
March 15, 2005
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 145. Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) proposed an amendment to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 18, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2006 and including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2005 and 2007 through 2010; as follows: On page 65, after line 25, insert the following: SEC. . SENSE OF THE SENATE IN SUPPORT OF SOCIAL SECURITY. It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any Social Security plan that requires deep benefit cuts or a massive increase in debt, and a failure to act by 2042 would result in deep benefit cuts; therefore Congress should take action to address Social Security solvency. ______