To require that any limitation, directive, or earmarking contained in either the House of Representatives or Senate report accompanying this bill be included in the conference report or joint statement accompanying the bill in order to be considered as having been approved by both Houses of Congress.
What it does: Adds Sec. __. Any limitation, directive, or earmarking contained in either the House of Representatives or Senate report accompanying H.R. 2863 shall also be included in the conference report or joint statement accompanying H.R. 2863 in order to be considered as having been approved by both Houses of Congress wherever appropriate
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)Adds Sec. __. Any limitation, directive, or earmarking contained in either the House of Representatives or Senate report accompanying H.R. 2863 shall also be included in the conference report or joint statement accompanying H.R. 2863 in order to be considered as having been approved by both Houses of Congress wherever appropriate
Adds a sectionInserted: Sec. __. Any limitation, directive, or earmarking contained in either the House of Representatives or Senate report accompanying H.R. 2863 shall also be included in the conference report or joint statement accompanying H.R. 2863 in order to be considered as having been approved by both Houses of Congress.
The amendment doesn't say where this goes; the clerk decides.
Original wording
At the appropriate place, insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
At the appropriate place, insert the following:
Sec. __. Any limitation, directive, or earmarking contained in either the House of Representatives or Senate report accompanying H.R. 2863 shall also be included in the conference report or joint statement accompanying H.R. 2863 in order to be considered as having been approved by both Houses of Congress.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1948 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Coburn.(consideration: CR S11108-11109; text: CR S11109)
October 5, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1948 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Coburn.(consideration: CR S11108-11109; text: CR S11109)
October 5, 2005
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 1948 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
October 5, 2005
Amendment SA 1948 proposed by Senator Stevens for Senator Coburn. (consideration: CR S11108-11109; text: CR S11109) To require that any limitation, directive, or earmarking contained in either the House of Representatives or Senate report accompanying this bill be included in the conference report or joint statement accompanying the bill in order to be considered as having been approved by both Houses of Congress.
October 5, 2005
Amendment SA 1948 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
October 5, 2005
Senate amendment submitted
October 3, 2005