S.Amdt. 2072Senate109th Congress (2005-2007)

To require the use of a sliding scale match ratio for certain transportation projects in the State of Idaho.

What it does: Adds Sec. __. Subsection (a) of section 1964 of Public Law 109-59 is amended by inserting "Idaho, Washington," after "Oregon," on page 276, line 24
Submitted October 18, 2005

What it changes

1 change to H.R. 3058

Adds a section
  1. Adds Sec. __. Subsection (a) of section 1964 of Public Law 109-59 is amended by inserting "Idaho, Washington," after "Oregon," on page 276, line 24

    Adds a sectionPrinted page

    Inserted: Sec. __. Subsection (a) of section 1964 of Public Law 109-59 is amended by inserting "Idaho, Washington," after "Oregon,".

    Original wording

    On page 276, after line 24, insert the following:

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

On page 276, after line 24, insert the following:

Sec. __. Subsection (a) of section 1964 of Public Law 109-59 is amended by inserting “Idaho, Washington,” after “Oregon,”.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

4 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 2072 as modified agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

October 19, 2005

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 2072 as modified agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

October 19, 2005

Floor

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2072 proposed by Senator Bond for Senator Craig.

October 19, 2005

Floor

Amendment SA 2072 proposed by Senator Bond for Senator Craig. (consideration: CR S11551) To require the use of a sliding scale match ratio for certain transportation projects in the State of Idaho.

October 19, 2005

Floor

Amendment SA 2072 as modified agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote. (text as modified: CR S11551)

October 19, 2005

Floor

Senate amendment submitted

October 18, 2005