To require a report on the Department of Defense response to the findings and recommendations of the Defense Science Board Task Force on High Performance Microchip Supply.
What it does: Adds SEC. 1044. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESPONSE TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY at the end of subtitle D of title XWhat it changes
1 change to S. 1042 · shown in the bill's text
Adds SEC. 1044. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESPONSE TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY at the end of subtitle D of title X
Adds a sectionIn S. 1042 · Placed on Calendar Senate
(8) Recommendations by the Comptroller General for addressing any shortfalls or areas of potential improvement identified in the review for purposes of the report.
Inserted: SEC. 1044. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESPONSE TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY.
Inserted: (a) Report Required.--Not later than March 15, 2006, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the recommendations of the Defense Science Board Task Force on High Performance Microchip Supply.
Inserted: (b) Contents.--The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
Inserted: (1) An analysis of each finding of the Task Force.
Inserted: (2) A detailed description of the response of the Department of Defense to each recommendation of the Task Force, including--
Inserted: (A) for each recommendation that is being implemented or that the Secretary plans to implement--
Inserted: (i) a summary of actions that have been taken to implement the recommendation; and
Inserted: (ii) a schedule, with specific milestones, for completing the implementation of the recommendation; and
Inserted: (B) For each recommendation that the Secretary does not plan to implement--
Inserted: (i) the reasons for the decision not to implement the recommendation; and
Inserted: (ii) a summary of alternative actions the Secretary plans to take to address the purposes underlying the recommendation.
Inserted: (3) A summary of any additional actions the Secretary plan to take to address concerns raised by the Task Force.
Show 1 more inserted paragraphShow less
Inserted: (c) Consultation.--To the extent practicable, the Secretary may consult with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, institutions of higher education and other academic organizations, and industry in the development of the report required by subsection (a).
Original wording
At the end of subtitle D of title X, add the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 2446. Mr. WARNER (for Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Cornyn)) proposed an amendment to the bill S. 1042, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes; as follows:
At the end of subtitle D of title X, add the following:
SEC. 1044. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESPONSE TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY.
(a) Report Required.--Not later than March 15, 2006, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the recommendations of the Defense Science Board Task Force on High Performance Microchip Supply.
(b) Contents.--The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An analysis of each finding of the Task Force.
(2) A detailed description of the response of the Department of Defense to each recommendation of the Task Force, including--
(A) for each recommendation that is being implemented or that the Secretary plans to implement--
(i) a summary of actions that have been taken to implement the recommendation; and
(ii) a schedule, with specific milestones, for completing the implementation of the recommendation; and
(B) For each recommendation that the Secretary does not plan to implement--
(i) the reasons for the decision not to implement the recommendation; and
(ii) a summary of alternative actions the Secretary plans to take to address the purposes underlying the recommendation.
(3) A summary of any additional actions the Secretary plan to take to address concerns raised by the Task Force.
(c) Consultation.--To the extent practicable, the Secretary may consult with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, institutions of higher education and other academic organizations, and industry in the development of the report required by subsection (a).
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
November 8, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
November 8, 2005
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2446 proposed by Senator Warner for Senator Lieberman.
November 8, 2005
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 2446 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
November 8, 2005
Amendment SA 2446 proposed by Senator Warner for Senator Lieberman. (consideration: CR S12497-12513; text: CR S12505) To require a report on the Department of Defense response to the findings and recommendations of the Defense Science Board Task Force on High Performance Microchip Supply.
November 8, 2005
Amendment SA 2446 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
November 8, 2005