S.Amdt. 2887Senate109th Congress (2005-2007)2nd degree

S.Amdt. 2887

What it does: Rewrites page 302, line 9 through page 304, line 17
Submitted February 14, 2006

What it changes

1 change to S.Amdt. 2746

Replaces text
  1. Rewrites page 302, line 9 through page 304, line 17

    Replaces

    Removes page 302, line 9 through page 304, line 17.

    Inserted: (aa) provides to the trust a copy of a binding election submitted to Administrator waiving the right to secure compensation under section 106(f)(2) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006, unless the claimant is permitted under section 106(f)(2)(B) of such Act to seek a judgment or order for monetary damages from a Federal or State court;

    Inserted: (bb) meets the requirements for compensation under the distribution plan for the trust as of the date of enactment of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006;

    Inserted: (cc) for any condition satisfies the medical criteria under the distribution plan for the trust that is most nearly equivalent to the medical criteria described in paragraph (2), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), or (9) of section 121(d) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006, except that, notwithstanding any provision of the distribution plan of the trust to the contrary, the trust shall not accept the results of a DLCO test (as such test is defined in section 121(a) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006) for the purpose of demonstrating respiratory impairment; and

    Inserted: (dd) for any of the cancers listed in section 121(d)(6) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006 does not seek, and the trust does not pay, any compensation until such time as the Institute of Medicine finds that there is a causal relationship between asbestos exposure and such cancer, in which case such claims may be paid if such claims otherwise qualify for compensation under the distribution plan of the trust as of the date of enactment of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006.

    Original wording

    On page 302, strike line 9 and all that follows through page 304, line 17, and insert the following:

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

SA 2887. Mr. SPECTER submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2746 proposed by Mr. Frist (for Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Leahy)) to the bill S. 852, to create a fair and efficient system to resolve claims of victims for bodily injury caused by asbestos exposure, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

On page 302, strike line 9 and all that follows through page 304, line 17, and insert the following:

“(aa) provides to the trust a copy of a binding election submitted to Administrator waiving the right to secure compensation under section 106(f)(2) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006, unless the claimant is permitted under section 106(f)(2)(B) of such Act to seek a judgment or order for monetary damages from a Federal or State court;

“(bb) meets the requirements for compensation under the distribution plan for the trust as of the date of enactment of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006;

“(cc) for any condition satisfies the medical criteria under the distribution plan for the trust that is most nearly equivalent to the medical criteria described in paragraph (2), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), or (9) of section 121(d) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006, except that, notwithstanding any provision of the distribution plan of the trust to the contrary, the trust shall not accept the results of a DLCO test (as such test is defined in section 121(a) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006) for the purpose of demonstrating respiratory impairment; and

“(dd) for any of the cancers listed in section 121(d)(6) of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006 does not seek, and the trust does not pay, any compensation until such time as the Institute of Medicine finds that there is a causal relationship between asbestos exposure and such cancer, in which case such claims may be paid if such claims otherwise qualify for compensation under the distribution plan of the trust as of the date of enactment of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2006.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment submitted

February 14, 2006