To clarify funding for judicial security enhancements.
What it does: Inserts “for increased judicial security outside of courthouse facilities, including priority cons…” after “$11,935,000,”
Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-AL)What it changes
1 change to H.R. 1268 · shown in the bill's text
Inserts “for increased judicial security outside of courthouse facilities, including priority cons…” after “$11,935,000,”
In H.R. 1268 · Reported to Senate
salaries and expenses
For an additional amount for "Salaries and Expenses", $11,935,000, [inserted: for increased judicial security outside of courthouse facilities, including priority consideration of home intrusion detection systems in the homes of federal judges, ]to remain available until September 30, 2006: Provided, That the amount provided under this heading is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 402 of the conference report to accompany S. Con. Res. 95 (108th Congress).
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Original wording
On page 184, line 16, after “$11,935,000,”, insert “for increased judicial security outside of courthouse facilities, including priority consideration of home intrusion detection systems in the homes of federal judges,”.
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 560. Mr. COCHRAN (for Mr. Shelby (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Obama)) proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 1268, making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, to establish and rapidly implement regulations for State driver's license and identification document security standards, to prevent terrorists from abusing the asylum laws of the United States, to unify terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and removal, to ensure expeditious construction of the San Diego border fence, and for other purposes; as follows:
On page 184, line 16, after “$11,935,000,”, insert “for increased judicial security outside of courthouse facilities, including priority consideration of home intrusion detection systems in the homes of federal judges,”.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
April 19, 2005
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
April 19, 2005
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 560 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
April 19, 2005
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 560 proposed by Senator Cochran for Senator Shelby.
April 19, 2005
Amendment SA 560 proposed by Senator Cochran for Senator Shelby. (consideration: CR S3892; text: CR S3892) To clarify funding for judicial security enhancements.
April 19, 2005
Amendment SA 560 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
April 19, 2005