S.Amdt. 924Senate109th Congress (2005-2007)

S.Amdt. 924

What it does: Rewrites page 200, lines 8–21
Submitted June 22, 2005

What it changes

1 change to H.R. 6

Replaces text

We couldn't read part of this amendment. That part is shown as written below.

  1. Rewrites page 200, lines 8–21

    ReplacesPrinted page

    Removes page 200, lines 8–21 of the printed bill. See that page

    Inserted: (ii) will protect Indian land and tribal fishery resources for which the Secretary has a legal responsibility; and

    Inserted: (B) that the proposed alternative condition will--

    Inserted: (i) cost significantly less to implement; or

    Inserted: (ii) result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production, as compared to the condition initially determined to be necessary by the Secretary.

    Original wording

    On page 200, strike lines 8 through 21 and insert the following:

Shown as written

the Secretary determines, based on substantial evidence provided by the license applicant, any other party to the proceeding, or otherwise available to the Secretary--(A) that the alternative condition--(i) provides for the adequate protection and use of the reservation;

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

SA 924. Mr. INOUYE submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 6, to ensure jobs for our future with secure, affordable, and reliable energy; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

On page 200, strike lines 8 through 21 and insert the following: the Secretary determines, based on substantial evidence provided by the license applicant, any other party to the proceeding, or otherwise available to the Secretary--

(A) that the alternative condition--

(i) provides for the adequate protection and use of the reservation;

(ii) will protect Indian land and tribal fishery resources for which the Secretary has a legal responsibility; and

(B) that the proposed alternative condition will--

(i) cost significantly less to implement; or

(ii) result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production, as compared to the condition initially determined to be necessary by the Secretary.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment submitted

June 22, 2005