To provide appeal rights and employee engagement mechanisms for passenger and property screeners.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO)Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 316 proposed by Senator McCaskill to Amendment SA 275.
March 7, 2007
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 316 proposed by Senator McCaskill to Amendment SA 275.
March 7, 2007
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 316 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 48. Record Vote Number: 64.
March 7, 2007
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 316 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 48. Record Vote Number: 64.
March 7, 2007
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2744, S2744-2745, S2746-2749, S2757-2759)
March 7, 2007
Amendment SA 316 modified to be a first degree amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text as modified: CR S2744-2745)
March 7, 2007
Amendment SA 316 proposed by Senator McCaskill to Amendment SA 275.
March 7, 2007
Amendment SA 316 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 48. Record Vote Number: 64.
March 7, 2007
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2653)
March 6, 2007
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2573, S2585-2586)
March 5, 2007
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2544)
March 2, 2007
Senate amendment submitted
March 1, 2007
Amendment SA 316 proposed by Senator McCaskill to Amendment SA 315. (consideration: CR S2465; text: CR S2465) To provide appeal rights and employee engagement mechanisms for passenger and property screeners.
March 1, 2007
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Modified
Plain text for this version is not available yet.