S.Amdt. 900
What it does: Adds SEC. ___. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS wherever appropriateWhat it changes
1 change to S. 378
Adds SEC. ___. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS wherever appropriate
Adds a sectionInserted: SEC. ___. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS.
Inserted: (a) Definitions.--In this section:
Inserted: (1) Presiding judge.--The term "presiding judge" means the judge presiding over the court proceeding concerned. In proceedings in which more than 1 judge participates, the presiding judge shall be the senior active judge so participating or, in the case of a circuit court of appeals, the senior active circuit judge so participating, except that--
Inserted: (A) in en banc sittings of any United States circuit court of appeals, the presiding judge shall be the chief judge of the circuit whenever the chief judge participates; and
Inserted: (B) in en banc sittings of the Supreme Court of the United States, the presiding judge shall be the Chief Justice whenever the Chief Justice participates.
Inserted: (2) Appellate court of the united states.--The term "appellate court of the United States" means any United States circuit court of appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Inserted: (b) Authority of Presiding Judge To Allow Media Coverage of Court Proceedings.--
Inserted: (1) Authority of appellate courts.--
Inserted: (A) In general.--Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the presiding judge of an appellate court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides.
Inserted: (B) Exception.--The presiding judge shall not permit any action under subparagraph (A), if--
Inserted: (i) in the case of a proceeding involving only the presiding judge, that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party; or
Inserted: (ii) in the case of a proceeding involving the participation of more than 1 judge, a majority of the judges participating determine that the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.
Show 10 more inserted paragraphsShow less
Inserted: (2) Authority of district courts.--
Inserted: (A) In general.--
Inserted: (i) Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided under clause (iii), the presiding judge of a district court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides.
Inserted: (ii) Obscuring of witnesses.--Except as provided under clause (iii)--
Inserted: (I) upon the request of any witness (other than a party) in a trial proceeding, the court shall order the face and voice of the witness to be disguised or otherwise obscured in such manner as to render the witness unrecognizable to the broadcast audience of the trial proceeding; and
Inserted: (II) the presiding judge in a trial proceeding shall inform each witness who is not a party that the witness has the right to request the image and voice of that witness to be obscured during the witness' testimony.
Inserted: (iii) Exception.--The presiding judge shall not permit any action under this subparagraph, if that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.
Inserted: (B) No televising of jurors.--The presiding judge shall not permit the televising of any juror in a trial proceeding.
Inserted: (3) Advisory guidelines.--The Judicial Conference of the United States may promulgate advisory guidelines to which a presiding judge, at the discretion of that judge, may refer in making decisions with respect to the management and administration of photographing, recording, broadcasting, or televising described under paragraphs (1) and (2).
Inserted: (4) Sunset of district court authority.--The authority under paragraph (2) shall terminate 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
The amendment doesn't say where this goes; the clerk decides.
Original wording
At the appropriate place, insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 900. Mr. GRASSLEY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 378, to amend title 18, United States Code, to protect judges, prosecutors, witnesses, victims, and their family members, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the appropriate place, insert the following:
SEC. ___. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS.
(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Presiding judge.--The term “presiding judge” means the judge presiding over the court proceeding concerned. In proceedings in which more than 1 judge participates, the presiding judge shall be the senior active judge so participating or, in the case of a circuit court of appeals, the senior active circuit judge so participating, except that--
(A) in en banc sittings of any United States circuit court of appeals, the presiding judge shall be the chief judge of the circuit whenever the chief judge participates; and
(B) in en banc sittings of the Supreme Court of the United States, the presiding judge shall be the Chief Justice whenever the Chief Justice participates.
(2) Appellate court of the united states.--The term “appellate court of the United States” means any United States circuit court of appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States.
(b) Authority of Presiding Judge To Allow Media Coverage of Court Proceedings.--
(1) Authority of appellate courts.--
(A) In general.--Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the presiding judge of an appellate court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides.
(B) Exception.--The presiding judge shall not permit any action under subparagraph (A), if--
(i) in the case of a proceeding involving only the presiding judge, that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party; or
(ii) in the case of a proceeding involving the participation of more than 1 judge, a majority of the judges participating determine that the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.
(2) Authority of district courts.--
(A) In general.--
(i) Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided under clause (iii), the presiding judge of a district court of the United States may, at the discretion of that judge, permit the photographing, electronic recording, broadcasting, or televising to the public of any court proceeding over which that judge presides.
(ii) Obscuring of witnesses.--Except as provided under clause (iii)--
(I) upon the request of any witness (other than a party) in a trial proceeding, the court shall order the face and voice of the witness to be disguised or otherwise obscured in such manner as to render the witness unrecognizable to the broadcast audience of the trial proceeding; and
(II) the presiding judge in a trial proceeding shall inform each witness who is not a party that the witness has the right to request the image and voice of that witness to be obscured during the witness' testimony.
(iii) Exception.--The presiding judge shall not permit any action under this subparagraph, if that judge determines the action would constitute a violation of the due process rights of any party.
(B) No televising of jurors.--The presiding judge shall not permit the televising of any juror in a trial proceeding.
(3) Advisory guidelines.--The Judicial Conference of the United States may promulgate advisory guidelines to which a presiding judge, at the discretion of that judge, may refer in making decisions with respect to the management and administration of photographing, recording, broadcasting, or televising described under paragraphs (1) and (2).
(4) Sunset of district court authority.--The authority under paragraph (2) shall terminate 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
April 19, 2007