To express the sense of the Senate that the United States should fully enforce existing sanctions, and should explore additional sanctions, with respect to North Korea and to require a review to determine whether North Korea should be re-listed as a state sponsor of terrorism.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
July 22, 2009
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
July 22, 2009
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 1761 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 66 - 31. Record Vote Number: 238.
July 22, 2009
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 1761 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 66 - 31. Record Vote Number: 238.
July 22, 2009
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1761 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Kerry.(consideration: CR S7841-7846; text: CR S7841-7842)
July 22, 2009
Amendment SA 1761 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Kerry. (consideration: CR S7841-7846; text: CR S7841-7842) To express the sense of the Senate that the United States should fully enforce existing sanctions, and should explore additional sanctions, with respect to North Korea and to require a review to determine whether North Korea should be re-listed as a state sponsor of terrorism.
July 22, 2009
Amendment SA 1761 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 66 - 31. Record Vote Number: 238.
July 22, 2009
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 1761. Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Webb) proposed an amendment to the bill S. 1390, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; as follows: At the end of subtitle C of title XII, add the following: SEC. 1232. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON ENFORCEMENT AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO NORTH KOREA; REVIEW TO DETERMINE WHETHER NORTH KOREA SHOULD BE RE-LISTED AS A STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM. (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings: (1) On April 5, 2009, the Government of North Korea tested an intermediate range ballistic missile in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1695 (2006) and 1718 (2006). (2) On April 5, 2009, President Barack Obama issued a statement on North Korea, stating that ``Preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery is a high priority for my administration'', and adding, ``North Korea has ignored its international obligations, rejected unequivocal calls for restraint, and further isolated itself from the community of nations''. (3) On April 15, 2009, the Government of North Korea announced it was expelling international inspectors from its Yongbyon nuclear facility and ending its participation in the Six Party Talks for the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. (4) On May 25, 2009, the Government of North Korea conducted a second nuclear test, in disregard of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718, which was issued in 2006 following the first such test and which demanded that North Korea not conduct any further nuclear tests or launches of a ballistic missile. (5) The State Department's 2008 Human Rights Report on North Korea, issued on February 25, 2009, found that human rights conditions inside North Korea remained poor, prison conditions are harsh and life-threatening, and citizens were denied basic freedoms such as freedom of speech, press, assembly, religion, and association. (6) Pursuant to section 102(b)(2)(E) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2799aa-1(b)(2)(E)), President George W. Bush, on February 7, 2007, notified Congress that the United States Government would oppose the extension of any loan or financial or technical assistance to North Korea by any international financial institution and the prohibition on support for the extension of such loans or assistance remains in effect. (7) On June 12, 2009, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1874, condemning North Korea's nuclear test, imposing a sweeping embargo on all arms trade with North Korea, and requiring member states not to provide financial support or other financial services that could contribute to North Korea's nuclear-related or missile- related activities or other activities related to weapons of mass destruction. (8) On July 15, 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council, pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1874, imposed a travel ban on five North Korean individuals and asset freezes on five more North Korean entities for their involvement in nuclear weapons and ballistic missile development programs, marking the first time the United Nations has imposed a travel ban on North Koreans. (9) On June 10, 2008, the Government of North Korea issued a statement, subsequently conveyed directly to the United States Government, affirming that North Korea, ``will firmly maintain its consistent stand of opposing all forms of terrorism and any support to it and will fulfill its responsibility and duty in the struggle against terrorism.''. (10) The June 10, 2008, statement by the Government of North Korea also pledged that North Korea would take ``active part in the international efforts to prevent substance, equipment and technology to be used for the production of nukes and biochemical and radioactive weapons from finding their ways to the terrorists and the organizations that support them''. (11) On June 26, 2008, President George W. Bush certified that-- (A) the Government of North Korea had not provided any support for international terrorism during the preceding 6- month period; and (B) the Government of North Korea had provided assurances that it will not support acts of international terrorism in the future. (12) The President's June 26 certification concluded, based on all available information, that there was ``no credible evidence at this time of ongoing support by the DPRK for international terrorism'' and that ``there is no credible or sustained reporting at this time that supports allegations (including as cited in recent reports by the Congressional Research Service) that the DPRK has provided direct or witting support for Hezbollah, Tamil Tigers, or the Iranian Revolutionary Guard''. (13) The State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2008, in a section on North Korea, state, ``The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) was not known to have sponsored any terrorist acts since the bombing of a Korean Airlines flight in 1987.''. (14) The Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 also state, ``A state that directs WMD resources to terrorists, or one from which enabling resources are clandestinely diverted, poses a grave WMD terrorism threat. Although terrorist organizations will continue to seek a WMD capability independent of state programs, the sophisticated WMD knowledge and resources of a state could enable a terrorist capability. State sponsors of terrorism and all nations that fail to live up to their international counterterrorism and nonproliferation obligations deserve greater scrutiny as potential facilitators of WMD terrorism.''. (15) On October 11, 2008, the Secretary of State, pursuant to the President's certification, removed North Korea from its list of state sponsors of terrorism, on which North Korea had been placed in 1988. (b) Report on Conduct of North Korea.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a detailed report examining the conduct of the Government of North Korea since June 26, 2008, based on all available information, to determine whether North Korea meets the statutory criteria for listing as a state sponsor of terrorism. The report shall-- (1) present any credible evidence of support by the Government of North Korea for acts of terrorism, terrorists, or terrorist organizations; (2) examine what steps the Government of North Korea has taken to fulfill its June 10, 2008, pledge to prevent weapons of mass destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists; and (3) assess the effectiveness of re-listing North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism as a tool to accomplish the objectives of the United States with respect to North Korea, including completely eliminating North Korea's nuclear weapons programs, preventing North Korean proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and encouraging North Korea to abide by international norms with respect to human rights. (c) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that-- (1) the United States should-- (A) vigorously enforce United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1718 (2006) and 1874 (2009) and other sanctions in place with respect to North Korea under United States law; (B) urge all member states of the United Nations to fully implement the sanctions imposed by United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1718 and 1874; and (C) explore the imposition of additional unilateral and multilateral sanctions against North Korea in furtherance of United States national security; (2) the conduct of North Korea constitutes a threat to the northeast Asian region and to international peace and security; (3) if the United States determines that the Government of North Korea has provided assistance to terrorists or engaged in state sponsored acts of terrorism, the Secretary of State should immediately list North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism; and (4) if the United States determines that the Government of North Korea has failed to fulfill its June 10, 2008, pledges, the Secretary of State should immediately list North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism. (d) State Sponsor of Terrorism Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term ``state sponsor of terrorism'' means a country that has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism for purposes of-- [[Page S7932]] (1) section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)) (as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)); (2) section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780); or (3) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371). ______