S.Amdt. 3224Senate111th Congress (2009-2011)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 3224
Sponsored by
Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID)
Submitted December 15, 2009
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
December 15, 2009
Text
Submitted
SA 3224. Mr. CRAPO submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2786 proposed by Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Dodd, and Mr. Harkin) to the bill H.R. 3590, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 510, between lines 9 and 10, insert the following: SEC. 2504. SUBMISSION OF DATA FOR PHYSICIAN ADMINISTERED DRUGS. (a) Extension for Implementation of Requirement for Hospitals to Submit Utilization Data.--Section 1927(a)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(a)(7)) is amended-- (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``in non-hospital settings and on or after August 1, 2010, in hospitals'' after ``January 1, 2006,''; (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by inserting ``in non-hospital settings and on or after August 1, 2010, in hospitals'' after ``January 1, 2008,''; and (3) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``(August 1, 2010, in the case of hospital information),'' after ``January 1, 2007,''. (b) Proportional Rebates for Dual Eligible Claims.--Section 1927(a)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r- 8)(a)(7)) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ``(E) Temporary adjustment to rebate calculation for dual eligible claims.--Only with respect to claims for rebates submitted by States to manufacturers during the 2-year period that begins on the date of enactment of this subparagraph, for purposes of calculating the amount of rebate under subsection (c) for a rebate period for a covered outpatient drug for which payment is made under a State plan or waiver under this title and under part B of title XVIII, the total number of units reported by the State of each dosage form and strength of each such drug paid for under the State plan or waiver under this title during such rebate period is deemed to be equal to the product of-- ``(i) such total number of units of such drug for which payment is made under the State plan or waiver under this title and under part B of title XVIII; and ``(ii) the proportion (expressed as a percentage) that the amount the State paid for each dosage form and strength of such drug under the State plan or waiver under this title during such rebate period bears to the amount that the State would have paid for each dosage form and strength of such drug under the State plan or waiver under this title during such rebate period if the State were the sole payer for such dosage form and strength of such drug.''. ______