To protect workers from significant job loss by providing a point of order against climate change or similar legislation that raises Federal revenues to such an extent that it causes significant job loss in manufacturing- or coal-dependent U.S. regions such as the Midwest, Great Plains or South.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 926 proposed by Senator Bond.(consideration: CR S4268; text: CR S4268)
April 2, 2009
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 926 proposed by Senator Bond.(consideration: CR S4268; text: CR S4268)
April 2, 2009
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 926 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 44. Record Vote Number: 142.
April 2, 2009
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 926 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 44. Record Vote Number: 142.
April 2, 2009
Amendment SA 926 proposed by Senator Bond. (consideration: CR S4268; text: CR S4268) To protect workers from significant job loss by providing a point of order against climate change or similar legislation that raises Federal revenues to such an extent that it causes significant job loss in manufacturing- or coal-dependent U.S. regions such as the Midwest, Great Plains or South.
April 2, 2009
Amendment SA 926 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 44. Record Vote Number: 142.
April 2, 2009
Senate amendment submitted
April 1, 2009
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 926. Mr. BOND submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 13, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 through 2014; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 68, after line 4, insert the following: SEC._. POINT OF ORDER AGAINST LEGISLATION THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT JOB LOSS. (a) In General.--After a concurrent resolution on the budget is agreed to, it shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, resolution, amendment between Houses, motion, or conference report that-- (1) would cause revenues to be more than the level of revenues set forth for that first fiscal year or for the total of that fiscal year and the ensuing fiscal years in the applicable resolution for which allocations are provided under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, and (2) would cause significant job loss in manufacturing-or coal-dependent regions of the United States such as the Midwest, Great Plains or South. (b) Supermajority Waiver and Appeal.-- (1) Waiver.--This section may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. [[Page S4226]] (2) Appeal.--An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this section. ______