To clarify that no eligible entity that receives an outreach and enrollment grant is required to provide matching funds.
What it does: Rewrites page 80, line 22 through page 81, line 7
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT)Rewrites page 80, line 22 through page 81, line 7
ReplacesPrinted pageRemoves page 80, line 22 through page 81, line 7 of the printed bill. See that page
Inserted: (e) Maintenance of Effort for States Awarded Grants; No Match Required for Any Eligible Entity Awarded a Grant.--
Inserted: (1) State maintenance of effort.--In the case of a State that is awarded a grant under this section, the State share of funds expended for outreach and enrollment activities under the State child health plan shall not be less than the State share of such funds expended in the fiscal year preceding the first fiscal year for which the grant is awarded.
Inserted: (2) No matching requirement.--No eligible entity awarded a grant under subsection (a) shall be required to provide any matching funds as a condition for receiving the grant.
Original wording
Beginning on page 80, strike line 22 and all that follows through page 81, line 7, and insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 96. Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. Grassley) proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 2, to amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to extend and improve the Children's Health Insurance Program, and for other purposes; as follows:
Beginning on page 80, strike line 22 and all that follows through page 81, line 7, and insert the following:
“(e) Maintenance of Effort for States Awarded Grants; No Match Required for Any Eligible Entity Awarded a Grant.--
“(1) State maintenance of effort.--In the case of a State that is awarded a grant under this section, the State share of funds expended for outreach and enrollment activities under the State child health plan shall not be less than the State share of such funds expended in the fiscal year preceding the first fiscal year for which the grant is awarded.
“(2) No matching requirement.--No eligible entity awarded a grant under subsection (a) shall be required to provide any matching funds as a condition for receiving the grant.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
January 29, 2009
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
January 29, 2009
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 96 proposed by Senator Baucus.(consideration: CR S1042-1043; text: CR S1042)
January 29, 2009
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 96 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
January 29, 2009
Amendment SA 96 proposed by Senator Baucus. (consideration: CR S1042-1043; text: CR S1042) To clarify that no eligible entity that receives an outreach and enrollment grant is required to provide matching funds.
January 29, 2009
Amendment SA 96 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
January 29, 2009