To prohibit unauthorized earmarks.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 1500, under the order of 2/2/2012, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 26 - 73. Record Vote Number: 9.
February 2, 2012
View full timeline
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 1500, under the order of 2/2/2012, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 26 - 73. Record Vote Number: 9.
February 2, 2012
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 1500, under the order of 2/2/2012, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 26 - 73. Record Vote Number: 9.
February 2, 2012
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S291, S292-295, S304)
February 2, 2012
Amendment SA 1500, under the order of 2/2/2012, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 26 - 73. Record Vote Number: 9.
February 2, 2012
Senate amendment submitted
February 1, 2012
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1500 proposed by Senator Inhofe to Amendment SA 1470.(consideration: CR S243-245; text: CR S243-244)
February 1, 2012
Amendment SA 1500 proposed by Senator Inhofe to Amendment SA 1470. (consideration: CR S243-245; text: CR S243-244) To prohibit unauthorized earmarks.
February 1, 2012
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 1500. Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mrs. Hutchison) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1470 proposed by Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. Collins, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Franken) to the bill S. 2038, to prohibit Members of Congress and employees of Congress from using nonpublic information derived from their official positions for personal benefit, and for other purposes; as follows: At the end of the amendment, insert the following: SEC. __. PROHIBITION ON UNAUTHORIZED EARMARKS. (a) In General.--It shall not be in order to consider a bill, joint resolution, conference report, or amendment that provides an earmark. (b) Supermajority.-- (1) Waiver.--The provisions of subsection (a) may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. (2) Appeal.--Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of the Chair relating to any [[Page S271]] provision of this section shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the measure. An affirmative vote of three- fourths of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this section. (c) Earmark Defined.--In this resolution, the term ``earmark'' means a provision or report language included primarily at the request of a Senator or Member of the House of Representatives providing or recommending a specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan, loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality, or congressional district unless the provision or language-- (1) is specifically authorized by an appropriate congressional authorizing committee of jurisdiction; (2) meets funding eligibility criteria established by an appropriate congressional authorizing committee of jurisdiction by statute; or (3) is awarded through a statutory or administrative formula-driven or competitive award process. ______