To strike the provision relating to the calculation of the 60-day period for application of patent term extension.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 600 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 126.
September 8, 2011
View full timeline
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 600 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 126.
September 8, 2011
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 600 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 126.
September 8, 2011
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 600 proposed by Senator Sessions.
September 8, 2011
Amendment SA 600 proposed by Senator Sessions. (consideration: CR S5402-5407, S5425-5436; text: CR S5402) To strike the provision relating to the calculation of the 60-day period for application of patent term extension.
September 8, 2011
Amendment SA 600 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 126.
September 8, 2011
Senate amendment submitted
September 7, 2011
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 600. Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Coburn, and Mr. Lee) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1249, to amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 149, line 20, strike all through page 150, line 16. ____________________