S.Amdt. 892Senate112th Congress (2011-2013)

To provide additional flexibility for the closing or relocation of Rural Development offices.

What it does: Inserts “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”
Submitted October 19, 2011

What it changes

1 change to H.R. 2112

Inserts text
  1. Inserts “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”

    InsertsPage 70, line 7Printed page

    …delivery[inserted: or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings]…

    Original wording

    On page 70, line 7, insert “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”.

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

On page 70, line 7, insert “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

4 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 892 proposed by Senator Durbin for Senator McCain.

October 21, 2011

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 892 proposed by Senator Durbin for Senator McCain.

October 21, 2011

Floor

Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 892 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

October 21, 2011

Floor

Amendment SA 892 proposed by Senator Durbin for Senator McCain. (consideration: CR 10/20/2011 S6848-6849; text: CR 10/20/2011 S6849) To provide additional flexibility for the closing or relocation of Rural Development offices.

October 21, 2011

Floor

Amendment SA 892 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

October 21, 2011

Floor

Senate amendment submitted

October 19, 2011