To provide additional flexibility for the closing or relocation of Rural Development offices.
What it does: Inserts “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”Inserts “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”
…delivery[inserted: or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings]…
Original wording
On page 70, line 7, insert “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”.
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
On page 70, line 7, insert “or that the closing or relocation would result in cost savings” after “delivery”.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 892 proposed by Senator Durbin for Senator McCain.
October 21, 2011
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 892 proposed by Senator Durbin for Senator McCain.
October 21, 2011
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 892 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
October 21, 2011
Amendment SA 892 proposed by Senator Durbin for Senator McCain. (consideration: CR 10/20/2011 S6848-6849; text: CR 10/20/2011 S6849) To provide additional flexibility for the closing or relocation of Rural Development offices.
October 21, 2011
Amendment SA 892 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
October 21, 2011
Senate amendment submitted
October 19, 2011