To express the sense of the Senate to enact Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 292 proposed by Senator Rubio.(consideration: CR S2281-2282; text: CR S2281)
March 22, 2013
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 292 proposed by Senator Rubio.(consideration: CR S2281-2282; text: CR S2281)
March 22, 2013
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to amendment SA 292 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 51. Record Vote Number: 64.
March 22, 2013
Amendment SA 292 proposed by Senator Rubio. (consideration: CR S2281-2282; text: CR S2281) To express the sense of the Senate to enact Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act.
March 22, 2013
Point of order raised in Senate with respect to amendment SA 292.
March 22, 2013
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to amendment SA 292 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 51. Record Vote Number: 64.
March 22, 2013
Amendment SA 292 ruled out of order by the chair.
March 22, 2013
Senate amendment submitted
March 21, 2013
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 292. Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Wicker, Mr. McConnell, and Mr. Blunt) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 8, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2014, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2013, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2015 through 2023; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title V, add the following: SEC. 5__. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING CHILD INTERSTATE ABORTIONS. (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that-- (1) laws requiring parental notification or consent prior to an abortion, or in the alternative judicial waiver, are in effect in more than half of the States, but these laws are often circumvented by interstate activity in which minors travel or are transported across State lines to avoid laws requiring parental involvement; (2) abortion providers use targeted advertising to minors across State lines, using avoidance of parental notification requirements as a selling point; (3) when an abortion provider performs an abortion on a minor without parental notification, the provider is likely to lack the complete medical history of the minor, and parents of the minor are unaware of the need to watch for complications that may develop after the abortion when the minor is sent back to her State of residence, far from the provider; and (4) parental notification and parental consent laws are supported by overwhelming majorities of the public in the United States. (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that-- (1) a physician who performs or induces an abortion on a minor who is a resident of a State other than the State in which the abortion is performed should be required by [[Page S2189]] Federal law to provide, or cause an agent of the physician to provide, at least 24 hours advance notice to a parent of the minor before the abortion is performed; (2) such a Federal requirement for interstate parental notification should not apply if -- (A) the minor declares in a signed written statement that she is the victim of sexual abuse, neglect, or physical abuse by a parent, and, before an abortion is performed on the minor, the physician notifies the authorities specified to receive reports of child abuse or neglect by the law of the State in which the minor resides of the known or suspected abuse or neglect; (B) the abortion is necessary to save the life of a minor whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, provided that the attending physician or an agent of the physician notifies a parent of the minor in writing that an abortion was performed on the minor and of the circumstances of the abortion within 24 hours; (C) the abortion is performed or induced in a State that has in force a law requiring parental involvement in the abortion decision of a minor and the physician complies with the requirements of that law; (D) the physician is presented with documentation that shows with a reasonable degree of certainty that a court in the State of residence of the minor has authorized that the minor be allowed to procure an abortion; or (E) the minor is physically accompanied by a person who presents the physician or an agent of the physician with documentation showing with a reasonable degree of certainty that he or she is in fact a parent of that minor; (3) a parent who suffers harm by a violation of the interstate notification requirement should be entitled to obtain appropriate relief in a civil action, unless that parent has committed an act of incest with the minor; (4) whoever has committed an act of incest with a minor and knowingly transports the minor across a State line with the intent that the minor obtain an abortion should be subject to imprisonment of up to 1 year for such transportation, in addition to any other penalties; and (5) Congress should enact S. 369, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (CIANA), to accomplish these purposes. ______