To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund for legislation that requires financial regulators to conduct rigorous cost-benefit analyses on all proposed rules.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 340 proposed by Senator Murray for Senator Shelby.(consideration: CR S2301-2303; text: CR S2302)
March 23, 2013
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 340 proposed by Senator Murray for Senator Shelby.(consideration: CR S2301-2303; text: CR S2302)
March 23, 2013
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 340 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 79.
March 23, 2013
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 340 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 79.
March 23, 2013
Amendment SA 340 proposed by Senator Murray for Senator Shelby. (consideration: CR S2301-2303; text: CR S2302) To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund for legislation that requires financial regulators to conduct rigorous cost-benefit analyses on all proposed rules.
March 23, 2013
Amendment SA 340 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 79.
March 23, 2013
Senate amendment submitted
March 21, 2013
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 340. Mr. SHELBY (for himself and Mr. Inhofe) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 8, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2014, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2013, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2015 through 2023; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title III, add the following: SEC. 3__. DEFICIT-NEUTRAL RESERVE FUND TO REQUIRE FINANCIAL REGULATORS TO CONDUCT RIGOROUS COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES ON ALL PROPOSED RULES. The Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Budget may revise the allocations of a committee or committees, aggregates, and other appropriate levels in this resolution for one or more bills, joint resolutions, amendments, amendments between the Houses, motions, or conference reports that relate to the finalization of rules with positive cost- benefit analyses promulgated by a financial regulator, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Financial Research, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, by the amounts provided in such legislation for that purpose, provided that such legislation would not increase the deficit over either the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2018 or the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2023. ______