H.Amdt. 878House114th Congress (2015-2017)

Amendment adds a new subsection requiring the commission to consider rules that are limiting or prohibiting government agencies from adopting technology to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

What it does: 3 changes: inserts text, replaces text in 2 places
Submitted January 6, 2016

Description

An amendment No. 2 printed in Part B of House Report 114-388 to add a new subsection requiring the commission to consider rules that are limiting or prohibiting government agencies from adopting technology to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

What it changes

3 changes to H.R. 1155 · 1 shown in the bill's text

Inserts textReplaces text in 2 places
  1. Change 1: Inserts new text on page 13, line 12

    Inserted: (I) Whether or not the rule or set of rules limits or prevents an agency from applying new or emerging technologies to improve efficiency and effectiveness of government.

    Original wording

    Page 13, insert after line 12 the following:

  2. Change 2: Replaces “(I)” with “(J)”

    ReplacesPage 13, line 13Printed page

    [struck: (I)][inserted: (J)]

    Original wording

    Page 13, line 13, strike “(I)” and insert “(J)”.

  3. Change 3: Replaces “(G), or (H)” with “(G), (H), or (I)”

    ReplacesPage 17, line 24Printed page

    In H.R. 1155 · Introduced in House

    (D) identify the criteria under subsection (h)(2) that caused the classification of the rule or set of rules and the basis upon which the Commission determined that those criteria were met;

    (E) for each rule or set of rules listed under the criteria set forth in subparagraphs (B), (D), (F), (G), [inserted: (H), ]or ([struck: H][inserted: I]) of subsection (h)(2), or other criteria established by the Commission under subparagraph (I) of such subsection under which the Commission evaluated alternatives to the rule or set of rules that could lead to lower regulatory costs, identify alternatives to the rule or set of rules that the Commission recommends the agency consider as replacements for the rule or set of rules and the basis on which the Commission rests the recommendations, and, in identifying such alternatives, emphasize alternatives that will achieve regulatory effectiveness at the lowest cost and with the lowest adverse impacts on jobs;

    (F) for each rule or set of rules listed under the criteria set forth in subsection (h)(2)(E), the other Federal, State, or local governmental rules that the Commission found the rule or set of rules to overlap, duplicate, or conflict with, and the basis for the findings of the Commission; and

    Original wording

    Page 17, line 24, strike “(G), or (H)” and insert “(G), (H), or (I)”.

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

Page 13, insert after line 12 the following:

(I) Whether or not the rule or set of rules limits or prevents an agency from applying new or emerging technologies to improve efficiency and effectiveness of government.

Page 13, line 13, strike “(I)” and insert “(J)”.

Page 17, line 24, strike “(G), or (H)” and insert “(G), (H), or (I)”.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

5 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

House amendment offered

January 6, 2016

View full timeline
Floor

House amendment offered

January 6, 2016

Not Used

Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole

January 6, 2016 • 7:10 PM

Floor

House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.

January 6, 2016 • 7:10 PM

Not Used

House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Schweikert.(consideration: CR H77-78; text: CR H77)

January 6, 2016 • 7:05 PM

Floor

Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Schweikert. (consideration: CR H77-78; text: CR H77)

January 6, 2016 • 7:05 PM

Floor

On agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.

January 6, 2016 • 7:10 PM