S.Amdt. 176Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 176
Sponsored by
Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT)
Submitted January 26, 2015
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
January 26, 2015
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
January 26, 2015
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
January 26, 2015
Text
Submitted
SA 176. Mr. DAINES submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2 proposed by Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Risch, Mr. Lee, Mr. Flake, Mr. Daines, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Portman, Mr. Alexander, and Mrs. Capito) to the bill S. 1, to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: In section 2 of the amendment, strike subsection (b) and insert the following: (b) Environmental Impact Statement.--The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement issued by the Secretary of State in January 2014, regarding the pipeline referred to in subsection (a), and the environmental analysis, consultation, and review described in that document (including appendices)-- (1) shall be considered to fully satisfy-- (A) all requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and (B) any other provision of law that requires Federal agency consultation or review (including the consultation or review required under section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536(a))) with respect to the pipeline and facilities referred to in subsection (a); and (2) shall be modified to include a provision requiring that the designation of National Monuments in any States in which the pipeline or cross-border facilities described in subsection (a) is to be located shall be subject to-- (A) consultation with each unit of local government within the boundaries of which the proposed National Monument is to be located; and (B) the approval by the Governor and legislature of each State within the boundaries of which the proposed National Monument is to be located. ______