S.Amdt. 1948Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 1948
Sponsored by
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
Submitted June 9, 2015
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 9, 2015
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
June 9, 2015
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
June 9, 2015
Text
Submitted
SA 1948. Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. Franken, and Mr. Markey) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1463 proposed by Mr. McCain to the bill H.R. 1735, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2016 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle G of title X, add the following: SEC. 1085. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE. (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings: (1) The 2015 National Security Strategy states that climate change is ``an urgent and growing threat to our national security''. (2) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review describes long-term strategies and initiatives for the Department of Defense and states that-- (A) ``the pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance institutions around the world''; and (B) the effects of climate change are ``threat multipliers'' that aggravate stressors abroad that can ``enable terrorist activity and other violence''. (3) The 2014 Department of Defense Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap asserts that climate change will ``be felt across the full range of Department activities, including plans, operations, training, infrastructure, and acquisition'' and that among the potential effects of climate change are-- (A) ``instability within and among other nations''; (B) ``decreased training/testing land-carrying capacity to support current testing and training rotation types or levels''; (C) ``increased inundation, erosion, and flooding damage'' to Department of Defense infrastructure; and (D) ``reduced availability of or access to the materials, resources, and industrial infrastructure needed to manufacture the Department's weapon systems and supplies''. (4) The 2014 United States Government Accountability Office report entitled ``Climate Change Adaptation: DOD Can Improve Infrastructure Planning and Processes to Better Account for Potential Impacts'' assessed 15 sites at defense installations in the United States for vulnerability to the effects of climate change. The report found that climate change could affect Department of Defense readiness and fiscal exposure in the following ways: (A) ``According to DOD officials, the combination of thawing permafrost, decreasing sea ice, and rising sea levels on the Alaskan coast has increased coastal erosion at several Air Force radar early warning and communication installations''. (B) ``Impacts on DOD's infrastructure from this erosion have included damaged roads, seawalls, and runways''. (C) ``Officials on a Navy installation told GAO that sea level rise and resulting storm surge are the two largest threats to their waterfront infrastructure''. (D) ``Officials provided examples of impacts from reduced precipitation--such as drought and wildfire risk--and identified potential mission vulnerabilities--such as reduced live-fire training''. (5) The 2014 CNA Corporation released a report entitled ``National Security Risks and the Accelerating Risks of Climate Change''. The report by the Corporation, the Military Advisory Board of which was comprised of 15 generals and admirals retired from the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps, found that-- (A) ``climate change impacts are already accelerating instability in vulnerable areas of the world and are serving as catalysts for conflict''; and (B) ``actions by the United States and the international community have been insufficient to adapt to the challenges associated with projected climate change''. (6) The Military Advisory Board also wrote that ``[w]e are dismayed that discussions of climate change have become so polarizing and have receded from the arena of informed public discourse and debate. Political posturing and budgetary woes cannot be allowed to inhibit discussion and debate over what so many believe to be a salient national security concern for our Nation''. (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that it is in the national security interests of the United States to assess, plan for, and mitigate the security and strategic implications of climate change. ______