S.Amdt. 2757Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)
S.Amdt. 2757
Sponsored by
Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH)
Submitted October 29, 2015
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
October 29, 2015
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
October 29, 2015
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
October 29, 2015
Text
Submitted
SA 2757. Mr. PORTMAN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1314, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a right to an administrative appeal relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt status of certain organizations; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title V, insert the following: SEC. 505. BENEFIT SUSPENSIONS FOR MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS IN CRITICAL AND DECLINING STATUS. (a) ERISA Amendments.--Section 305(e)(9)(H) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1085(e)(9)(H)) is amended-- (1) in clause (ii)-- (A) by striking ``Except as provided in clause (v), the'' and inserting ``The''; and (B) by striking ``a majority of all participants and beneficiaries of the plan'' and inserting ``, of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan who cast a vote, a majority''; (2) by striking clause (v); (3) by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (v); and (4) in clause (v), as so redesignated-- (A) by striking ``(or following a determination under clause (v) that the plan is a systemically important plan)''; and (B) by striking ``(or, in the case of a suspension that goes into effect under clause (v), at a time sufficient to allow the implementation of the suspension prior to the end of the 90-day period described in clause (v)(I))''. (b) IRC Amendments.--Section 432(e)(9)(H) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended-- (1) in clause (ii)-- (A) by striking ``Except as provided in clause (v), the'' and inserting ``The''; and (B) by striking ``a majority of all participants and beneficiaries of the plan'' and inserting ``, of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan who cast a vote, a majority''; (2) by striking clause (v); (3) by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (v); and (4) in clause (v), as so redesignated-- (A) by striking ``(or following a determination under clause (v) that the plan is a systemically important plan)''; and (B) by striking ``(or, in the case of a suspension that goes into effect under clause (v), at a time sufficient to allow the implementation of the suspension prior to the end of the 90-day period described in clause (v)(I))''. (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to any vote on the suspension of benefits under section 305(e)(9)(H) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1085(e)(9)(H)) and section 432(e)(9)(H) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that occurs after the date of enactment of this Act. ______